Why We Love Every Bond Actor

13»

Comments

  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts: 7,551
    suavejmf wrote: »
    Sean - The original and best. No dispute.
    George - Made one of the best films.
    Roger - The gentleman bond and Fleming's choice.
    Tim - Fleming's bond incarnate and the best films of the 80's.
    Brosnan - The 'safe pair of hands' but DAD is unfortunately the worst Bond fim by far!
    Daniel - The best bond since Connery. Class.

    That's certainly not an uncommon opinion around here it seems, but I'd say it's still arguable! DAD may be over the top silly, but it has Gustav Graves ( :x ) and can be quite entertaining, where as, and I'm ashamed to admit, one or two of the Moore films nearly put me to sleep ;)

    Welcome to the forums, @suavejmf!
  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 5,131
    Thanks. I just can't get over the CGI Kite Surfing or Graves Robocop style suit! Also why does Q have Rosa Clebbs boot in his underground lab? Futhermore, John Clease was awful as Q, more Austin Powersesque than 007.
  • Posts: 1,394
    suavejmf wrote: »
    Thanks. I just can't get over the CGI Kite Surfing or Graves Robocop style suit! Also why does Q have Rosa Clebbs boot in his underground lab? Futhermore, John Clease was awful as Q, more Austin Powersesque than 007.

    Perhaps Bond took them after Klebbs death as a souviner and gave them to Q cos he thought he might find them interesting?

  • SarkSark Guangdong, PRC
    Posts: 1,138
    So apart from a few early GoldenEye scenes he looked immaculate.

    Oh really

    DieAnotherDay-005.png

    I like this thread. While I have my favorites, I feel like anyone who says "he sucked" or "he was boring" is only selling themselves short.
  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 5,131
    Birdleson wrote: »
    That kind of scene in a Brosnan film, I had no problem with. The CGI and Jinx, and about 100 other things, I did have a problem with.

    I had a serious problem with John Cleese as Q though......'carry on-esque.'
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    edited March 2015 Posts: 15,423
    Sark wrote: »
    While I have my favorites, I feel like anyone who says "he sucked" or "he was boring" is only selling themselves short.
    That makes two of us. And the idea of classing Brosnan as "Austin Power-esque" is a little too much of an over the top and exaggerated statement. To say he was more like Derek Flint, I'd sort of agree with that. To say he was the Rambo/Commando interpretation of the character in terms of flavours, I agree with that, too. He wasn't spoof to begin with.

    As for my own reasoning for why I like each actor, here goes the list.

    Sean Connery: Cocky, Invulnerable, Patriotic and Indomitable Man with Class!
    George Lazenby: A very good fighter.
    Roger Moore: Humourous yet deadly, Casanova, Reasonable, and a man who loves his job.
    Timothy Dalton: The edginess and the kind way of treating his female companions (i.e. Kara Milovy) was enough to like him.
    Pierce Brosnan: The suave man of action, a professional secret agent with his head always in the game. A mixture of Connery and Moore. What more would I want from a Bond?
    Daniel Craig: Another good fighter, and someone who hates bureaucracy and modernism.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,800

    =D>
  • KerimKerim Istanbul Not Constantinople
    Posts: 2,629
    Sean wrote the blueprint.
    George gave the character emotion
    Roger made us laugh
    Timothy brought Ian Fleming back
    Pierce did the best with what he was given
    Daniel is the every man Bond.
  • MrcogginsMrcoggins Following in the footsteps of Quentin Quigley.
    Posts: 3,144
    Kerim wrote: »
    Sean wrote the blueprint.
    George gave the character emotion
    Roger made us laugh
    Timothy brought Ian Fleming back
    Pierce did the best with what he was given
    Daniel is the every man Bond.

    So So True.
  • DR-No-Sean-Connery.jpg
    Sean Connery

    hqdefault.jpg
    George Lazenby

    movies_50_years_of_bond_gallery_12.jpg
    Roger Moore

    ltk11.jpg
    Timothy Dalton

    DieAnotherDay-005.png
    Pierce Brosnan

    james-bond-daniel-craig-casino-royale.jpg
    Daniel Craig
  • edited March 2015 Posts: 1,394
    Sean Connery.....the original and best.
    George Lazenby......funny and good fighter.
    Roger Moore......terrific sense of humour and fun.
    Timothy Dalton....welcome harder edge.
    Pierce Brosnan.....the toughness of Connery and the suave of Moore

    Daniel Craig............................................
  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 5,131
    I would say Daniel Craig.......the toughness of Connery and the 'Englishness' of Moore.

