BOND POLLS 2015: Best Bond-films "GoldenEye" until "Skyfall" •••FINAL RESULTS•••

1810121314

Comments

  • Posts: 1,146
    You opinion.
    Others have backed mine.
    (shrug)
    Certainly your dislike of my opinion comes through clearly!
    Much ado about a Bond thread, sir!
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    chrisisall wrote: »
    1-Tomorrow Never Dies
    2-GoldenEye
    3-Quantum of Solace
    4-Die Another Day
    5-Casino Royale
    6-The World Is Not Enough
    7-Skyfall
    For the record, 1, 2 & 7 are the same as my list.
    And I see you have a good suit.
    :D
    Yes, the other 10% is up to me. ;)
  • MayDayDiVicenzoMayDayDiVicenzo Here and there
    edited November 2014 Posts: 5,080
    You opinion.
    Others have backed mine.
    (shrug)
    Certainly your dislike of my opinion comes through clearly!
    Much ado about a Bond thread, sir!

    I don't give two tosses whether you like Moore or not. It's how you go about it. I've gone through it many times before, so I shan't repeat myself. And quite a few other members have expressed the same thing.
  • Posts: 1,146
    And others have supported my opinion, sir. That's what this thread is for, stating opinions and discussing, not trying to keep others from posting.
  • MayDayDiVicenzoMayDayDiVicenzo Here and there
    Posts: 5,080
    And others have supported my opinion, sir. That's what this thread is for, stating opinions and discussing, not trying to keep others from posting.

    Might I provide you with this-

    Getafix wrote: »

    If I am truly honest though, none of the Craig films rank amongst my favourites.

    Add me to that.

    You support OP and it's ilk but waver on these Craig films?

    Is this, or is it not, completely irrelevant to the threads purpose, and deliberately provocative?

    This is exactly what I'm talking about.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,829
    This is exactly what I'm talking about.
    Some peeps join a site to grind their axe... I'd rather revel in actual discussion!
    The thing I like about most of Brosnan's Bonds is the way they embrace the absurd. True, Tim's take & movies are my favourite, but if they're serving up purely cinematic Bond, Pierce surely satisfies (me, anyway).
  • Posts: 1,146
    And others have supported my opinion, sir. That's what this thread is for, stating opinions and discussing, not trying to keep others from posting.

    Might I provide you with this-

    Getafix wrote: »

    If I am truly honest though, none of the Craig films rank amongst my favourites.

    Add me to that.

    You support OP and it's ilk but waver on these Craig films?

    Is this, or is it not, completely irrelevant to the threads purpose, and deliberately provocative?

    This is exactly what I'm talking about.

    I've made my points and shall move on with the thread.
  • edited November 2014 Posts: 11,425
    I have some sympathy with @doubleohdad. While I don't agree with his clearly deeply misguided views on Sir Rog, I understand his need to relate everything back to his own anti-Bond. For me my own personal anti-Bond is the Broz, the man who ruined an entire decade of Bond fandom for me and stole the part from the legendary and soon to be knighted Mr. Timithy Dalton. When someone causes you so much hurt, it's hard to just forgive and forget. But as Jennifer Aniston said recently, bearing a grudge is pointless. "It's like eating rat poison and waiting for the rat to die." Wise words Jen. Or was that Silva? I get confused.
  • MayDayDiVicenzoMayDayDiVicenzo Here and there
    Posts: 5,080
    chrisisall wrote: »
    This is exactly what I'm talking about.
    Some peeps join a site to grind their axe... I'd rather revel in actual discussion!
    The thing I like about most of Brosnan's Bonds is the way they embrace the absurd. True, Tim's take & movies are my favourite, but if they're serving up purely cinematic Bond, Pierce surely satisfies (me, anyway).

    Indeed, I'm quite sick of this vicious circle. It will not continue; he can move it to a more appropriate thread if he is so inclined.

    As for Brosnan; certainly hold him in a much higher esteem than I did, say, a year ago. Always gives a strong performance, even when presented with something like DAD.

    Goldeneye is near cinematic Bond perfection.

  • edited November 2014 Posts: 11,425
    chrisisall wrote: »
    This is exactly what I'm talking about.
    Some peeps join a site to grind their axe... I'd rather revel in actual discussion!
    The thing I like about most of Brosnan's Bonds is the way they embrace the absurd. True, Tim's take & movies are my favourite, but if they're serving up purely cinematic Bond, Pierce surely satisfies (me, anyway).

    Brosnan's films are absurd alright.

