It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I suppose. I never saw other advertising apart from the trailer. I also heard or read much earlier that the book was crap, too, so I never had the slightest interest in the movie in the first place. - But admittedly most movies people flock in to see hold no interest for me.
I do watch crap sometimes (I mean even when knowing beforehand the movie won't be any good), if people whose work I'm interested in are involved, but that one didn't have that aspect, either.
As for playing into fantasies, nothing wrong with that, a lot of movies do that (like, um, Bond, eh?), but if they do it badly, well... that's just not rewarding in any way. I know plenty people saw that movie, but I don't know how many actually enjoyed it, perhaps most didn't. Or hell, maybe they did? I'm sure some must have even liked that trailer enough to go see it, so...
this sums it up quite nicely:
http://deadline.com/2016/02/razzie-awards-winners-2016-full-list-golden-raspberry-awards-1201710388/
The reveal is in the video, not in a press statement. A few days after the video is hosted online there can follow a press conference. :)
hahahaha no. just no. Well, for Bond girls, sure. ;-)
http://www.thewrap.com/christopher-nolan-endorses-tom-hardy-james-bond-hed-amazing/amp/
They will come as a pair.
But if Nolan isn't ready for Bond 25, then Hardy will be too old surely? If Hardy is going to Bond, it has to be Bond 25 IMO.
Unless they just do a one off Bond adventure. A one film tenure.
Does that mean he would write all three, direct the first one, then produce the last two with Babs (because he may not want to be locked into a decade-worth of directorial duties on one character/story-line)?
Who knows, but, out of all the names to replace Craig, at least this is interesting (especially if Hardy came pre-packaged with Nolan), and would get me excited.
Exactly. I think they would want a Nolan trilogy, which is why they would have to start with Bond 25, surely? If not then Hardy would be 44 at least by the time they started.
You may well be right their Barry?
My money is on Bond 26 for Nolan? As for Hardy and his age by then? If they did come as a pair? And Nolan already has his own vision potentially over a 3 movie period? Perhaps the pair would start immediately once DC steps down and churn a film out every 2 years to factor in Hardy's age?
This one, then
Jack Lowden. 27 years old
(I joke-- I'm seeing Dunkirk tomorrow-- what were your thoughts?)
RE: Dunkirk: I posted a spoiler free review in the Last Movie You Watched thread. It's very different from anything Nolan has done before (almost no dialogue, so it's like a silent film in a way). It's a visceral sonic/visual experience like no other. Very immediate and intense. I really enjoyed it and highly recommend it.
I can't wait!
I understand but it is a silly assumption.
And although I know nothing about Lowden and think he's too young I'm glad some people are suggesting actors not pushing 40 already.