It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
+3. Beyond idiotic, especially if it's there to tie off some actor's tenure.
Hear! Hear!
Hahaha! :))
We seem to forget that the Nolan discussion is related to Bond 26, not Bond 25. I think we can safely say Nolan won't do Bond 25, and that other candidates, like Demange etc., are more worthy a discussion in this thread(?)
What's very interesting is that the picture that's starting to emerge is that on one hand Boyle + Hodge had a "movie gold" idea that EON liked, and on the other hand EON had a shocking idea Boyle disliked. If they end up incorporating both of these ideas into BOND 25, we might end up with a pretty interesting movie.
Perhaps the announcement should have read "irreconcilable differences" rather than the more typical "creative differences" ;)
No,i would certainly welcome them back,i'm with you on that,PP.
What's very interesting is that the picture that's starting to emerge is that on one hand Boyle + Hodge had a "movie gold" idea that EON liked, and on the other hand EON had a shocking idea Boyle disliked. If they end up incorporating both of these ideas into BOND 25, we might end up with a pretty interesting movie.[/quote]
As long as it didn't involve the frankly preposterous idea of Bond dying.
We had no real idea of what Boyle was going to do or whether or not we would appreciate it, so who knows if it would be better for him to come back.
@matt_u : first of all, welcome to the site.
Everything you have written here is quite true. I am a bigger fan of SF than SP, and that film, too, has been raked over hot coals by members. Of course, everyone is free to hold their opinions of any Bond film. But the #1 complaint about SF is its implausible plot. That's always the biggest head scratcher for me.
Following his career decisions is like being at a bloody theme park.
I cant see that slowing B25 down,as its already scripted and ready to go after the festival bids.
But I thought he would be committed to Bond and not fart-arsing around on other projects.
If you want to be co-producer then you need to be fully focused on the film you are meant to be bloody producing.
I'm surprised he took this on frankly, especially now with B25 needing full focus.
Interesting times indeed.
Not to mention, a dad to a newborn.
Exactly,that as well !!
I was just having a bit of a laugh at the title of this film. For a threatened wrist slasher, I can just see folks having a bit of fun with it in the media.
I don't think his enthusiasm for the role is exactly peaking,do you ?
I can see him playing his last Bond on auto-pilot as he did in SP,meanwhile getting his final massive pay-check for his wife and kid.
FRWL and GF were released 11 months apart, and Connery managed to squeeze in both Woman Of Straw and Marnie in between.
I wonder what suddenly drew him to this now though? It's not like he's been especially prolific over the past 6 odd years. A detective as well. That's closer to Bond than other parts he could have gone for.
Indeed Bazza.