It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I don't see them totally abandoning Hodge's script, also Shatterhand as been out there for sometime now, a tabloid quoted it as a title.
As for Boyle being the one wanting to kill Bond off sounds far more credible to the other way round, maybe they initially said yes and then as time went on decided it wasn't a good idea.
I still think Boyle might have been in over his head and was looking for a get out as time went on, he's never been involved in this type of production and had already casted doubt on this with some early comments.
Possibly them nixing the idea was the last straw and this is why he walked. As long as they secure a director soon I'll look at his departure as bump in the road and possibly a blessing in disguise.
The difference is Production Weekly is not a tabloid. It's an industry publication for crewing up movies.
I was in support of the Boyle experiment (as it turned out), but if there ever were a right time to do a faithful YOLT, it is now, and with this Bond actor.
That's nearly what happened before they hired Boyle, so I assume so, if they get a move on. Sort of like going back to plan A.
That means Yann demange.
Yeah, uh, that's Internet garbage; Barbara Brocolli or Michael Wilson have never stated anything of the kind, although some here seem to think they have. I mean, it's "Babs is ruining everything" all the time.
Hey, calling her "Babs"... that's so hipster, you cute angry people, you. ;-)
That's probably hipster as well.
Also; another "S" title…?
I do as well. We'd probably have quite a few more Bond films to enjoy since LTK.
If SHATTERHAND is indeed the title I'll be more than thrilled.
S'up, Mr. Bond?
It could have been worse...
Swag 007
Regarding going back to P&W, perhaps it's too early to draw definite conclusions either way. The working title could be just that, in lieu of it being called something else. It doesn't mean that the final film will have that title.
Maybe the plot involves Blofeld's kid revenging his/her father? More family connections to enjoy!
I now love it
Glad to see someone paint Craig in a positive light! These last few pages have been dire to catch up on!
I'm all for Shatterhand to be a title as I've long wanted a more faithful adaptation of YOLT, not that that is an indicator of what we're getting. As far as I know, there was no Blue Harvest occurring in Return of The Jedi. I really don't know why the letter S upsets so many members on this board, either.
It's the three in a row that annoys me - and single word titles for the third time as well (if it is Shatterhand, that is)
Yeah, highly unlikely Imo.