Who should/could be a Bond actor?

12502512532552561237

Comments

  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    They can do a lot of with camera tricks these days (as was quite apparent to me in SP at least), but I'd still prefer someone who clears the 6ft threshold as a minimum the next time out.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,270
    Yeah, the height could be an issue but the amount of muscle is manageable.

    Along the same lines, the other night I was watching Casino Royale and something really stood out to me that I had somewhat previously noticed. During the "Bodyworks" sequence, when Dimitrios pulls the knife on Bond, I am struck by how small Craig looks in this shot, not only in relation to Dimitrios but to most everyone in the shot.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    Yes, I noticed that. It's also quite noticeable in the tube station in SF as he's chasing Silva. They hide it well generally.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 41,013
    I'm of the camp that wouldn't want Hardy in the role, but yes, I've also seen worse suggestions (the Hemsworth brothers, Jamie Bell, etc.)
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    I'm of the camp that wouldn't want Hardy in the role, but yes, I've also seen worse suggestions (the Hemsworth brothers, Jamie Bell, etc.)
    +1
  • Posts: 3,334
    suavejmf wrote: »
    Hiddleston has a great voice for Bond, well spoken and classy without being overtly 'posh'.
    Nic try, @suave, but Hiddy sounds as posh as they come. He even makes Prince Charles sound common. But I agree with you folks on the "voice". Deep and commanding is the key, which is why I like Turner's voice as it has those same rich, earthy qualities found in the best Bonds. Brosnan's voice was too whispy for me.

  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 5,131
    bondsum wrote: »
    suavejmf wrote: »
    Hiddleston has a great voice for Bond, well spoken and classy without being overtly 'posh'.
    Nic try, @suave, but Hiddy sounds as posh as they come. He even makes Prince Charles sound common. But I agree with you folks on the "voice". Deep and commanding is the key, which is why I like Turner's voice as it has those same rich, earthy qualities found in the best Bonds. Brosnan's voice was too whispy for me.

    Hiddleston speaks like an english public school boy and Bond is a public school boy. Nope nothing like Prince Charles who speaks like an overt toff.....which is understandable.
  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    edited February 2017 Posts: 5,131
    When everyone was saying yes to Tom Hardy as the next Bond I was screaming NO! He's a fine actor and I really like him in Mad Max but he's no Bond. He looks like he goes to the gym way too often, at least too often for Bond. Also his looks, to me, are too similar to Craig. By that I mean he's more rough looking than handsome/charming.

    Hardy is 2 inches smaller than Craig. Craig is average UK height at 5'10". Hardy is below at 5'8". That's a automatic rejection without interview......CV in the bin!
  • suavejmf wrote: »
    Brosnan loves heavy breathing and sighing all the time.....its like he's deflating!

    Think it was his ritual build up to activating pain face, he does make alot of random noices.

  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 5,131
    The Bond screen test tick sheet should start off with 7x questions, if any answer is a no your out. The questions should be .....Are you Male? Are you over 30? Are you British? Are you white? Are you an actor? Are you 5'10' or over? Do you have hair? ......these are all primitive but essential starting points. Yet some suggestions on here don't even measure up to such basic requirements.
  • Posts: 3,334
    suavejmf wrote: »
    bondsum wrote: »
    suavejmf wrote: »
    Hiddleston has a great voice for Bond, well spoken and classy without being overtly 'posh'.
    Nic try, @suave, but Hiddy sounds as posh as they come. He even makes Prince Charles sound common. But I agree with you folks on the "voice". Deep and commanding is the key, which is why I like Turner's voice as it has those same rich, earthy qualities found in the best Bonds. Brosnan's voice was too whispy for me.

    Hiddleston speaks like an english public school boy and Bond is a public school boy. Nope nothing like Prince Charles who speaks like an overt toff.....which is understandable.
    Sorry, @Sauve, but you're wrong. The vast majority of my friends are ex-public schoolboys and they do not sound as plumby as Eaton-boy Hiddles, who sounds like a throwback to last century's toffs in tweeds sticking a guinea on the Point-to-Point. And for the record, I didn't say Hiddles sounded like Prince Charles, I stated he was so posh he made him sound as common as muck. There's a notable difference.
  • edited February 2017 Posts: 386
    Hiddles doesn't have the look at all.

