It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Amen, if I may say so, to that.
They can't do that, it would be considered inhuman treatment. Because, you know, that is really awful and wrong. I joke, I joke, but some comments blaming the victims I read online are appalling.
And I am watching the news, it says the girlfriend of one of the gunmen may have fled the country and be in Syria. Depressing. Although now that she is free she can watch TV all she wants and see the caricatures of her beloved Mohammed everywhere.
~X(
I will show you some opinion articles/blog posts if you'd like. They don't say it in so many words, but that is pretty much what they imply. One even says that, while a crime, the murders were not terrorism and compares Hollande to Bush. Hollande to Bush. No joke.
So someone out shopping, thinking what they'll cook for tea, while
Keeping their little kid happy. Is somehow to blame for a deranged
Terrorist with a machine gun killing people.
Once again sad,sad people.
I heard somewhere that the 70 virgins or whatever it is, is possibly a mis-reading of the Koran and that it actually says '70 white raisins'. Imagine their faces...
http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2006/02/do_raisins_not.php
The guy was talking more about Charlie Hebdo's work than the bystanders. Still not an excuse.
Freedom of expression. This may annoy some politicians but even
They up hold the principle.
Sadly those who cannot defend their views with discourse and
Reasoned argument, always turn to the gun and the bomb. There
Reasoning is " if we can't persuade you, we'll kill you !"
I love Léa Seydoux.
Alienation and disenfranchisement are often cited among the reasons. Assuming that to be the case, how are alienation and disenfranchisement assuaged? With these three individuals, what could have been done and whose responsibility was it to fulfill their hopes and dreams and erase their dissatisfactions? Family, friends, society?
While mining the shock of their acts, the media makes them victims by detailing their lives of disappointment, alienation, and unrealized dreams by providing a context for their actions.
There is no context, no justification.
Pay their taxes and get on with life, to try and do better for their kids.
I do think it is a disgrace that the working people have had to take all
The cuts to try and dig us out of the hole the Bankers, got the whole
Western world in to. They have done more damage to us than a terrorist
Gunman. Yet no arrests of Bankers ?, no cuts to their Bonuses.
I have no answers but if politicians keep treating the poor of society like
Something they stepped in, all kinds of trouble is going to emerge.
Sorry Rant over.
news.yahoo.com/arson-attack-german-paper-ran-charlie-hebdo-cartoons-065348454.html
Edit: Also, CNN just reported that a Belgian newspaper received a bomb threat and was evacuated for also printing Charlie Hebdo cartoons.
With regards to Islamism. I think we should read more about Wahabbism, which is the sect within Islam that has been the most vociferous in inciting violence against non-Muslims and Muslims alike. Interestingly, it originates in Saudi Arabia (the country from where 15/19 hijackers on September 11 originated from, and which is single handledly responsible for supporting the petro-dollar in our fiat based currency system). That country and its leaders (The House of Saud) are the source of most of the problems we face, including inequality (by propping up an inflated dollar). However, no one focuses on it. Inconvenient I suppose.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wahhabism
Well I'm perfectly happy with leaders of Muslim countries to turn up to show their solidarity with the rest of the world that they agree people be allowed to mock Mohammed, Jesus, whoever.
Strangely I don't see many of them there - presume they didnt fancy having their heads hacked off by a rabid public when they returned to their countries.
Maybe they were worried about incitement in Paris to begin with given justifiable public anger & outrage. They may have had their heads hacked off right then and there. Isn't guillotine a French word.
Well until the 'peace loving majority' we keep being told so much about come out vociferously against the terrorists then is it any wonder people are suspicious of them? Muslims in Paris could easily have had a march today saying 'this is not being done in our name and we respect people's right to mock the prophet' if they so desired. The police would have protected them if they had fear of reprisals but I don't think there would have been.
You have a point there. I don't think Muslims believe that it is correct to mock the prophet. Then again, in all fairness, I don't think you can expect Catholics to have a march saying we respect people's right to mock the Pope. Perhaps a march saying we tolerate that right but not respect it. I don't think religious people of any persuasion could be expected to march for that.
I'm playing devil's (no pun intended) advocate here, but hopefully you get my point. At the end of the day, I'm not in favour of religion either, but I accept it for what it is, and the fact that it influences others.
Wahabbism is the problem IMO.
Actually, many Muslims were in Paris marching. Yes, the Muslim community in France has its share of fundies. But many are Westernized, some are even atheists and secularist, although Muslim by culture. The oppressive burden of Islamic faith is often first felt by the members of a community.