Why did they not replace Roger Moore in 1980?

179111213

Comments

  • edited January 2015 Posts: 1,146
    sorry. double-post.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,823
    Murdock wrote: »
    chrisisall wrote: »
    Getafix wrote: »
    Sadly they did replace Dalton in 95 and we got the abysmal Brosnan.
    I'm tired of the Brosnan hate. Are you & doubleohdad the same guy harping on your two pet peeves? Are you trying to drive me off this site? Because you're both doing a wonderful job of making me consider it....
    8-|

    Please don't go @chrisisall.

    I'm not there yet. And thanks for chiming in... it's just that I can't express myself fully here how disgusted I am with the hatred. I started the negativity thread in the hopes that it might be a release valve for the crap, and it maybe worked a tiny bit, but I respect Moore a whole LOT, and Brozz is a solid favourite (even in DAD), and I don't know why all the bs has to directed at them, as if THEY had a say in how the movies were produced or written or directed. At the very LEAST Dalton hasn't been much of a target...
    I'm watching my Blu Ray of YOLT at the moment, and Connery is great in it, but I suspect in saying THAT, 'some usual suspects' will want to say what a s**t movie THAT is too, and how Connery was naff in it.
    I don't want a homogenized cheerleading squad here, but a little respect for the hard work on the part of the actors at least would go a very long way IMHO.

    Okay, rant over.

    On topic- Moore rocked in OP!!!

  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,357
    With doubleohdad's constant hate on Moore and Getafix's constant hate on Brosnan, it gets really boring quick.
  • TheWizardOfIceTheWizardOfIce 'One of the Internet's more toxic individuals'
    Posts: 9,117
    I'e given credit to the Moore stuff when due.

    When did that ever happen? One 6 word post along the lines of 'The PTS in OP is good' just to try and get the mods off your back hardly makes up for the infinite repetition of 'Moores films arent very good. Dont take it on trust - look its on Rotten Tomatoes so it must be true'.

    You claim you want debate but youve got absolutely nothing in your locker apart from your 3 stock phrases.

    Uhhhhhhh…….nope. I've stated the stuff that's good and bad for both the connery and moore films throughout these threads, it's just that there's so much more bad in the Moore films than the Connery films.

    Blow up Katanga.

    awful southern sheriff.

    gondola gags that border on diabolical

    to tiger: "Sit!"

    Jaws drops a brick on his foot like daffy duck

    old man moore hitting on far too young women

    no memorable fights

    Jaws FALLS IN LOVE

    double-take pidgeon

    godawful tennis match

    godawful hockey match

    I could go on and on….

    If some of these films got a C- on RT, they should be grateful because they deserve far worse.

    Bond as a clown

    Bond in a gorilla suit

    I think that was more than three, right?

    Now, before anyone complains, I was responding to a previous question.

    You forgot 'flopping about on trains in OP' which is my personal favourite of yours despite the staggering lack of respect it shows for the immense work done by Martin Grace in that sequence.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,823
    Murdock wrote: »
    With doubleohdad's constant hate on Moore and Getafix's constant hate on Brosnan, it gets really boring quick.
    You and @4EverBonded are my anchors here, my friend! Without you two I might actually be gone by now.
    OH! Aki just switched with the other girl! Damn I love these movies!
    :))
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,357
    chrisisall wrote: »
    Murdock wrote: »
    With doubleohdad's constant hate on Moore and Getafix's constant hate on Brosnan, it gets really boring quick.
    You and @4EverBonded are my anchors here, my friend! Without you two I might actually be gone by now.
    OH! Aki just switched with the other girl! Damn I love these movies!
    :))

    Don't forget Creasy too. :)
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,823
    Murdock wrote: »
    Don't forget Creasy too. :)
    Yes, of course, I'm distracted at the moment; Aki is serving under Bond...
    :\">
  • SarkSark Guangdong, PRC
    Posts: 1,138
    I'e given credit to the Moore stuff when due.

    When did that ever happen? One 6 word post along the lines of 'The PTS in OP is good' just to try and get the mods off your back hardly makes up for the infinite repetition of 'Moores films arent very good. Dont take it on trust - look its on Rotten Tomatoes so it must be true'.

    You claim you want debate but youve got absolutely nothing in your locker apart from your 3 stock phrases.

