› › ›

No Time To Die: Production Diary

1…18381839184118431844…2507

Comments

  • LeChiffreLeChiffre
    Posts: 1,548
    I want Waltz back. Not bothered who scores it. I just want the story to be as Flemingesque as possible. Also a I want Tanner to be more involved. Rory Kinnear has had little to do to date.
  • fjdinardofjdinardo
    Posts: 1,970
    Is Arnolds return confirmed? Sorry please no. I want new composers. I want to hear new sound.
  • fjdinardofjdinardo
    Posts: 1,970
    This director he likes his gun barrels in the beginning right?
  • Risico007Risico007
    Posts: 9,846
    PanchitoPistoles wrote: »
    If Arnold returns, I'm out.

    Now we have two reasons for Arnold’s Return
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,208
    Risico007 wrote: »
    PanchitoPistoles wrote: »
    If Arnold returns, I'm out.

    Now we have two reasons for Arnold’s Return
    Ha! Now that’s funny.

  • ToTheRightToTheRight
    Posts: 16,163
    fjdinardo wrote: »
    This director he likes his gun barrels in the beginning right?

    I really hope so.
  • ringfire211ringfire211
    Posts: 654
    But no seriously folks... the title of the new film is GOLDFINGER 2.0. This just in!
  • Risico007Risico007
    Posts: 9,846
    ringfire211 wrote: »
    But no seriously folks... the title of the new film is GOLDFINGER 2.0. This just in!

    No bond 25 is Wave Link trust me I know
  • fjdinardofjdinardo
    Posts: 1,970
    ringfire211 wrote: »
    But no seriously folks... the title of the new film is GOLDFINGER 2.0. This just in!

    Goldfingers
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 4,630
    fjdinardo wrote: »
    ringfire211 wrote: »
    But no seriously folks... the title of the new film is GOLDFINGER 2.0. This just in!

    Goldfingers

    Wouldn't surprise me if they brought Goldfinger back to the movies at some point in my life.
  • barryt007barryt007
    edited October 2018 Posts: 19,339
    ringfire211 wrote: »
    It’s official. David Arnold will score Bond 25. Wooohooo!!!

    If only !!
    Risico007 wrote: »
    PanchitoPistoles wrote: »
    If Arnold returns, I'm out.

    Now we have two reasons for Arnold’s Return

    Ow....but that is funny haha !!
  • UnivexUnivex
    Posts: 6,709
    Boy oh boy, are we stuck in the same rut again. No news, no more elaboration to conjure about the director. Just void and enough patience to fill a peanut.
  • FrankXavierFrankXavier
    Posts: 678
    ringfire211 wrote: »
    But no seriously folks... the title of the new film is GOLDFINGER 2.0. This just in!
    Hey, if Star Wars can remake A New Hope, Bond can remake Goldfinger.
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 4,630
    FrankXavier wrote: »
    ringfire211 wrote: »
    But no seriously folks... the title of the new film is GOLDFINGER 2.0. This just in!
    Hey, if Star Wars can remake A New Hope, Bond can remake Goldfinger.

    They did, it's called A View To A Kill.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    FrankXavier wrote: »
    ringfire211 wrote: »
    But no seriously folks... the title of the new film is GOLDFINGER 2.0. This just in!
    Hey, if Star Wars can remake A New Hope, Bond can remake Goldfinger.
    They did, it's called A View To A Kill.
    Precisely.
  • fjdinardofjdinardo
    Posts: 1,970
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    FrankXavier wrote: »
    ringfire211 wrote: »
    But no seriously folks... the title of the new film is GOLDFINGER 2.0. This just in!
    Hey, if Star Wars can remake A New Hope, Bond can remake Goldfinger.

    They did, it's called A View To A Kill.

    The remake was better
  • ColonelSunColonelSun
    Posts: 1,490
    fjdinardo wrote: »
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    FrankXavier wrote: »
    ringfire211 wrote: »
    But no seriously folks... the title of the new film is GOLDFINGER 2.0. This just in!
    Hey, if Star Wars can remake A New Hope, Bond can remake Goldfinger.