    He looks like an amiable architect, not a gentleman killer.
  • edited February 2017 Posts: 4,412
    suavejmf wrote: »
    The Bond screen test tick sheet should start off with 7x questions, if any answer is a no your out. The questions should be .....Are you Male? Are you over 30? Are you British? Are you white? Are you an actor? Are you 5'10' or over? Do you have hair? ......these are all primitive but essential starting points. Yet some suggestions on here don't even measure up to such basic requirements.

    I’m not sure it’s quite as simple as that. In a reductive sense, those are the basic requirements. But they also allow a lot of actors not well suited to the role through and omit many who are. When casting Bond, you are not just casting someone with the ‘look’ – you also need charisma and screen presence.

    Here’s an example – Lazenby had the look. He satisfies (most) of your requirements (he’s from the Commonwealth, at the very least) but he was an uninspired choice. He was boring, bland and lacked charisma. The most painful thing is that it showed on screen.

    Now contrast that with Daniel Craig – someone who didn’t fit the traditional bill. He was blonde, short, gruff and far from traditionally handsome. However, he had a certain intensity and intimidatingly suave presence that works on screen. His laconic style comes across as effortless and cool.

    While having a reductive criteria is helping in getting the riff-raff out, it doesn’t help grabbing a more inspired choice. Do we really want another typical choice or someone radical like Craig?

    So who is an example of a choice like this?

    Well, I would say Idris Elba is (I’m not going to descend into the whole ‘black’ argument). But it’s undeniable that Elba does not fit the traditional mould. However, he’s very cool, suave and debonair. Plus he’s got sexual charisma and charm to spare. I’m not saying any charming ethic man can be Bond, but Elba has a certain quality which makes him ideal for the role. So he would work – he’s probably too old and not commercially right for the role right now but (even his most ardent critic would admit) worth considering at the very least.

    _87777146_87777145.jpg

    Another actor with a similar dilemma would be Cillian Murphy. Once again, he does not suit the bill at all. But his portrayal in Peaky Blinders has shown that he can bring a cool and sexy efficacy to the screen. There’s a haunted and demonic feel to him, that is more suited to playing the villain (people said the same thing about Craig), but he could bring something very interesting to the role.

    cillian-murphy-as-thomas-shelby.jpg

    Another choice may be Jack O’Connell. He’s a bit younger and shorter than we are used to. He’s also very working class and gruff. But he has an intensity and feral quality that is very reminiscent of Tom Hardy. He’s got a cocksure sort of confidence that is very similar to Fleming’s Bond. Basically, he’s arrogant but wears it very well. I think he would be interesting.

    Jack-OConnell-2016-Photo-Shoot-Mr-Porter-004-800x450.jpeg

    So just a few examples of people who don’t fit the mould. But are all valid and worthy of consideration. I’m just saying that the choice isn’t limited to square-jawed, posh, white men in their 30s/40s. If anything the more inspired decisions come from thinking outside the box.


  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 5,131
    bondsum wrote: »
    suavejmf wrote: »
    bondsum wrote: »
    suavejmf wrote: »
    Hiddleston has a great voice for Bond, well spoken and classy without being overtly 'posh'.
    Nic try, @suave, but Hiddy sounds as posh as they come. He even makes Prince Charles sound common. But I agree with you folks on the "voice". Deep and commanding is the key, which is why I like Turner's voice as it has those same rich, earthy qualities found in the best Bonds. Brosnan's voice was too whispy for me.

    Hiddleston speaks like an english public school boy and Bond is a public school boy. Nope nothing like Prince Charles who speaks like an overt toff.....which is understandable.
    Sorry, @Sauve, but you're wrong. The vast majority of my friends are ex-public schoolboys and they do not sound as plumby as Eaton-boy Hiddles, who sounds like a throwback to last century's toffs in tweeds sticking a guinea on the Point-to-Point. And for the record, I didn't say Hiddles sounded like Prince Charles, I stated he was so posh he made him sound as common as muck. There's a notable difference.

