Who should/could be a Bond actor?

13913923943963971231

Comments

  • Posts: 2,917
    fanbond123 wrote: »
    Either he was greedy or they didn't have many actors to choose from back then!

    Tarzan, Flash Gordon and Buck Rogers were also regarded as trashier roles back then--the films starring those characters were B-movies or serials cranked out by the studios and held in low regard. Ditto for films with Bond precursors like the Saint, back when he was played by George Sanders and his brother Tom Conway.

    The James Bond films were notable giving (what Hollywood regarded as) B-movie material an A movie treatment. The same thing happened with Star Wars (posh Buck Rogers) and Indiana Jones (posh serial fodder). The increasing prominence and respect given to these films also meant that their stars took on more importance. So an actor who plays a legacy character today has to work harder to make the role his own. An actor who plays multiple legacy characters at the same time has to work harder. That's a roundabout way of saying Cavill probably won't get a crack at Bond until he's done with Superman.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,205
    If Cavill was not ready to jump into the role of Bond as soon as it’s available, regardless of his status as Superman, he wouldn’t be so publicly, with great enthusiasm, saying that he would say yes if asked.
  • 00Agent00Agent Any man who drinks Dom Perignon '52 can't be all bad.
    Posts: 5,185
    Regarding Cavill, hear it from Tom Cruise himself :D :

    at 1:53
  • Posts: 15,115
    Revelator wrote: »
    fanbond123 wrote: »
    Either he was greedy or they didn't have many actors to choose from back then!

    Tarzan, Flash Gordon and Buck Rogers were also regarded as trashier roles back then--the films starring those characters were B-movies or serials cranked out by the studios and held in low regard. Ditto for films with Bond precursors like the Saint, back when he was played by George Sanders and his brother Tom Conway.

    The James Bond films were notable giving (what Hollywood regarded as) B-movie material an A movie treatment. The same thing happened with Star Wars (posh Buck Rogers) and Indiana Jones (posh serial fodder). The increasing prominence and respect given to these films also meant that their stars took on more importance. So an actor who plays a legacy character today has to work harder to make the role his own. An actor who plays multiple legacy characters at the same time has to work harder. That's a roundabout way of saying Cavill probably won't get a crack at Bond until he's done with Superman.

    I'm wondering if the trouble DC has been having with their movies might actually be a liability for Cavill as a Bond contender. And he hasn't been exactly praised for Superman.
  • 00Agent00Agent Any man who drinks Dom Perignon '52 can't be all bad.
    edited July 2018 Posts: 5,185
    Quizzed by Yahoo earlier this week, Cavill says he's ready for Bond if the 007 producers were looking for a star for the 26th and subsequent pictures.

    "I think Bond would be a really fun role. It’s British, it’s cool. I think that now that I have my Mission: Impossible badge we can do real stunts and really amp it up as well." Mission: Impossible, like Bond before it, relies heavily on the 'wow' factor of new stunts, done for real and Tom Cruise, who plays Ethan Hunt in the series, is intent on doing as much as possible.

    Whilst some might think it far-fetched that Superman could seamlessly transition into Bond, in fact, in his early 20s Cavill auditioned for a role in the James Bond franchise as a replacement for Pierce Brosnan. The part ultimately went to the older and more established actor, Daniel Craig, but never say never! After all, Brosnan and Timothy Dalton before him both had to turn down the part before being welcomed back more than a decade later.

    Cavill has added that whilst his higher-profile parts have all be in the action/adventure genre, he's not opposed to branching out. "I’m up for any genre it’s just the scripts have to be good and that’s important to me", he said.

    /
    And here i thought he's only in it for thr money :-?
  • Posts: 348
    I personally believe they won't go for a star, especially one with limited talent and questionable box office appeal. Also still wanting the role that they did not choose him when he tested for before, no matter how close he got.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,205
    From Moore, to Dalton then Brosnan, Eon has a history of casting actors who had not gotten, or taken, the role when initially considered. As far as questionable box office, none of the actors chosen were themselves box office draws.
  • Posts: 348
    talos7 wrote: »
    From Moore, to Dalton then Brosnan, Eon has a history of casting actors who had not gotten, or taken, the role when initially considered. As far as questionable box office, none of the actors chosen were themselves box office draws.

    Moore didn't even know they'd considered him, so he didn't get to screen test, Brosnan couldn't get out of a contract. Dalton is a bit different, but there's different versions of his story. Though I'm sure none of this is relevant to you.
  • Posts: 9,846
    If Henry Cavill was going to be the next 007 I would honestly be fine with that again he is not my first second or third choice but I wouldn’t mind
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    M_Blaise wrote: »
    I personally believe they won't go for a star, especially one with limited talent and questionable box office appeal[/]. Also still wanting the role that they did not choose him when he tested for before, no matter how close he got.

    This is somewhat irrelevant. The character is the draw not the actor when it comes to Bond.
  • Posts: 348
    doubleoego wrote: »
    M_Blaise wrote: »
    I personally believe they won't go for a star, especially one with limited talent and questionable box office appeal[/]. Also still wanting the role that they did not choose him when he tested for before, no matter how close he got.

