It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Nice. I figure a lot is going on behind the scenes at the moment, and I don’t think there’s reason to panic yet.
Something is deeply wrong on B25. CF’s interview from a week or two ago was a ruse, I tell ya! A ruse! His delightful commentary must’ve been to throw everyone off the scent that everything, and I mean EVERYTHING is lost on B25!
Come to think of it Panchito, if things were off the rails on this production, I think that would have been leaked some time ago.
CF is finishing the script.
Cant leak something if there's nothing to leak. Honestly, I'd rather have nothing. Then its more nonsense discussions about having Angelina Jolie being a villian. Casino Royale was the best Bond cinematic experience for me and possibly the best ever because I knew nothing about it prior.
Why is that necessary? The Sony leaks put a damper on SP production. If there is any casting/location speculation that is being discussed, one can almost think that jobs/roles are on the line to keep their mouths shut.
I find your posts humorous to the point of being annoying, at times. I, and a few others, were trying to give you some perspective. In other words, we were trying to talk you off of the figurative ledge. That’s all.
Listen, in the end, if you think it’s all suspicious— then have at it. I support you and your hunches.
Concern about no news seems just bizarre to me at this point in production. But, each to their own. News will come eventually anyway.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJOm2mRHDE0
Which is just around the corner!
Did I touch a nerve there, poor lad? At least I don't go nitpicking into the most unimportant microscopic details into something and provide the thread with hideous, horrendous and nonsensical discourse.
https://www.onceuponachef.com/recipes/potato-leek-soup.html
It’s certainly not outside the realm of possibility. In addition to promoting Bond through his concerts, Arnold has co-produced expanded editions of his scores for DAD and TWINE over the past year. He obviously has an active relationship with the Bond team as well as the passion for it. Here’s hoping.
Daniel Craig as James Bond
Ralph fienes as M
Naomi Harris as moneypenny
And here is a rumor for ya
Christophe Waltz will be Blofield
If someone's posts continuously annoy you, just ignore them. If you react, you will create a debate which will go on forever. If you ignore them, they will become lone comments, posted every now and then.
You're welcome.
I don't doubt the Bond girl and/or Bond villain will be reported sometime down the line. We just have to wait.
I'm as excited as everybody else to hear something from B&W, but I'm also patient. The interesting, less vague and less speculatory bits usually drop down much later in the game. The first bones they throw at us have an ugly tendency of drawing a lot of blood from the most optimistic and pessimistic fans both. Remember when Casino Royale was not going to have "any explosions or gun firing", which led many on this forum to conclude that the Craig era was going to be about as boring as Craig was blonde? Remember when Naomi Harris was going to be "Eve" but not Moneypenny and Christophe Waltz was going to be Oberhausen but not Blofeld? Especially with the latter, several members of this forum were absolutely convinced that Spectre and Blofeld were firmly locked away in the past, that modern Bond films would never dare to invite those relics back in, and they were willing to give up posting here altogether because not everyone was willing to believe them.
More than a handful of threads are immediately infested with civil wars based on small pebbles of news that can usually be read anyway we like. Those wars are fought by three factions: those who are absolutely sure that x will by y, those who are absolutely sure that x will be anything but y, and those who insist that patience is a virtue and all the clairvoyant bickering is just stupid. When the truth finally reaches us, all the fuss is proven to have been for naught and serious talking can begin. I'm going to relax for now and await that stage of the game. More than anything, I'm not going read an information vacuum as an immediate cause for stress. Good things come to those who wait.