    Uhhhhhhh…….nope. I've stated the stuff that's good and bad for both the connery and moore films throughout these threads, it's just that there's so much more bad in the Moore films than the Connery films.

    Blow up Katanga.

    awful southern sheriff.

    gondola gags that border on diabolical

    to tiger: "Sit!"

    Jaws drops a brick on his foot like daffy duck

    old man moore hitting on far too young women

    no memorable fights

    Jaws FALLS IN LOVE

    double-take pidgeon

    godawful tennis match

    godawful hockey match

    I could go on and on….

    If some of these films got a C- on RT, they should be grateful because they deserve far worse.

    Bond as a clown

    Bond in a gorilla suit

    I think that was more than three, right?

    Now, before anyone complains, I was responding to a previous question.

    Who here believes doubleohdad remembers all the off the top of his head from a viewing by his own accounts more than 30 years ago?
  • HASEROTHASEROT has returned like the tedious inevitability of an unloved season---
    Posts: 4,399
    I'e given credit to the Moore stuff when due.

    When did that ever happen? One 6 word post along the lines of 'The PTS in OP is good' just to try and get the mods off your back hardly makes up for the infinite repetition of 'Moores films arent very good. Dont take it on trust - look its on Rotten Tomatoes so it must be true'.

    You claim you want debate but youve got absolutely nothing in your locker apart from your 3 stock phrases.

    Uhhhhhhh…….nope. I've stated the stuff that's good and bad for both the connery and moore films throughout these threads, it's just that there's so much more bad in the Moore films than the Connery films.

    Blow up Katanga.

    awful southern sheriff.

    gondola gags that border on diabolical

    to tiger: "Sit!"

    Jaws drops a brick on his foot like daffy duck

    old man moore hitting on far too young women

    no memorable fights

    Jaws FALLS IN LOVE

    double-take pidgeon

    godawful tennis match

    godawful hockey match

    I could go on and on….

    If some of these films got a C- on RT, they should be grateful because they deserve far worse.

    Bond as a clown

    Bond in a gorilla suit

    I think that was more than three, right?

    Now, before anyone complains, I was responding to a previous question.

    You forgot 'flopping about on trains in OP' which is my personal favourite of yours despite the staggering lack of respect it shows for the immense work done by Martin Grace in that sequence.

    @TheWizardOfIce

    his "flopping about" comment makes as much sense as an argument against, as Connery's awful punch to knock out a guard in FRWL - i've seen more believable punches thrown in pro wrestling lol.
  • MayDayDiVicenzoMayDayDiVicenzo Here and there
    edited January 2015 Posts: 5,080
    Yes, don't go @chrisisall. I myself had to take a little hiatus, and it helped.
    It has come to the point now when a real discussion cannot be had in multiple threads because of the constant vitriol. As we all know all too well on this forum, things can turn nasty real quick. But I too am sick of the crap that both Rog and Brozzer receive on a daily, hourly basis.
    But don't go, certainly not because of doubleohdad. I'm sure his time will come.

    @TheWizardOfIce My personal favourite of his is "Octopussy MUST be bad because at one point, you could watch on YouTube". Classic.
  • SirHilaryBraySirHilaryBray Scotland
    edited January 2015 Posts: 2,138
    I think a lot was to do with the relationship between Moore and the Broccoli family, Moore and Cubby were great friends as well as collaborators. Having split from Saltzman I think Cubby hung on to who he trusted and worked hard for him. For all the lames jokes, age and general issues people bring up about Moore, he was loyal and he always worked hard. Such a gentleman and still as always a great supporter of the franchise.
  • "Flopping about on a train?" I thought he liked tough guys. They didn't come much tougher than Martin Grace.

    Rise above it all @chrisisall. If you need to, seek sanctuary in the Brosnan Appreciation Thread, or in the ultra-sophisticated, cocktail-sipping, virtual cigar-smoking, (ever-so-slightly tongue-in-cheek) Moore one. The mods here are very fair-minded and extremely generous but I think a line should be drawn in the sand when it comes to Appreciation Threads. We all need a respite, on occasion; somewhere free from the brickbats and the draining, repetitive negativity.

