It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Yep. The notion that DAF is relatively non-violent is, well, DAFt.
Don't think there is anything wrong with offending people from time to time, as long as you do it with class
:P
In fact it's probably one of the more violenct Bond films. Top half at least.
Another contender could be Moonraker; other than the obviously horrifying death of Corrine Dufour in the forest, I can't think of anything that would be considered too violent, especially considering the fact that the finale consists of deaths caused by fictional laser guns that don't leave a graphic impact on camera.
Goldfinger probably gets my vote. Pretty tame all around.
By "violent" I thought we were judging the violence shown on screen. Like Krest's head exploding in LTK or Bond clearly shooting that guard in the head in OP. In YOLT all you see is two people screaming in a pool of water. But if by violence you mean what's implied than I guess you have a point about YOLT.
In terms of most "graphic" it's LTK hands down.
YOLT is a possibility. However, Bond's fight with the burly Japanese dude in the Osato building was fairly brutal.
Violent. :) the two school girls kick more arse than Bond. :D
And the death of his bride by poisoning. And the astronaut dying in space...
:)
Frustatingly so, I may add. Those darn girls mess up everything.
Quality over quantity.
As far as graphic violence it's pretty obviously LTK.