    Brosnan......the safe pair of hands and the 'leading man' 007. He hasn't the toughness of Connery or the suaveness of Moore for me I'm afraid.
  • Posts: 533
    I love all six Bonds, because all of them portrayed the role in their individual styles.
  • AceHoleAceHole Belgium, via Britain
    edited April 2015 Posts: 1,731
    "Why We Love Every Bond Actor"

    Do we though... I mean do we have to? What's wrong with having a strong opinion one way or another?
    The simple test of who was a good Bond and who wasn't/isn't is quite straightforward really - do you feel like you are watching 007 when you watch the film?
    Of course it's subjective, it always will be.

    * Connery - yes, for all but DAF. This was some jowly, sluggish playboy, not James Bond

    * Lazenby - yes. He was athletic, graceful and had one of the best screenplays & scripts to work with. Would have been a disaster in a lesser Bondflick such as TMWTGG however.

    * Moore - yes, other than his debut. After that he worked to his strengths and made the role his own.

    * Dalton - yes. He was the purest celluloid incarnation of Fleming's vision.

    * Brosnan - no, other than for brief moments in TND. Pretty but neither really looked nor behaved like 007

    * Craig - yes. Never quite looks like 007 (nothing to do with hair colour), but most certainly acts it and makes you believe he has become James Bond.


    DAF, LALD, TWINE & DAD just don't feel like James Bond is actually in it at all, to me...
  • SzonanaSzonana Mexico
    Posts: 1,130

    Ok this is not a ranking, im mentioning each one in the order they appeared in the series.

    Sean Connery : he gave us James Bond without him the series probably wouldn't have continued but his fantastic performance is part of what made the prodcuers continue and feel like they had a franchise.
    He is the perfect package of looks, sex appeal, charm, sense of humor but can defend himself pretty well as an action man someone who can kill the bad guys in cold blood.

    George Lazenby: he gave this role more sentivity and heart. He was all charm and sweetness,he was able to be serious but in a different way than Sean Connery.

    Roger Moore : he was the king of sense of humor.
    He truly gave his films truly his owm spin, all his films have the Roger Moore stamp very well marked.

    Timothy Dalton : He was the ideal fleming Bond.
    His strenghts were in excelling with action, physicality and being not afraid to kill in cold blood when it was needed.

    Pierce Brosnan : he was the whole perfect package mixing all the strenghts of his predecesors but more than anything he is the Modern Sean Connery and im saying it as a compliment.

    Daniel Craig
    He was the most Bad ass Bond definitley being the best at being Dark and a man of action.
    What he lack in charisma, sex appeal, charm and humor makes it up for excelling in the other side of the character.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    edited August 2015 Posts: 17,800
    Birdleson wrote: »
    @AceHole , no, you don't have to love every Bond, but this thread was made, by @chrisisall I believe, to get away from the bashing and other crap all over these boards.
    Thank you.
    Well, my appreciation of Craig just keeps growing. QOS is steadily rising for me to the point that my last rankings needs to be rearranged soon. It's inside my top ten now.
    How things change...
    :-?
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    edited August 2015 Posts: 9,020
    Sean Connery:
    He gave us the best Bond (Dr.No to TB), he gave us the worst Bond (DAF).

    George Lazenby
    He received the best Bond movie ever. He managed not to damage that movie, for that we have to thank him.

    Roger Moore:
    He showed us that there can be a different take on Bond that is believable, successful and loved.

    Timothy Dalton:
    He is the Fleming Bond, sadly cut short which was not his fault.

    Pierce Brosnan:
    He saved the franchise with his perfect mix of Connery and Moore while still having his own identity. He is all in one.

    Daniel Craig:
    He is the serious, grim, relentless Bond. He never looks the part but acts the part and is the most believable 00 agent with a license to kill, even more than Connery.

    Dan Stevens:
    He is...will be...I'm getting carried away... :))
  • ForYourEyesOnlyForYourEyesOnly In the untained cradle of the heavens
    Posts: 1,984
    All the Bonds were great in their own way. Lazenby just happened to be the worst actor due to inexperience. When it comes to actual acting in their Bond films, Craig and Dalton are first and second, respectively.
Sign In or Register to comment.