It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I'm starting to think that negotiations with a potential distributor haven't even started yet.
All we know is that MGM CEO Gary Barber said he'd been in touch with all the studios. Who knows?
http://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/mar/23/james-bond-cinematic-universe-idris-elba-tom-hiddleston-tom-hardy
Roger Dean thanks you
Here we go again, I'm going to be the host of the live revelation of the new Bond distributor as soon as I getting the BBC contact to make the show.
You'll see :-)
Ok.
Every time I see your username a little bit of sick hits the back of my throat.
Count me in as well
Maybe because he didn t break any rules?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3586994/Tom-Hiddleston-spotted-meeting-director-Sam-Mendes-producer-Barbara-Broccoli-Soho-House-fuelling-speculation-s-set-play-007.html
It is reported in the Daily Mail though, so approach with caution...
My guess (and while this might annoy some fans keep in mind it's just a guess)
Bond 25: basically it wraps up all the loose ends in spectre Blofeld is killed as is Swann Bond is 007 again and all is right with the world. While I would like a non one word title I wouldn't be opposed to calling the film simply Blofeld.
Bond 26: first with Hiddleston and it's a fresh start maybe have Tom visit Swann's grave or Vespers grave to show its the same man but then move on.
@FoxRox My gut tells me we won't know for a while.
I heard Uruguay.
A sensible take on the situation.
I dunno.
My worries are that this is the case too. I was just thinking that they're going to disappoint some fans with the next Bond film. Opinion seems to be divided on whether they should carry on with Spectre, Blofeld and Swann or do something completely unrelated. Which ever way they go they'll disappoint those that want the other.
I very much agree, and personnaly I think the solution is to go smaller not bigger. So many films get sequels not because they make the big bucks, but because they are modestly budgeted so don't need big money to be a success. Of course, this allows everyone involved a lot more creative freedom, if a little less scope. Bond films are already about 20 minutes too long in my opinion, so cutting the fat out, tightening up those set pieces can only have a positive outcome. Then, B25 could make 600 million and still be a smash hit. Remember when Casino Royale made that much and was considered a huge hit? That would probably be a flop by todays sky high standards. I mean, SPECTRE made close to 900 million worldwide and that is being considered disappointing by some. What madness is that?