    This thread has veered widely off topic but thank goodness they didn't replace Moore after FYEO. I love Octopussy and I can't quite imagine another Bond actor in that film. Sometimes it's simply okay to just be widely entertained by a Bond film. The gritty real world, personal issues, and everyday stresses and strains can wait - a rogue Russian general wants to detonate a nuclear bomb, Louis Jourdan is getting up to villainous things in impossibly romantic India, and 009 has been killed while clutching a Faberge egg - fortunately there is one man in a safari suit who can save us all. It's Rog time!

  • edited January 2015 Posts: 11,425
    @chrisisall - you're sounding a bit tired and emotional.
    chrisisall wrote: »
    Getafix wrote: »
    Sadly they did replace Dalton in 95 and we got the abysmal Brosnan.
    I'm tired of the Brosnan hate. Are you & doubleohdad the same guy harping on your two pet peeves? Are you trying to drive me off this site? Because you're both doing a wonderful job of making me consider it....
    8-|

    Sorry @chrisisall, with all the love I have for Sean, George, Rog, Tim and Dan, there's not much left over for Pierce as Bond. He's a lovely guy though, if that helps?

    It would be a huge shame if you left but threatening to leave is a little bit school playground isn't it?

    Now the crying's over, back on topic.

    If they'd got rid of Rog in 80 we'd never have got Chris Walken manically shooting his own goons in AVTAK and seen Bond cooking a quiche for the lovely Stacy Sutton. Two truly classic and surreal moments in the series.
  • NicNacNicNac Administrator, Moderator
    Posts: 7,584
    chrisisall wrote: »
    Getafix wrote: »
    Sadly they did replace Dalton in 95 and we got the abysmal Brosnan.
    I'm tired of the Brosnan hate. Are you & doubleohdad the same guy harping on your two pet peeves? Are you trying to drive me off this site? Because you're both doing a wonderful job of making me consider it....
    8-|

    A little debate is all it takes to get you to abandon ship?

    Here, go to this thread and spread some Sean love.
    http://www.mi6community.com/index.php?p=/discussion/3301/sean-connery-appreciation-and-news#latest
    Makes a change from negative posts elsewhere.
  • AceHoleAceHole Belgium, via Britain
    edited January 2015 Posts: 1,731
    I think it was just a question of risk vs. reward for Cubby & co.
    Sure, replacing Roger after MR or FYEO would have brought excitement and fresh impetus - but what if Brolin or some other horribly unsuitable bloke had been chosen and it didn't work?

    The crux of the matter is that there wasn't anyone better suited to the role available between '79 and '84. So you go with what works, even if it's rather tepid and uninspired.
  • Posts: 11,425
    AceHole wrote: »
    I think it was just a question of risk vs. reward for Cubby & co.
    Sure, replacing Roger after MR or FYEO would have brought excitement and fresh impetus - but what if Brolin or some other horribly unsuitable bloke had been chosen and it didn't work?

    The crux of the matter is that there wasn't anyone better suited to the role available between '79 and '84. So you go with what works, even if it's rather tepid and uninspired.

    I'm sure it's been mentioned already, but surely there were commercial considerations. As long as Sir Rog was reliably bringing in the punters at the box office, he was in a strong position with the producers. EON has long abided by the rule of 'if it aint broke, don't fix it'.
  • BennyBenny Shaken not stirredAdministrator, Moderator
    Posts: 15,163
    AceHole wrote: »
    I think it was just a question of risk vs. reward for Cubby & co.
    Sure, replacing Roger after MR or FYEO would have brought excitement and fresh impetus - but what if Brolin or some other horribly unsuitable bloke had been chosen and it didn't work?

    The crux of the matter is that there wasn't anyone better suited to the role available between '79 and '84. So you go with what works, even if it's rather tepid and uninspired.

    You bring up an excellent point there @AceHole.
    Why not replace Moore in 1980. The big question would've been with who?
    Roger Moore was an established and popular Bond / actor in the 70's and 80's. Spy and Moonraker had given the Bond series a fresh boost (in the pockets of EON), why wouldn't they want their star to continue. Audiences were happy to get a Bond film every two years. The old 'formula' style was still acceptable. Audiences didn't have access to script details or shooting locations. When a new film came out it was a surprise as to what happens. Now we know all of the secrets before hand.