    A vast majority of my friends are ex-public schoolboys too and they sound much more plumby than Eaton-boy Hiddles.
  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    edited February 2017 Posts: 5,131
    suavejmf wrote: »
    The Bond screen test tick sheet should start off with 7x questions, if any answer is a no your out. The questions should be .....Are you Male? Are you over 30? Are you British? Are you white? Are you an actor? Are you 5'10' or over? Do you have hair? ......these are all primitive but essential starting points. Yet some suggestions on here don't even measure up to such basic requirements.

    I’m not sure it’s quite as simple as that. In a reductive sense, those are the basic requirements. But they also allow a lot of actors not well suited to the role through and omit many who are. When casting Bond, you are not just casting someone with the ‘look’ – you also need charisma and screen presence.

    Here’s an example – Lazenby had the look. He satisfies (most) of your requirements (he’s from the Commonwealth, at the very least) but he was an uninspired choice. He was boring, bland and lacked charisma. The most painful thing is that it showed on screen.

    Now contrast that with Daniel Craig – someone who didn’t fit the traditional bill. He was blonde, short, gruff and far from traditionally handsome. However, he had a certain intensity and intimidatingly suave presence that works on screen. His laconic style comes across as effortless and cool.

    While having a reductive criteria is helping in getting the riff-raff out, it doesn’t help grabbing a more inspired choice. Do we really want another typical choice or someone radical like Craig?

    So who is an example of a choice like this?

    Well, I would say Idris Elba is (I’m not going to descend into the whole ‘black’ argument). But it’s undeniable that Elba does not fit the traditional mould. However, he’s very cool, suave and debonair. Plus he’s got sexual charisma and charm to spare. I’m not saying any charming ethic man can be Bond, but Elba has a certain quality which makes him ideal for the role. So he would work – he’s probably too old and not commercially right for the role right now but (even his most ardent critic would admit) worth considering at the very least.

    _87777146_87777145.jpg

    Another actor with a similar dilemma would be Cillian Murphy. Once again, he does not suit the bill at all. But his portrayal in Peaky Blinders has shown that he can bring a cool and sexy efficacy to the screen. There’s a haunted and demonic feel to him, that is more suited to playing the villain (people said the same thing about Craig), but he could bring something very interesting to the role.

    cillian-murphy-as-thomas-shelby.jpg

    Another choice may be Jack O’Connell. He’s a bit younger and shorter than we are used to. He’s also very working class and gruff. But he has an intensity and feral quality that is very reminiscent of Tom Hardy. He’s got a cocksure sort of confidence that is very similar to Fleming’s Bond. Basically, he’s arrogant but wears it very well. I think he would be interesting.

    Jack-OConnell-2016-Photo-Shoot-Mr-Porter-004-800x450.jpeg

    So just a few examples of people who don’t fit the mould. But are all valid and worthy of consideration. I’m just saying that the choice isn’t limited to square-jawed, posh, white men in their 30s/40s. If anything the more inspired decisions come from thinking outside the box.


    Craig fitted the bill to all my starting points above?

    I said as a 'starting point' not the mould.

    Elba is black so an automatic no for the character of Bond. Shaft/ Blade yes. Hardy is too short....automatic no.

    Warwick Davis would be 'interesting', but unfortunately he's a midget.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited February 2017 Posts: 23,883
    suavejmf wrote: »
    Craig fitted the bill to all my starting points above?

    I said as a 'starting point' not the mould.
    The starting point seems to have been quietly retrofitted to accommodate Craig. Surely Bond in the books was over 6ft so if we're being pedantic, we should try to stick to this general criteria? Craig's been ok but I'm not too keen on his look for Bond to be honest. He makes up for it with his acting certainly, but Dalton had more of the Bond look imho.
    suavejmf wrote: »
    Hiddleston has a great voice for Bond, well spoken and classy without being overtly 'posh'.
    He gets bashed around here quite a bit, but I agree with you. He does certainly sound more posh than anyone in my school did (save for one eccentric chap with a curious fixation for buses), but I love it nonetheless. Bond could do with a little more upper class style imho.