    As to whether they embrace it or rather fall face first right into it is another matter.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,829
    Goldeneye is near cinematic Bond perfection.
    And here's where I will wax technical for a long moment: much has been made of the plane dive effect in GE, but it all comes down to money & time. The parachute drop in QOS was really no more convincing to me. And then there's the broader issue of CGI filled 'normal' shots.
    Now, I love the movie "Pacific Rim", and it's absolutely LOADED with inventive & cutting edge CGI, but it's all really a big cartoon movie anyway. Bond movies have been embracing CGI more and more- bits in GE, lots of real photography erasure/enhancement in TND, entire shots in TWINE culminating with entire SCENES constructed virtually for DAD... lesson learned? Eh, not really. Craig's movies have been blanketed with the stuff. In CR it was pretty limited and mostly seamless. In QOS it was spotty, but the beginnings of the addictive digital tweaking was evident (I was going to get QOS on Blu Ray the other day, but then I realized why? So I can spot the CGI better??). With SF we had buildings & lighting being played with... and I don't know about everyone else here, but a lot of the CGI in SF was pretty effin' distracting to me. Say what you want about obvious model shots in GE, but at least they were photographed THINGS that had a physical presence... so many shots in SF felt like my days in Photoshop class in college.
    And all this to say I agree with @MayDayDiVicenzo, Goldeneye is near cinematic Bond perfection. And I'd add TND to that, personally.

  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    I am sure that every single fan has his or her interpretation and visualization of the Bond world. Some consider the more comic book/camp-driven escapism their ideal universe, such as myself, while others cherish the darker tone given to the entry. We can't all like the same thing, that is why versatility is given to the series. Some might despise Roger Moore, I might not, for instance. I think there is everything for everyone in the entire Bond series. In @chrisisall 's defense, I do consider Brosnan's films quite entertaining and enjoyable, with GE and TND being perfection to some of us. Doesn't mean I don't like the other side of the coin, for The Living Daylights is one of my all-time favourite Bond films if we were to refer to Dalton. In the end, we all just get along because we all belong to the same league. The Bond Fandom. Am I right?
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,829
    Getafix wrote: »
    Brosnan's films are absurd alright.
    As to whether they embrace it or rather fall face first right into it is another matter.
    LOL, how you and I can agree so precisely in some instances & be so diametrically opposed in others is a source of endless confusion and amusement to me @Getafix...
    I do consider Brosnan's films quite entertaining and enjoyable, with GE and TND being perfection to some of us. Doesn't mean I don't like the other side of the coin, for The Living Daylights is one of my all-time favourite Bond films if we were to refer to Dalton. In the end, we all just get along because we all belong to the same league. The Bond Fandom. Am I right?
    Section 26, paragraph 5. Need-to-know. Sure you understand. :))
    Ha ha, yeah, I'm with you here. ;)
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    chrisisall wrote: »
    Section 26, paragraph 5. Need-to-know. Sure you understand. :))
    Ha ha, yeah, I'm with you here. ;)
    White Knight to White Rook. Message Received. Over. :)
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,829
    White Knight to White Rook. Message Received. Over. :)

    :)>-
  • Posts: 1,146
    chrisisall wrote: »
    Goldeneye is near cinematic Bond perfection.
    And here's where I will wax technical for a long moment: much has been made of the plane dive effect in GE, but it all comes down to money & time. The parachute drop in QOS was really no more convincing to me. And then there's the broader issue of CGI filled 'normal' shots.
    Now, I love the movie "Pacific Rim", and it's absolutely LOADED with inventive & cutting edge CGI, but it's all really a big cartoon movie anyway. Bond movies have been embracing CGI more and more- bits in GE, lots of real photography erasure/enhancement in TND, entire shots in TWINE culminating with entire SCENES constructed virtually for DAD... lesson learned? Eh, not really. Craig's movies have been blanketed with the stuff. In CR it was pretty limited and mostly seamless. In QOS it was spotty, but the beginnings of the addictive digital tweaking was evident (I was going to get QOS on Blu Ray the other day, but then I realized why? So I can spot the CGI better??). With SF we had buildings & lighting being played with... and I don't know about everyone else here, but a lot of the CGI in SF was pretty effin' distracting to me. Say what you want about obvious model shots in GE, but at least they were photographed THINGS that had a physical presence... so many shots in SF felt like my days in Photoshop class in college.
    And all this to say I agree with @MayDayDiVicenzo, Goldeneye is near cinematic Bond perfection. And I'd add TND to that, personally.

    I don't think we all have to have the same tastes to comment on the threads, and just being blind cheerleaders to anything is unhealthy. It's like when co-workers at a company say, 'We.'
    Who's' 'We?'

    'Cuz the company would cut us all loose in a second if it needed to.

