It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Totally agree. There both wrong but at least Bloom has movie star quality. Turner has star quality for say Coronation Street.
I was more commenting on Turner exhibiting some characteristics in the Christie adaptation which reminded me of a daily soap star.
No. Just saying how poor a choice Turner would be.
They hate him, because you are making such a fool of yourself and sorta of him with throwing him into peoples faces ALL the time. This is why.
If Turner is cast I think it might be Brosnan 2.0.
That's what I think will happen - Another GoldenEye type film. :D
Absolutely.
And an overall lacklustre tenure with an average Bond unable to give a creative influx to the series.
Anyway I do think Turner can bring something to the franchise: girls who would find him cute. Commercially he might even be the right choice. But like I say, it would be Brosnan 2.0.
2nd choice: Dan Stephens
3rd choice: Hiddleston
4th choice: Alex Scarsgard
5th voice: Hardy
6th choice: Scott Eastwood (an American, yikes)
All 6 would be great IMO and would all bring a different version.
I've always found Gosling one-note with a fake deep voice. He was horrible in GANGSTER SQUAD when he had to play a man's man--
In DRIVE it was the stylized directing that elevated the material.
I truly find Gosling a pussy-- and I'm Canadian... BUT, he would be a better choice than Hiddles and Turner...