    No to Cillian Murphy or Jack O'Connell for me. Murphy couldn't play in the same league as Bale in Bat or Leonardo & Hardy in Inception imho. O'Connell was outclassed by Clooney in Money Monster. Elba meets all the criteria apart from two obvious ones (age and colour). A black Bond is not sellable globally (yet) and as has been mentioned, the character is white (although there is absolutely no reason why he technically can't be black).
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    253 pages and counting...I think its fair to say that no matter the suggestion there'll never be a candidate that most of us can agree on as the 7th Bond actor.
  • edited February 2017 Posts: 4,412
    bondjames wrote: »
    suavejmf wrote: »
    Craig fitted the bill to all my starting points above?

    I said as a 'starting point' not the mould.
    The starting point seems to have been quietly retrofitted to accommodate Craig. Surely Bond in the books was over 6ft so if we're being pedantic, we should try to stick to this general criteria? Craig's been ok but I'm not too keen on his look for Bond to be honest. He makes up for it with his acting certainly, but Dalton had more of the Bond look imho.
    suavejmf wrote: »
    Hiddleston has a great voice for Bond, well spoken and classy without being overtly 'posh'.
    He gets bashed around here quite a bit, but I agree with you. He does certainly sound more posh than anyone in my school did (save for one eccentric chap with a curious fixation for buses), but I love it nonetheless. Bond could do with a little more upper class style imho.

    No to Cillian Murphy or Jack O'Connell for me. Murphy couldn't play in the same league as Bale in Bat or Leonardo & Hardy in Inception imho. O'Connell was outclassed by Clooney in Money Monster. Elba meets all the criteria apart from two obvious ones (age and colour). A black Bond is not sellable globally (yet) and as has been mentioned, the character is white (although there is absolutely no reason why he technically can't be black).

    Unfortunately, you’re right. I thought the climate may have been right for a black actor in the role but things have taken a turn. 2016 happened. The internet has created an outlet for people to spread hate and vitriol.

    Just look at the hate the pretty innocuous idea of having female Ghostbusters caused? That film crashed and burned at the box office, despite strong reviews. You need fan support to create buzz. Message boards and comment sections are lethal these days and can kill the word. People feel a legitimate ownership over these properties and don’t want the fundamental fabric of them tampered with. Plus Trump and Brexit have started to legitimise racism and hate.

    I think Eon will pay attention – it doesn’t make good commercial sense to have a black actor currently. Maybe back in 2006 it would have worked, but not today.

    “Outside of the box” contenders doesn’t necessarily mean black actors. Having said that there are some great choices currently. David Oyelwo was ripped for Othello and clearly got on well with Broccoli (she hosted a special screening of his film Queen of Katwe in New York and they did a Q&A together). Also Chiwetel Ejiofer is a marvellous actor and showed some real grit in the otherwise woeful Triple 9.

    13OTHELLO-master1050.jpg

    Personally, I’d rather they did something new. Craig was a huge departure from the pretty boy Pierce Brosnan types mentioned back in 2004-5. I was something interesting this time around. I’m really not interested in seeing a Tom Hiddleston, Aidan Turner, Henry Cavill, James Norton type. They’re all a little uninspired.

    Can’t we have someone intriguing like Craig? Alternatively, an objectively great actor with serious clout like Michael Fassbender or Tom Hardy.

    I don’t want a boring and agreeable choice (I’m looking at you Aidan Turner)
  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 5,131
    bondjames wrote: »
    suavejmf wrote: »
    Craig fitted the bill to all my starting points above?

    I said as a 'starting point' not the mould.
    The starting point seems to have been quietly retrofitted to accommodate Craig. Surely Bond in the books was over 6ft so if we're being pedantic, we should try to stick to this general criteria? Craig's been ok but I'm not too keen on his look for Bond to be honest. He makes up for it with his acting certainly, but Dalton had more of the Bond look imho.
    suavejmf wrote: »
    Hiddleston has a great voice for Bond, well spoken and classy without being overtly 'posh'.
    He gets bashed around here quite a bit, but I agree with you. He does certainly sound more posh than anyone in my school did (save for one eccentric chap with a curious fixation for buses), but I love it nonetheless. Bond could do with a little more upper class style imho.