    They did, it's called A View To A Kill.

    The remake was better

    AVTAK better than GF? Seriously?

  • Risico007Risico007
    edited October 2018 Posts: 9,846
    ColonelSun wrote: »
    fjdinardo wrote: »
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    FrankXavier wrote: »
    ringfire211 wrote: »
    But no seriously folks... the title of the new film is GOLDFINGER 2.0. This just in!
    Hey, if Star Wars can remake A New Hope, Bond can remake Goldfinger.

    They did, it's called A View To A Kill.

    The remake was better

    AVTAK better than GF? Seriously?

    I sadly agree

    Gold finger was always a film with iconic moments but no thru line
  • barryt007barryt007
    edited October 2018 Posts: 19,339
    fjdinardo wrote: »
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    FrankXavier wrote: »
    ringfire211 wrote: »
    But no seriously folks... the title of the new film is GOLDFINGER 2.0. This just in!
    Hey, if Star Wars can remake A New Hope, Bond can remake Goldfinger.

    They did, it's called A View To A Kill.

    The remake was better

    Agreed.

    I suppose Bond could go down the 'Fifty Shades of Grey' route and make the next one : Goldfingerer.
  • ColonelSunColonelSun
    Posts: 1,490
    Risico007 wrote: »
    ColonelSun wrote: »
    fjdinardo wrote: »
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    FrankXavier wrote: »
    ringfire211 wrote: »
    But no seriously folks... the title of the new film is GOLDFINGER 2.0. This just in!
    Hey, if Star Wars can remake A New Hope, Bond can remake Goldfinger.

    They did, it's called A View To A Kill.

    The remake was better

    AVTAK better than GF? Seriously?

    I sadly agree

    Gold finger was always a film with iconic moments but no thru line

    No through line? What does that mean? The plot is driven by a man obsessed with gold. Goldfinger is a terrific character, and the supporting characters around him are great too - very memorable. Pussy Galore is far more interesting than MayDay. OddJob is an iconic character to this day. Connery is on top form. The film oozes 60's class and style. AVTAK oozes 80's cheese. Moore is past his prime and looks and sounds tired. Walken is good as Zorin, but the writing doesn't do him justice. There is a reason why GF is always at the top of critics' and audiences' lists of the best Bond films. I don't think I have ever seen such a list with AVTAK in the top 3 or 5 films. In fact it nearly always appears near the bottom. It's a poor plot re-hash of a far, far superior film.
  • UnivexUnivex
    Posts: 6,709
    ColonelSun wrote: »
    Risico007 wrote: »
    ColonelSun wrote: »
    fjdinardo wrote: »
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    FrankXavier wrote: »
    ringfire211 wrote: »
    But no seriously folks... the title of the new film is GOLDFINGER 2.0. This just in!
    Hey, if Star Wars can remake A New Hope, Bond can remake Goldfinger.

    They did, it's called A View To A Kill.

    The remake was better

    AVTAK better than GF? Seriously?

    I sadly agree

    Gold finger was always a film with iconic moments but no thru line

    No through line? What does that mean? The plot is driven by a man obsessed with gold. Goldfinger is a terrific character, and the supporting characters around him are great too - very memorable. Pussy Galore is far more interesting than MayDay. OddJob is an iconic character to this day. Connery is on top form. The film oozes 60's class and style. AVTAK oozes 80's cheese. Moore is past his prime and looks and sounds tired. Walken is good as Zorin, but the writing doesn't do him justice. There is a reason why GF is always at the top of critics' and audiences' lists of the best Bond films. I don't think I have ever seen such a list with AVTAK in the top 3 or 5 films. In fact it nearly always appears near the bottom. It's a poor plot re-hash of a far, far superior film.

