› ›

Odd One Out

1…1819212324…117

Comments

  • goldenswissroyalegoldenswissroyale Switzerland
    Posts: 4,490
    At least two titles with kill, live or No. OHMSS is the only title with completely different words?
  • Max_The_ParrotMax_The_Parrot ATAC to St Cyril’s
    Posts: 2,426
    goldenswissroyale wrote: »
    At least two titles with kill, live or No. OHMSS is the only title with completely different words?

    Would you not say live and living are different words?

    On a similar idea though, it could be OHMSS because all the others have at least one word that is used in another Bond title, OHMSS doesn’t.

    Alternately, could be NTTD as that’s the only title that has two words also used in other Bond titles (I think?)

  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    It is none of the above.
  • Max_The_ParrotMax_The_Parrot ATAC to St Cyril’s
    Posts: 2,426
    Thunderfinger wrote: »
    It is none of the above.

    I reckon I need to search out a Bond for Beginners quiz thread! 😂😇

    I’ll keep thinking! 👍

  • goldenswissroyalegoldenswissroyale Switzerland
    Posts: 4,490
    All movies are the first or the last movie of a Bond actor. OHMSS is both at the same time. OHMSS is the ooo?
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Good thinking, but it is not that.
  • RichardTheBruceRichardTheBruce I'm motivated by my Duty.
    Posts: 13,926
    All are Bond films with Fleming titles and have Fleming story content, excepting NTTD.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    True, but it has nothing to do with the titles.
  • goldenswissroyalegoldenswissroyale Switzerland
    Posts: 4,490
    NTTD features a 007 but this time it is a woman.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    It has nothing to do with 007.
  • thedovethedove hiding in the Greek underworld
    Posts: 5,482
    I might be incorrect but what the hell, nothing ventured nothing gained. NTTD is the only one without any involvement of John Glen? Course I am not sure Glen had any role in DN or LALD.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    edited September 2019 Posts: 45,489
    thedove wrote: »
    I might be incorrect but what the hell, nothing ventured nothing gained. NTTD is the only one without any involvement of John Glen? Course I am not sure Glen had any role in DN or LALD.

    He did not.

    Let me also remind everyone that these seven films all have something in common.
  • thedovethedove hiding in the Greek underworld
    Posts: 5,482
    All films have an aspect of Doctor's in them. However TLD is odd one out as the Doctor in that film is fake as it's Koskov pretending to be a doctor?
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Very good, but incorrect.
  • thedovethedove hiding in the Greek underworld
    Posts: 5,482
    All have an angle of drugs within them.

    DN is odd one out as it's the only one where Bond directly drugged by the villain?

    DN drugged with coffee
    OHMSS drugs with the angels of death
    LALD heroin with Mr Big
    TLD the opium with Koskov
    LTK the cocaine of Sanchez
    NTTD the germ warfare angle of the plot
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Another good suggestion, but not what I have in mind. It does not revolve around the plot.
  • goldenswissroyalegoldenswissroyale Switzerland
    Posts: 4,490
    A hint would be appreciated.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    All right, it has to do with people.
  • thedovethedove hiding in the Greek underworld
    Posts: 5,482
    All films Bond has an ally. In all but one that ally is either Felix or CIA. All except OHMSS where the ally is a fellow Mi6 agent. Therefore OHMSS is odd one out.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    ImmaterialOrdinaryLacewing-size_restricted.gif
    Not quite my thinking.
  • goldenswissroyalegoldenswissroyale Switzerland
    Posts: 4,490
    All have two producers. One of them was always a Broccoli. Only in NTTD it is the next generation of the Broccolis: Barbara.
  • thedovethedove hiding in the Greek underworld
    Posts: 5,482
    Presumably I will be off base with this one but here it goes anyway! LOL!

    All have M featured outside his office. However only DN features M only in his office. So DN is odd one out for this reason.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Not that. The films mentioned have something more exclusively in common, but one of them is still different from the others.

    DN, OHMSS, LALD, AVTAK, TLD, LTK, NTTD.

    Think, folks! Think!

    Let me add that you need a little background info, just seeing the films won t solve it.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,511
    All came from the works of Ian Fleming, except for NTTD.
  • thedovethedove hiding in the Greek underworld
    Posts: 5,482
    I'm stumped. Your two clues are:

    It involves people and doesn't have anything to do with the plot
    It involves some background info that you won't find the answer just watching the films?

    All the films are either the start of one Bond or the swan song for a Bond. Only OHMSS is both? So therefore OHMSS is odd one out?
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Has been guessed already. Plus, that isn t exclusive for these films. Neither is the suggestion above.
  • thedovethedove hiding in the Greek underworld
    Posts: 5,482
    Oh I didn't know that the fact was only true of these films. Okay I may have to take a pass then.
  • goldenswissroyalegoldenswissroyale Switzerland
    Posts: 4,490
    We could need another thought-provoking impulse...
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,511
    This is strictly about the actors... two of them have something in common while playing James Bond (hint/hypothesis: I suspect future James Bond actors will also have this in common):

    Sean Connery, George Lazenby, Roger Moore, Timothy Dalton, Pierce Brosnan, Daniel Craig
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Does this mean people give up? It really isn t anything obscure or very hard.

    These films have something exclusively in common, but one of them is still different from the others.

    DN, OHMSS, LALD, AVTAK, TLD, LTK, NTTD.

    Hint: It is about people in front of the camera.

Sign In or Register to comment.