› › ›

No Time To Die: Production Diary

1…19001901190319051906…2507

Comments

  • Blofeld0064Blofeld0064 Milford, Michigan
    Posts: 243
    Surprisingly no Christoph Waltz mentioned which will not break my heart at all if he doesn't return! I actually would like to see a female main villain this time.
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,231
    I'm caught between being excited at these developments - as it proves that things have been tipping along nicely - and being both extremely unsurprised at and wary of Swann's return.

    I'm sure they have an ace up their sleeve regards the reason for her return.
  • DoctorNoDoctorNo USA-Maryland
    Posts: 755
    No to Brofeld. Not surprised at all that the MI6 gang is back. Just pray like most they’re in it briefly. Love Lea Seydoux but it doesn’t state she’s the main Bond girl so who knows... personally I’m hoping it’s a change of scene/pace, like seeing Seydoux in a bikini on a tropical island... she can still be smart, just sex her the hell up (it will take little effort)... no one should be complaining.
  • DonnyDB5DonnyDB5 Buffalo, New York
    Posts: 1,755
    The last thing I’m gonna do is complain about any cast members returning. I’m so stoked things are finally shaping up.
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    talos7 wrote: »
    BondAficionado wrote: »
    SP might retrospectively end up being an above par Bond film if they're able to intelligently finish off the story. Like a reverse CR/QoS situation. Great news!

    Bond 25 may redeem the actors, and their characters, but it won’t make SP a better film.

    Agreed. I trust CF to deliver. If Mendes was returning to direct tgen I'd have no interest in this film what so ever.
  • 001001
    Posts: 1,575
    Daniel craig looks tired.
    How can he get back up and fit mentally and physically to play james bond.?
    Does he looks past it now ? Yes or no ?
    Should he have quit ? Yes or no ?
    Is he just doing b25 for the money ? Yes or no ?

    sei_36096774-9564.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&zoom=1&resize=644%2C754
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    edited December 2018 Posts: 8,231
    DoctorNo wrote: »
    No to Brofeld. Not surprised at all that the MI6 gang is back. Just pray like most they’re in it briefly. Love Lea Seydoux but it doesn’t state she’s the main Bond girl so who knows... personally I’m hoping it’s a change of scene/pace, like seeing Seydoux in a bikini on a tropical island... she can still be smart, just sex her the hell up (it will take little effort)... no one should be complaining.

    True. She could be back in any capacity. Even if it's not a standalone story, seeing what Fukanaga does with dangling SPECTRE plot threads will still be something to look forward to, even if it's as much down to curiosity than excitement.
    001 wrote: »
    Daniel craig looks tired.
    How can he get back up and fit mentally and physically to play james bond.?
    Does he looks past it now ? Yes or no ?
    Should he have quit ? Yes or no ?
    Is he just doing b25 for the money ? Yes or no ?

    sei_36096774-9564.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&zoom=1&resize=644%2C754

    Please don't start this nonsense again. Just go back a half dozen pages and see how we all feel about this particular issue.

    Craig is an actor, which requires him to play different characters who all require different looks. When the time comes for him to be James Bond, then he will be James Bond.
  • BMW_with_missilesBMW_with_missiles All the usual refinements.
    Posts: 3,000
    Birdleson wrote: »
    Last_Rat_Standing wrote: »
    Torgeirtrap wrote: »
    peter wrote: »
    Torgeirtrap wrote: »
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    Take with a grain of salt.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-6469437/amp/Lea-Seydoux-star-James-Bond-director-Daniel-Craig-asked-come-back.html

    Great with rumours, but don't know if this is one rumour I'd like to come true. Don't mind Lea Seydoux, but the chemistry with Craig wasn't there at all, IMO.

    Re-editing my post above, this rings entirely true. This was a very specific leak. I'd bet my house she's in 25 (for how long, who knows?); maybe she and Craig, with a new director, will have some connection? Some spark?

    If Seydoux returns, then I wonder how much part of the story the character of Madeleine Swann will have – and being the the daughter of Mr. White, if Spectre will too. My first reaction was that this might end up as some sort of revenge driven plot…

    I wonder if she gets killed off early then it sets the events of the YOLT novel into order

    Maybe they can kill her off Pre-Pre-Titles.

    She can be the one Bond shoots at in the gun barrel. Offscreen and unseen.
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,358
    001 wrote: »
    sei_36096774-9564.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&zoom=1&resize=644%2C754

    Death Wish VI: Bond 25. :D
  • 001001
    Posts: 1,575
    CraigMooreOHMSS wrote: »
    DoctorNo wrote: »
    No to Brofeld. Not surprised at all that the MI6 gang is back. Just pray like most they’re in it briefly. Love Lea Seydoux but it doesn’t state she’s the main Bond girl so who knows... personally I’m hoping it’s a change of scene/pace, like seeing Seydoux in a bikini on a tropical island... she can still be smart, just sex her the hell up (it will take little effort)... no one should be complaining.