    I used to think this was one of the few agreements in the fan community. But I guess the times are changing. Never though I'd hear someone prefer AVTAK to GF. Now, if we're talking about the books, GF is no good, no good at all. One of Fleming's weakest. That they've been able to turn that book into that film is one of nature's miracles IMO.
  • ColonelSunColonelSun
    Posts: 1,490
    Univex wrote: »
    ColonelSun wrote: »
    Risico007 wrote: »
    ColonelSun wrote: »
    fjdinardo wrote: »
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    FrankXavier wrote: »
    ringfire211 wrote: »
    But no seriously folks... the title of the new film is GOLDFINGER 2.0. This just in!
    Hey, if Star Wars can remake A New Hope, Bond can remake Goldfinger.

    They did, it's called A View To A Kill.

    The remake was better

    AVTAK better than GF? Seriously?

    I sadly agree

    Gold finger was always a film with iconic moments but no thru line

    No through line? What does that mean? The plot is driven by a man obsessed with gold. Goldfinger is a terrific character, and the supporting characters around him are great too - very memorable. Pussy Galore is far more interesting than MayDay. OddJob is an iconic character to this day. Connery is on top form. The film oozes 60's class and style. AVTAK oozes 80's cheese. Moore is past his prime and looks and sounds tired. Walken is good as Zorin, but the writing doesn't do him justice. There is a reason why GF is always at the top of critics' and audiences' lists of the best Bond films. I don't think I have ever seen such a list with AVTAK in the top 3 or 5 films. In fact it nearly always appears near the bottom. It's a poor plot re-hash of a far, far superior film.

    I used to think this was one of the few agreements in the fan community. But I guess the times are changing. Never though I'd hear someone prefer AVTAK to GF. Now, if we're talking about the books, GF is no good, no good at all. One of Fleming's weakest. That they've been able to turn that book into that film is one of nature's miracles IMO.

    Agree re; Fleming's novel. Eon took the strong central premise and characters and worked them into very sharp and witty script.

    Re; the argument, can anyone really claim Connery '64 is bettered by Moore '85?
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    ColonelSun wrote: »
    Re; the argument, can anyone really claim Connery '64 is bettered by Moore '85?
    I personally don't. But, stranger things have happened around here.
  • barryt007barryt007
    Posts: 19,339
    I'm not saying which Bond I prefer,obviously it's Connery '64,all I am saying is I prefer AVTAK as an entertaining film,compared to GF,where,apart from the brilliant PTS and golf scene,Bond doesn't do a lot...IMO.
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,591
    What does this have to do with Bond 25?
  • ColonelSunColonelSun
    Posts: 1,490
    jake24 wrote: »
    What does this have to do with Bond 25?

    AVTAK was Moore's final Bond - and, it seems, Bond 25 will be Craig's swan song, perhaps that's why it's come up?

  • Risico007Risico007
    Posts: 9,846
    Look opinions are opinions but if I had to choose between the two I would choose A view to a kill

    My issues with gold finger are as follows

    1. While there are iconic moment there are also boring moments like watching Goldfinger sleep while Odd job drives him around
    2. Bond does next to nothing in the second half of the film
    3. The cia is completely adept in the film (especially annoying since just two years previous we got one of he coolest Leiters on film)

    Again I love all Bond films but sorry Goldfinger is just not one of my faves it’s not as bad as Moonraker or Diamonds are forever but it’s not the masterpiece of Casino Royale or From Russia with Love
  • ColonelSunColonelSun
    Posts: 1,490
    AVTAK is, for me, one of the most tired and cheesy Bond films ever made, (the fact it had to steal /re-work the GF premise says it all) but I still enjoy it for what it is -- it just isn't in the same filmmaking league as GF in terms of script, casting, direction, acting, music and design etc. And that's why it is widely considered one of the best Bond films, if not the best Bond, by nearly every poll ever taken. That does not mean you can't enjoy AVTAK more than GF, that's just personal taste.

    Now, back to Bond 25, perhaps?
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,591
    That would be swell.
  • UnivexUnivex
    Posts: 6,709
    Yes, but back to what? :) Now that is the question.

    What do you guys think it's happening behind the curtain right now? Fukunaga's writing alongside P&W? New sets are being build? What?
Sign In or Register to comment.