It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
If he gets it after Craig is gone, I'm reasonably sure he will deliver something quite different from what he would do with Craig. Having said that, I'm not sure if he will be such a front runner post-Craig.
I also don't understand why all the film sites are reporting he's "ruled it out" when he has yet to give a conclusive answer on the matter. At this point I'd be surprised if he ends up doing it, although it's still possible (Dune came to him first but likely won't get made until several years after B25).
I hope Villeneuve takes the bullet of Bond 25 so Nolan can come in and do what he wants with a reboot. I can't see why any director worth his salt would want Bond 25, it's a complete clusterfudge of continuity and Craig likely will be combative on set again.
Yes, I agree that a more breezy approach is what's likely post-Craig. I think Villeneueve could deliver that though. He's quite versatile. His earlier films were 'gritty' and the later ones (Arrival and BR2049) have been more 'fantasy'. I can see both Nolan and he (given their respective ages and favourites) giving us something more grand and light in comparison to what we've gotten lately, should either of them get it post-Craig.
Explain and support this?
As per what always happens. This is news to you?
Not even mentioning his delicate handling of the press (which goes without saying).
You can't teach an old dog new tricks, I'm afraid.
However, your assumptions about instances of production being delayed due to Craig's "stubbornness" seem like mere assumptions to me based on a certain bias. Regarding him "not gelling well" with directors, what exactly are you basing this on? The only case coming to mind is some alleged bickering taking place between Craig and Mendes during SP, which much like the wrist-slashing comments, has been blown out of proportion by the media (not to mention Craig saying he would gladly work with the man again "tomorrow."
I owe nothing to Craig. He's a fantastic Bond IMO, but I'm not about showing some kind of hyperbolic allegiance to him like many of Craig's nay-sayers suggest Craig fans to show (I'm not saying you're suggesting this, but I've seen many make this ridiculous claim). I see things objectively but to me it seems like you're cherry-picking here, mate.
As far as ppl who have worked with him, we had one reader on this forum who worked with EoN and several of his colleagues still do; plus he himself has worked with ppl who have worked with Craig— all reports is that he is a professional. Whatever you think of his Bond, he comes to work.
@Mendes4Lyfe is projecting again.
News to me as well.
He has always been odd with the press. But there is no evidence that he has ever been issue on set -- in fact, the evidence suggests just the opposite.
This.
That Chris Nolan will now be directing Aidan Turner?
That’s what @Mendes4Lyfe PM’d me at 4 am on New Year’s Day.
https://reddit.com/r/JamesBond/comments/6vti3w/new_bond_25_details_revealed_director_hired/
The Reddit stuff was indeed posted before. Some of it is believable, some of it sounds like complete fabrication.