  • Posts: 11,425
    Well there was Dalton in the wings...
  • HASEROTHASEROT has returned like the tedious inevitability of an unloved season---
    Posts: 4,399
    Getafix wrote: »
    Well there was Dalton in the wings...

    i know Dalton turned them down for OHMSS, but i thought he turned them down again in the early 80s - or he couldn't do it at the time......... i could be wrong.
  • AceHoleAceHole Belgium, via Britain
    edited January 2015 Posts: 1,731
    HASEROT wrote: »
    Getafix wrote: »
    Well there was Dalton in the wings...

    i know Dalton turned them down for OHMSS, but i thought he turned them down again in the early 80s - or he couldn't do it at the time......... i could be wrong.

    @ Getafix - I agree that Dalton circa 1980 would have been perfect( well, duh...) - but that's the point, I'm pretty sure he wasn't available or even refused.
  • Posts: 11,425
    All I mean is that there were other qualified actors around, so the reason they kept Rog was not that there weren't other people who could have played the role well (IMO).

    The fact that EON were speaking to Dalton in the early 80s shows that Rog staying in post was far from a foregone conclusion.

    I am huge fan of Rog and don't regret him having stayed on as long as he did at all. OP is one of my favourites. I guess I wouldn't have been too upset if we hadn't got AVTAK but one too many is better than one too few IMO. How much do I regret we didn't get a third Dalton...?!
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited January 2015 Posts: 23,883
    Getafix wrote: »
    If they'd got rid of Rog in 80 we'd never have got Chris Walken manically shooting his own goons in AVTAK and seen Bond cooking a quiche for the lovely Stacy Sutton. Two truly classic and surreal moments in the series.

    I'm pretty sure you're being sarcastic, but truth be told, I'd be ok with never having got this.

    I have nothing good to say about this entry apart from Duran Duran's title song, which is memorable enough. I know Dalton may have not accepted the role afer OP, but this entry really does stain Moore's great legacy for me, and I'm a big supporter of his generally. So, as I've said earlier in this thread, I would have prefered a post-OP exit for Moore.
  • AceHoleAceHole Belgium, via Britain
    Posts: 1,731
    Getafix wrote: »
    How much do I regret we didn't get a third Dalton...?!

    Please don't remind me. It is the greatest travesty in the history of cinema... ~X(
  • edited January 2015 Posts: 11,425
    bondjames wrote: »
    Getafix wrote: »
    If they'd got rid of Rog in 80 we'd never have got Chris Walken manically shooting his own goons in AVTAK and seen Bond cooking a quiche for the lovely Stacy Sutton. Two truly classic and surreal moments in the series.

    I'm pretty sure you're being sarcastic, but truth be told, I'd be ok with never having got this.

    I have nothing good to say about this entry apart from Duran Duran's title song, which is memorable enough. I know Dalton may have not accepted the role afer OP, but this entry really does stain Moore's great legacy for me, and I'm a big supporter of his generally. So, as I've said earlier in this thread, I would have prefered a post-OP exit for Moore.

    I'm being a bit sarcastic. AVTAK is a bit lame, but I do like the bit where Walken shoots his own men. And for the record, while I'm not exactly a 'fan' of May Day, I think Grace Jones actually injects some life into an otherwise largely moribund movie.

    And the quiche scene is quite funny too. Just bizarre.
  • HASEROTHASEROT has returned like the tedious inevitability of an unloved season---
    Posts: 4,399
    the only actor i wish could've gotten the role that didn't was John Gavin... he was all signed on ready to go for Diamonds Are Forever, then they struck the deal with Connery at the last minute - so they kicked him to the curb... Gavin was a terrific actor, and i think could've handled the role well.

    gavin_zpsc6f752e5.jpg
  • Getafix wrote: »
    All I mean is that there were other qualified actors around, so the reason they kept Rog was not that there weren't other people who could have played the role well (IMO).

    The fact that EON were speaking to Dalton in the early 80s shows that Rog staying in post was far from a foregone conclusion.

    I am huge fan of Rog and don't regret him having stayed on as long as he did at all. OP is one of my favourites. I guess I wouldn't have been too upset if we hadn't got AVTAK but one too many is better than one too few IMO. How much do I regret we didn't get a third Dalton...?!

    Agreed. As much as I loved Roger Moore I'd have happily sacrificed AVTAK in favor of a third Dalton film.

    But I would't have traded Octopussy or FYEO for anything.
  • Posts: 11,425
    Getafix wrote: »
    All I mean is that there were other qualified actors around, so the reason they kept Rog was not that there weren't other people who could have played the role well (IMO).