    No to Cillian Murphy or Jack O'Connell for me. Murphy couldn't play in the same league as Bale in Bat or Leonardo & Hardy in Inception imho. O'Connell was outclassed by Clooney in Money Monster. Elba meets all the criteria apart from two obvious ones (age and colour). A black Bond is not sellable globally (yet) and as has been mentioned, the character is white (although there is absolutely no reason why he technically can't be black).

    Yes and No. From an economic viewpoint it is less likely that Bond would be black. He is an officer in the navy (it is quite a rare for high ranking officers to be black). Also he is a public school boy. Black people are still the lowest paid ethnic group in the UK. But that's beside the point as there is no point in changing the classic character just to be PC.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,477
    bondjames wrote: »
    suavejmf wrote: »
    Craig fitted the bill to all my starting points above?

    I said as a 'starting point' not the mould.
    The starting point seems to have been quietly retrofitted to accommodate Craig. Surely Bond in the books was over 6ft so if we're being pedantic, we should try to stick to this general criteria? Craig's been ok but I'm not too keen on his look for Bond to be honest. He makes up for it with his acting certainly, but Dalton had more of the Bond look imho.
    suavejmf wrote: »
    Hiddleston has a great voice for Bond, well spoken and classy without being overtly 'posh'.
    He gets bashed around here quite a bit, but I agree with you. He does certainly sound more posh than anyone in my school did (save for one eccentric chap with a curious fixation for buses), but I love it nonetheless. Bond could do with a little more upper class style imho.

    No to Cillian Murphy or Jack O'Connell for me. Murphy couldn't play in the same league as Bale in Bat or Leonardo & Hardy in Inception imho. O'Connell was outclassed by Clooney in Money Monster. Elba meets all the criteria apart from two obvious ones (age and colour). A black Bond is not sellable globally (yet) and as has been mentioned, the character is white (although there is absolutely no reason why he technically can't be black).

    Unfortunately, you’re right. I thought the climate may have been right for a black actor in the role but things have taken a turn. 2016 happened. The internet has created an outlet for people to spread hate and vitriol.

    Just look at the hate the pretty innocuous idea of having female Ghostbusters caused? That film crashed and burned at the box office, despite strong reviews. You need fan support to create buzz. Message boards and comment sections are lethal these days and can kill the word. People feel a legitimate ownership over these properties and don’t want the fundamental fabric of them tampered with. Plus Trump and Brexit have started to legitimise racism and hate.

    I think Eon will pay attention – it doesn’t make good commercial sense to have a black actor currently. Maybe back in 2006 it would have worked, but not today.

    “Outside of the box” contenders doesn’t necessarily mean black actors. Having said that there are some great choices currently. David Oyelwo was ripped for Othello and clearly got on well with Broccoli (she hosted a special screening of his film Queen of Katwe in New York and they did a Q&A together). Also Chiwetel Ejiofer is a marvellous actor and showed some real grit in the otherwise woeful Triple 9.

    13OTHELLO-master1050.jpg

    Personally, I’d rather they did something new. Craig was a huge departure from the pretty boy Pierce Brosnan types mentioned back in 2004-5. I was something interesting this time around. I’m really not interested in seeing a Tom Hiddleston, Aidan Turner, Henry Cavill, James Norton type. They’re all a little uninspired.

    Can’t we have someone intriguing like Craig? Alternatively, an objectively great actor with serious clout like Michael Fassbender or Tom Hardy.

    I don’t want a boring and agreeable choice (I’m looking at you Aidan Turner)

    Not really a fair statement, but OK.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited February 2017 Posts: 23,883
    Unfortunately, you’re right. I thought the climate may have been right for a black actor in the role but things have taken a turn. 2016 happened. The internet has created an outlet for people to spread hate and vitriol.

    Just look at the hate the pretty innocuous idea of having female Ghostbusters caused? That film crashed and burned at the box office, despite strong reviews. You need fan support to create buzz. Message boards and comment sections are lethal these days and can kill the word. People feel a legitimate ownership over these properties and don’t want the fundamental fabric of them tampered with. Plus Trump and Brexit have started to legitimise racism and hate.