    This is somewhat irrelevant. The character is the draw not the actor when it comes to Bond.

    True, but it might show how much people like him, previous Bonds didn't have those sorts of opportunities, I don't think.
  • imranbecksimranbecks Singapore
    Posts: 984
    Henry Cavill would be perfect imo. Didn't he try out for Bond prior to Casino Royale? Remember that he also advertised for a Dunhill fragrance commercial many years ago which was very Bond like as well...
  • 00Agent00Agent Any man who drinks Dom Perignon '52 can't be all bad.
    edited July 2018 Posts: 5,185
    Thanks @imranbecks
    Apparently he did a couple. This one has good quality:


    He just has the perfect look about him (when slimmed down)
    But he also has a natural cool confidence and suaveness about him that half the suggestions on here couldn't act even if their life depended on it
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    edited July 2018 Posts: 8,205
    M_Blaise wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    From Moore, to Dalton then Brosnan, Eon has a history of casting actors who had not gotten, or taken, the role when initially considered. As far as questionable box office, none of the actors chosen were themselves box office draws.

    Moore didn't even know they'd considered him, so he didn't get to screen test, Brosnan couldn't get out of a contract. Dalton is a bit different, but there's different versions of his story. Though I'm sure none of this is relevant to you.

    You are correct none of it is relevant because none of it changes the accuracy of what I posted.
    For any number of reasons Eon has been willing to revisit an actor who had been previously considered.

  • Posts: 348
    talos7 wrote: »
    M_Blaise wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    From Moore, to Dalton then Brosnan, Eon has a history of casting actors who had not gotten, or taken, the role when initially considered. As far as questionable box office, none of the actors chosen were themselves box office draws.

    Moore didn't even know they'd considered him, so he didn't get to screen test, Brosnan couldn't get out of a contract. Dalton is a bit different, but there's different versions of his story. Though I'm sure none of this is relevant to you.

    You are correct none of it is relevant because none of it changes the accuracy of what I posted.
    For any number of reasons Eon has been willing to revisit an actor who had been previously considered.

    It does change the accuracy though, when the things you have said are misleading. That's all I have to say about this as you tend to say the same thing to everyone who disagrees with you (or corrects you).
  • Posts: 19,339
    "Have I taken over this thread,or what ?"

    henry.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=618&h=410&crop=1

  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,205
    Everyone, no; It’s obvious that you and I see things differently.
    As far as misleading, not a bit, possibly you’re projecting.

    This is on point and to the point:

    For any number of reasons Eon has been willing to revisit an actor who had been previously considered
  • 00Agent00Agent Any man who drinks Dom Perignon '52 can't be all bad.
    edited July 2018 Posts: 5,185
    barryt007 wrote: »
    "Have I taken over this thread,or what ?"

    henry.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=618&h=410&crop=1

    Lets enjoy it while it lasts

    tumblr_ogt5dpYEUs1sxwyufo2_500.gif
    (for that gif alone i would give him the job)
  • Posts: 1,661
    I think Henry must be loving this thread. Apparently he looks at Superhero forums and Superman threads (!) - well, he said he did in an interview - so who knows, he might pop in here and have a look. Henry, if you're reading this... er.. some people want you as Bond. But some don't! Ha ha.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,205
    :D
  • Posts: 19,339
    fanbond123 wrote: »
    I think Henry must be loving this thread. Apparently he looks at Superhero forums and Superman threads (!) - well, he said he did in an interview - so who knows, he might pop in here and have a look. Henry, if you're reading this... er.. some people want you as Bond. But some don't! Ha ha.

    I do !!!!!
  • edited July 2018 Posts: 1,661

    tumblr_ogt5dpYEUs1sxwyufo2_500.gif
    (for that gif alone i would give him the job)

    77qV.gif

    ;)

  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    00Agent wrote: »
    tumblr_ogt5dpYEUs1sxwyufo2_500.gif
    (for that gif alone i would give him the job)
    Better make that two. :D
  • Posts: 17,753
    00Agent wrote: »
    tumblr_ogt5dpYEUs1sxwyufo2_500.gif
    (for that gif alone i would give him the job)

    giphy.gif
    Not quite on Rog's level, but getting there!
  • Posts: 19,339
    You MI6'ers are a weird weird bunch,i cant tell you apart !! :

    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTKiVz23WrJK7n0Bx2YauHJlKz8b8EzRiHb2EQNgFa6ynYo_szW
  • 00Agent00Agent Any man who drinks Dom Perignon '52 can't be all bad.
    edited July 2018 Posts: 5,185
    lol
    Well, the most important thing though is

    caredfor-1430406242.gif
  • Posts: 15,115
    I'm surprised how Cavill seems popular. It wasn't the case say a year ago from what I remember.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,205
    From all reports he's outstanding in MI:F; that's prompting people give him a look, or second look.
  • edited July 2018 Posts: 19,339
    I think he used the role as an audition for Bond.
    A clever move and excellent timing to 'pull it out of the bag' as it seems he has done,with Craig on his way out,and Cavill still being only 35 until next May.

    He is getting plaudits everywhere.
  • Posts: 17,753
    giphy.gif
    If not Cavill, what about this guy!
Sign In or Register to comment.