    In the GE plane dive, there are shots that I would have cut, perhaps even stayed outside the plane, because some of the shots of Bros trying to get into the plane, holding the control stick, his POV, those shots undercut the believability of the sequence, which up to that point had been brilliant.
  • TripAcesTripAces Universal Exports
    Posts: 4,589
    1. Sf
    2. CR
    3. QoS
    4. GE
    5. TND
    6. DAD
    7. TWISNE
  • Posts: 1,146
    Getafix wrote: »
    I have some sympathy with @doubleohdad. While I don't agree with his clearly deeply misguided views on Sir Rog, I understand his need to relate everything back to his own anti-Bond. For me my own personal anti-Bond is the Broz, the man who ruined an entire decade of Bond fandom for me and stole the part from the legendary and soon to be knighted Mr. Timithy Dalton. When someone causes you so much hurt, it's hard to just forgive and forget. But as Jennifer Aniston said recently, bearing a grudge is pointless. "It's like eating rat poison and waiting for the rat to die." Wise words Jen. Or was that Silva? I get confused.

    I've come to the conclusion that as much as I like GE, the two Dalton Bonds are of better, or at least more consistent tone than the four Bros films. And other than GE, there's an intensity lacking in the Bros that Dalton has in spades.

    He's not afraid to put a gun or knife to a woman's neck or chin, but TWINE just butchered the kill scene with the villianess. Afraid to be bold.
  • Posts: 1,146
    chrisisall wrote: »
    This is exactly what I'm talking about.


    Goldeneye is near cinematic Bond perfection.

    I actually pretty much agree with this.
  • MrBondMrBond Station S
    Posts: 2,044
    A ranking would probably look something like this:

    Casino Royale
    Skyfall
    Quantum of Solace
    Goldeneye
    Tomorrow Never Dies
    Die Another Day
    The World Is Not Enough
  • Posts: 107
    Casino Royale
    Quantum of Solace
    Skyfall
    Die Another Day
    Tomorrow Never Dies
    Goldeneye (blechh)
    The World Is Not Enough (double blechh)

  • KronsteenKronsteen Stockholm
    Posts: 783
    I'll do a rare treat for myself and actually commenting on a post, it's not every day...

    1. Casino Royale
    2. Goldeneye
    3. Skyfall
    4. Die Another Day
    5. Tomorrow Never Dies
    6. The World Is Not Enough

    As a side note, TWINE was my first cinema Bond. Thought it was good back then, but rather quick it fell to be my least favourite. It just has so many faults, I can't enjoy it.

    CR is untouchably number 1. It doesn't reach my favourites from the 60s and 80s, but still a great Bond flick.
  • HASEROTHASEROT has returned like the tedious inevitability of an unloved season---
    Posts: 4,399
    hmm.. thought i voted on this one...

    1. Casino Royale
    2. Skyfall
    3. Goldeneye
    4. Tomorrow Never Dies
    5. Quantum Of Solace
    6. The World Is Not Enough
    7. Die Another Day
  • Posts: 1,146
    DAD has to be the worst film of that bunch.
  • 00Ralf00Ralf Germany
    edited December 2014 Posts: 149
    1. Tomorrow Never Dies
    2. Skyfall
    3. GoldenEye - it would've switched places with Skyfall if the score was composed by e.g. David Arnold and not Eric Serra
    4. Casino Royale
    5. The World Is Not Enough



    (bottomless chasm of nothing)



    6. Die Another Day
    7. Quantum Of Solace
  • Posts: 1,146
    There more coolness in the opening of QoS than in any of the last three Broz films. QoS does run out of story and is flawed, but way more interesting in terms of tone and action.
  • Posts: 12,522
    There more coolness in the opening of QoS than in any of the last three Broz films. QoS does run out of story and is flawed, but way more interesting in terms of tone and action.

    Agreed on the first part. I also think the story also isn't any worse than Brosnan's last 3. I wouldn't call the story "strong", but I thought it was fine.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,829
    00Ralf wrote: »
    1. Tomorrow Never Dies

    7. Quantum Of Solace
    We agree so completely on #1, yet #7, not so much. Strange.
  • 00Ralf00Ralf Germany
    Posts: 149
    What I mainly dislike about QOS are:
    - The opening song
    - The rough 'kick-you-in-the-face' attitude of Bond. I get it that this portrayal is closer to Fleming's novels, but after getting rid of all the subtle wit we got used to in the previous movies it just felt like a regular action movie and not a Bond film.
    - The forgettable villain

    In my opinion, Skyfall fixed all that by giving the viewer references to previous Bond films, explanations for the changes (for example M's speech at court or Q mentioning they don't make gadgets like exploding pens anymore), a truly mad villain we'll remember and a stunning intro theme. It felt like going back to the roots of what made the movie franchise a worldwide phenomenon.

    Sidenote: QOS is not all bad, it does have some good scenes too. The opera sequence, for instance.
    Anyway, the list made me give the movie another chance. I'm watching it right now. ;)
Sign In or Register to comment.