    I think Eon will pay attention – it doesn’t make good commercial sense to have a black actor currently. Maybe back in 2006 it would have worked, but not today.
    I think whoever succeeds Craig is going to have a difficult time just because of social media. As you note, it's out of control and everyone needs to have their say. Bond is an icon, so there will always be a segment who don't like the choice. I'm sure there will be a group that make a fuss that the next actor isn't black.

    My earlier comment was more in relation to the global audience, which is growing. While North American and British fans may accept a black actor in the role (with reservations), I don't think it will be sellable globally, including in Asia. Moreover, the change for the sake of change may turn off some fans.
    suavejmf wrote: »
    Yes and No. From an economic viewpoint it is less likely that Bond would be black. He is an officer in the navy (it is quite a rare for high ranking officers to be black). Also he is a public school boy. Black people are still the lowest paid ethnic group in the UK. But that's beside the point as there is no point in changing the classic character just to be PC.
    Fair points. I went to an English boy's public school some decades back and I have the entire school photo above my computer. There are several Indian blokes but only two black ones in the entire photo. I never noticed that before. I agree that change to accommodate a pc outlook isn't appropriate, but if there was an outstanding candidate, I'd be open to him. The chances of that are slim just on a pure probability level (there is a far smaller pool of choices).
  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 5,131
    Exactly. I went to a very affluent School in a very affluent town. There were 2x black students out of 1500 pupils. They were my friend and his sister both adopted at birth by a rich white family. 20 miles down the road in a poorer city suburb it is highly ethnic, poor, poor performing schools and high crime rate. Just facts of life in the UK. Whether people want to be PC, admit or not.....Black people are still the lowest paid ethnic group in the UK are not as likely to be high racking naval/ secret service officials, privately educated, or live in Chelsea (like Bond).....so forgetting Fleming's description, forgetting cinema grosses etc......it is just less feasible that Elba is a plausible Bond.
  • cwl007cwl007 England
    Posts: 611
    I've just watched War on Everyone, not a bad movie. But what stood out for me is what a good Bond Alexander Scarsgard would make. The character in the movie isn't even 'Bondlike' but you can see that he could do it. I mentioned his name a few pages back and I'm even more convinced now. He is at the right point in his career, not too big or massively well known and he looks right physically. (I also know, in case any one points it out, that he is Swedish, but so what) He is 40 years old but looks younger.

  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Not sure about him being a potential Bond actor, but he was brilliant in War On Everyone. Enjoyed the film a lot!
  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 5,131
    Good actor, but automatic rejection. Brit's only club for the role of Bond.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Agreed. Great actor, but not Bond material.
  • cwl007cwl007 England
    Posts: 611
    Thanks guys for the measured response, I felt a bit nervous throwing that out. On the Brit angle, do you think it really matters, like really matters, whether or not Bond is played by a British actor. Good actors can become anyone by their very nature and I think that a non Brit who is right in every respect except their nationality is better than a sub par but British actor. I'm not necessarily
    referring to Scarsgard here just actors in general because really decent Brits for the role are proving tricky to pin down at the moment.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Bond doesn t have to be British of course, but Skarsgård should stick to Tarzan.
  • dominicgreenedominicgreene The Eternal QOS Defender
    edited February 2017 Posts: 1,756
    Ryan Gosling fits the mold:
    Ryan-Gosling-Drive-movie-image-2.jpg

    A good looking dude but in an untraditional way. Looks like he could seduce but could intimidate equally as well. He's stylish and masculine. His voice is good as well. I don't even need to mention his sex appeal.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    Ryan Gosling fits the mold:

    A good looking dude but in an untraditional way. Looks like he could seduce but could intimidate equally as well. He's stylish and masculine. His voice is good as well. I don't even need to mention his sex appeal.
    I don't see him as Bond personally, but I agree that he is a very cool customer, particular in Murder by Numbers and Fractured, where he is very smooth with Bond alum Rosamund Pike.
Sign In or Register to comment.