› ›

Who should/could be a Bond actor?

1…105106108110111…1235

Comments

  • mcdonbbmcdonbb deep in the Heart of Texas
    Posts: 4,116
    Huddleston good actor but does not present well as a modern vision of Bond to me.

    Especially if he had to follow Craig. That's just my opinion.
  • dominicgreenedominicgreene The Eternal QOS Defender
    edited January 2016 Posts: 1,756
    I know it will sound silly but I wonder if they could get Pierce back, even just for one. He still looks damn good.
  • DaltonCraig007DaltonCraig007 They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."
    Posts: 15,723
    Nevermind Pierce, why can't they finally give Timothy Dalton his 3rd Bond film? He looks splendid for his age and would give one heck of a performance as a James Bond back for one last mission.
  • Risico007Risico007
    Posts: 9,858
    Heck Roger still looks ....

    You know lets just stop before this gets silly
  • GermanladyGermanlady
    Posts: 6,601
    Lol, but somehow Dalton looks better now then back then.
  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 5,131
    He needs to borrow Connery's wig then.
  • BondBugBondBug
    edited January 2016 Posts: 158
    DELETED
  • BondBugBondBug
    Posts: 158

    Risico007 wrote: »
    again I feel I need to point out three factors for Craig

    1. the man still looks incredible

    2. He still wants to do it I believe

    3. We live in a world of Taken other such films with older (50-70) actors being bad asses and doing amazing things. Again watching Bond mature And "age" in the roll and then having a soft reboot after the Craig Era (like AVTAK-TLD) would be fine this of course also means Craig could conceivably be bond for another 6-10 years and of course 3-5 films.

    Yes, I agree with that. Craig could keep playing Bond for many years if he wants IMHO. I also think Moore could have played Bond into his 60s if they had made his character older. However, when Craig goes, I would like a young actor, around 30, just to change it up a little.

  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    Risico007 wrote: »
    Heck Roger still looks ....

    You know lets just stop before this gets silly

    Yes, please :))
  • Risico007Risico007
    Posts: 9,858
    doubleoego wrote: »
    Risico007 wrote: »
    Heck Roger still looks ....

    You know lets just stop before this gets silly

    Yes, please :))


    you know with CGI we could resurrect Barry nelson and.... Ok now we have hit insanity ;)
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 41,011
    To any Hugh Jackman fans who would have loved for him to play James Bond, you may enjoy this:

    http://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/jan/11/hugh-jackman-hints-at-james-bond-role-with-007-long-impression-on-twitter
  • GermanladyGermanlady
    Posts: 6,601
    LOL.
    He better gets Danny boy and they finally do the A Steady Rain film version, which has even been written. The idea was there and not a bad one. That would make a fine film.
  • LudovicoLudovico
    Posts: 15,229
    Jackman is too old to succeed to Craig and far too Wolverine.
  • AceHoleAceHole Belgium, via Britain
    Posts: 1,731
    Just NO. Jackman is a stage & muscial theatre actor at heart, and it show in his performances on film. He is not subtle enough to play Bond effectively.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 41,011
    It was a video posted in jest and good fun. Calm down, everyone, Jackman isn't playing the next Bond.
  • GermanladyGermanlady
    Posts: 6,601
    Its funny, how people would jump on such obvious bullocks.
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,359
    Some people are too literal. ;)
    giphy.gif
  • mcdonbbmcdonbb deep in the Heart of Texas
    Posts: 4,116
    I bet he would if they offered ...NOT SAYING THEY WILL OR ARE OFFERING SO DONT START ATTACKING LIKE Y'ALL NORMALLY DO.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited January 2016 Posts: 23,883
    I wouldn't mind Jackman actually. He's a little too old now but could do a few.

    My preference is Hiddleston and failing that, this Turner fellow seems interesting.
  • mcdonbbmcdonbb deep in the Heart of Texas
    edited January 2016 Posts: 4,116
    Well if your following the SF timeline then they could cast older and get away with it. Actually Jackman is popular enough at least in the States I don't think anyone would care.

    Big name, big draw. .
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,252
    The one thing that amuses me are when people question Jackman's "manliness" He is a versatile actor who has done a wide range of roles. The obvious retort to this criticism is his portrayal of Wolverine but if anyone needs any more convincing, watch Prisoners The actor portraying the person being interrogated in this must have quite a bit of intestinal fortitude.

  • GermanladyGermanlady
    Posts: 6,601
    He didnt get the gig in 2005, so it makes less then no sense to go there now. But Daniel and him are best friends, so he could do another casting job, if Jackman has appetite for Bond as whatsoever. He has become quite a good actor.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,252
    I think, if they wanted to maintain the same timeline, he could do a couple. The only reason for this would be Daniel not wanting to continue, otherwise a younger actor, in a new incarnation of the character, would be more appropriate.
  • dinovelvetdinovelvet
    Posts: 709
    mcdonbb wrote: »
    Well if your following the SF timeline then they could cast older and get away with it. Actually Jackman is popular enough at least in the States I don't think anyone would care.

    Big name, big draw. .

    His name didn't help Pan or Chappie too much. I kind of wonder if he IS sort of half-jokingly but half-not putting his name out there, just on the offchance EON are still interested...his Wolverine gig is coming to an end and after two big flops in a row, maybe he's nervous about staying relevant.

    Still, will never happen.
  • AnthraxAnthrax Sweden
    Posts: 77
    My vote would go to Chris Pratt. He would need to dye his hair black and possibly shave himself first though, and I think that he will not get the role.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 41,011
    Anthrax wrote: »
    My vote would go to Chris Pratt. He would need to dye his hair black and possibly shave himself first though, and I think that he will not get the role.

    The American who has been in a few blockbusters should be the next James Bond? Really?
  • dinovelvetdinovelvet
    Posts: 709
    Anthrax wrote: »
    My vote would go to Chris Pratt. He would need to dye his hair black and possibly shave himself first though, and I think that he will not get the role.

    Good grief.
  • mcdonbbmcdonbb deep in the Heart of Texas
    Posts: 4,116
    dinovelvet wrote: »
    mcdonbb wrote: »
    Well if your following the SF timeline then they could cast older and get away with it. Actually Jackman is popular enough at least in the States I don't think anyone would care.

    Big name, big draw. .

    His name didn't help Pan or Chappie too much. I kind of wonder if he IS sort of half-jokingly but half-not putting his name out there, just on the offchance EON are still interested...his Wolverine gig is coming to an end and after two big flops in a row, maybe he's nervous about staying relevant.

    Still, will never happen.

    Craig didn't help Cowboys and Aliens either ...nor has Harrison Ford outside Indy or SW.

    Audiences sometimes though want to see certain actors in a role. I'm not saying he will get role or be offered or that it would work but I bet he would accept.aa
    dinovelvet wrote: »
    Anthrax wrote: »
    My vote would go to Chris Pratt. He would need to dye his hair black and possibly shave himself first though, and I think that he will not get the role.

    Good grief.

    Thanks for your suggestion but Pratt hits me as the perfect Indy.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    Anthrax wrote: »
    My vote would go to Chris Pratt. He would need to dye his hair black and possibly shave himself first though, and I think that he will not get the role.
    You're talking about Indy, not Bond, right? I'm assuming you were toggling between forums and mixed up posts.
  • gumboltgumbolt Now with in-office photocopier
    edited January 2016 Posts: 153
    Jackman or Pratt? edited for unacceptable language - no!
    I think Aaron Taylor Johnson is a dark horse. Turner's time as a favourite will pass. Cavill maybe because Eon do linger. But my nose says DC will continue and the next Bond may not be on the radar.
Sign In or Register to comment.