    The fact that EON were speaking to Dalton in the early 80s shows that Rog staying in post was far from a foregone conclusion.

    I am huge fan of Rog and don't regret him having stayed on as long as he did at all. OP is one of my favourites. I guess I wouldn't have been too upset if we hadn't got AVTAK but one too many is better than one too few IMO. How much do I regret we didn't get a third Dalton...?!

    Agreed. As much as I loved Roger Moore I'd have happily sacrificed AVTAK in favor of a third Dalton film.

    But I would't have traded Octopussy or FYEO for anything.

    Tim in FYEO would have been interesting, but OP is pure Rog - love it!
  • Getafix wrote: »
    Getafix wrote: »
    All I mean is that there were other qualified actors around, so the reason they kept Rog was not that there weren't other people who could have played the role well (IMO).

    The fact that EON were speaking to Dalton in the early 80s shows that Rog staying in post was far from a foregone conclusion.

    I am huge fan of Rog and don't regret him having stayed on as long as he did at all. OP is one of my favourites. I guess I wouldn't have been too upset if we hadn't got AVTAK but one too many is better than one too few IMO. How much do I regret we didn't get a third Dalton...?!

    Agreed. As much as I loved Roger Moore I'd have happily sacrificed AVTAK in favor of a third Dalton film.

    But I would't have traded Octopussy or FYEO for anything.

    Tim in FYEO would have been interesting, but OP is pure Rog - love it!

    True. But then we never would've gotten Octopussy. And FYEO works best as a follow-up to MR as it's so back-to-basics so switching the films around wouldn't have worked.

    I know this is off topic but out of curiosity what was your opinion on the proposed Bond 17 outline which would've starred Dalton and would've been released around 1991/1992? Seeing as how you're a huge Dalton fan I assume you know what I'm talking about.
  • Posts: 11,425
    Getafix wrote: »
    Getafix wrote: »
    All I mean is that there were other qualified actors around, so the reason they kept Rog was not that there weren't other people who could have played the role well (IMO).

    The fact that EON were speaking to Dalton in the early 80s shows that Rog staying in post was far from a foregone conclusion.

    I am huge fan of Rog and don't regret him having stayed on as long as he did at all. OP is one of my favourites. I guess I wouldn't have been too upset if we hadn't got AVTAK but one too many is better than one too few IMO. How much do I regret we didn't get a third Dalton...?!

    Agreed. As much as I loved Roger Moore I'd have happily sacrificed AVTAK in favor of a third Dalton film.

    But I would't have traded Octopussy or FYEO for anything.

    Tim in FYEO would have been interesting, but OP is pure Rog - love it!

    True. But then we never would've gotten Octopussy. And FYEO works best as a follow-up to MR as it's so back-to-basics so switching the films around wouldn't have worked.

    I know this is off topic but out of curiosity what was your opinion on the proposed Bond 17 outline which would've starred Dalton and would've been released around 1991/1992? Seeing as how you're a huge Dalton fan I assume you know what I'm talking about.

    I'm only aware of the most sketchy outlines of the plot. I asusme this is the one with Sir Henry Lee Cha Ching and the laser robots? The outline plot sounded pretty awful to be honest, although I liked the idea of using China. Wasn't there a chase along the Great Wall proposed? Could possibly have been good.

    I am not a fan of GE but I think the plot is probably slightly better and would have suited Dalton more.
  • TheWizardOfIceTheWizardOfIce 'One of the Internet's more toxic individuals'
    Posts: 9,117

    This thread has veered widely off topic but thank goodness they didn't replace Moore after FYEO. I love Octopussy and I can't quite imagine another Bond actor in that film. Sometimes it's simply okay to just be widely entertained by a Bond film. The gritty real world, personal issues, and everyday stresses and strains can wait - a rogue Russian general wants to detonate a nuclear bomb, Louis Jourdan is getting up to villainous things in impossibly romantic India, and 009 has been killed while clutching a Faberge egg - fortunately there is one man in a safari suit who can save us all. It's Rog time!

    Very well said Sir. The fate of the western world is in jeopardy. Who can save us whilst cracking a one liner and without getting a hair out of place? Shall I call James Brolin? Dont think so this is a job for Sir Rog!
Sign In or Register to comment.