    True. She could be back in any capacity. Even if it's not a standalone story, seeing what Fukanaga does with dangling SPECTRE plot threads will still be something to look forward to, even if it's as much down to curiosity than excitement.
    001 wrote: »
    Daniel craig looks tired.
    How can he get back up and fit mentally and physically to play james bond.?
    Does he looks past it now ? Yes or no ?
    Should he have quit ? Yes or no ?
    Is he just doing b25 for the money ? Yes or no ?

    sei_36096774-9564.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&zoom=1&resize=644%2C754

    Please don't start this nonsense again. Just go back a half dozen pages and see how we all feel about this particular issue.

    Craig is an actor, which requires him to play different characters who all require different looks. When the time comes for him to be James Bond, then he will be James Bond.

    He wasn't much of a James bond in spectre acting wise. He looked bored at times.
    Everyone knows he doesn't care for making bond films anymore.
    He's 50 and has to work out for 4 months to get his physique back which is damn hard work mentally and physically.
    Do you think it's an easy thing to do. You go do it when you're 50.
    Don't know how he does it.........
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    As if Madeleine Swann was a very interesting character, we get to see more of her. Yawn.
  • RemingtonRemington I'll do anything for a woman with a knife.
    Posts: 1,534
    ClarkDevlin wrote: »
    As if Madeleine Swann was a very interesting character, we get to see more of her. Yawn.

    Hell I'd rather see Christmas or Jinx return.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,511
    001 wrote: »
    Daniel craig looks tired.
    How can he get back up and fit mentally and physically to play james bond.?
    Does he looks past it now ? Yes or no ?
    Should he have quit ? Yes or no ?
    Is he just doing b25 for the money ? Yes or no ?

    sei_36096774-9564.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&zoom=1&resize=644%2C754

    Love this pic. Really, I do. And it's quite old (and perhaps, possibly, is a part of something to do with KNIVES OUT); HOWEVER, there are more recent pics of DC online. Surely you can choose from them?

    Remember that recent Omega ad? That really recent one-- that is how DC will look (or better), for 25.

    If you're a Bond fan, especially in the modern era, why would you think that the leading actor would come to set looking like the above pic? Why?

    Makes no sense.

    But makes perfect sense if hes playing a different role outside of 007 (heaven forbid).
  • FoxRoxFoxRox
    Posts: 12,518
    Happy to get some big news anyway. It will at least put to rest the rumor of the returning MI6 gang, who will hopefully be used better in B25 than SP. I like all the actors, but SP didn’t use them the best. Wouldn’t be surprised to see Madeleine killed early either.
  • RichardTheBruceRichardTheBruce I'm motivated by my Duty.
    Posts: 13,909
    These latest developments. Good.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,249
    I stil would not rule out Waltz; as with the others, given the right material and direction, he can be incredible effective.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Remington wrote: »
    ClarkDevlin wrote: »
    As if Madeleine Swann was a very interesting character, we get to see more of her. Yawn.
    Hell I'd rather see Christmas or Jinx return.
    I’ll take those two over Swann any day of the week.
  • UnivexUnivex
    Posts: 6,710
    ClarkDevlin wrote: »
    Remington wrote: »
    ClarkDevlin wrote: »
    As if Madeleine Swann was a very interesting character, we get to see more of her. Yawn.
    Hell I'd rather see Christmas or Jinx return.
    I’ll take those two over Swann any day of the week.

    Wow, I sure wouldn't. Not those two. Never again.
  • Some_Kind_Of_HeroSome_Kind_Of_Hero
    Posts: 6,844
    As with others, I suppose there is the possibility B25 could retroactively redeem Spectre. I mean, to an extent. And Fleming's YOLT is looking more and more possible. As for Waltz, in the event he does return, he said himself he wasn't happy with his performance in Spectre. For Craig's big send-off and with CJK onboard, I don't think they're going to give us a straight rehash of Spectre either. I don't know just what we're in for, but Waltz and Seydoux are good actors (as are Fiennes, Harris, and Wishaw) and with everybody giving it their best, they could still make this work.
  • ToTheRightToTheRight
    Posts: 16,221
    They might as well just call it SPECTRE and have Fukanaga do B25 as a shot for shot remake.

    I was really hoping the new film would distance itself from the story arc B.S. and just get back to a traditional Bond film. For one thing, SP didn't exactly resonate with audiences or fans, and it's way too late now to continue that story. That should have been done in 2017. Audiences won't care now. The world has moved on from SP.

    I think B25 will end up being the last Bond film for quite a long time. Not just like a 5 year gap, but more like 20. a'la INDY 4.
  • RemingtonRemington I'll do anything for a woman with a knife.
    edited December 2018 Posts: 1,534
    ClarkDevlin wrote: »
    As if Madeleine Swann was a very interesting character, we get to see more of her. Yawn.

    Hell I'd rather see Christmas or Jinx return.
    Univex wrote: »
    ClarkDevlin wrote: »
    Remington wrote: »
    ClarkDevlin wrote: »
    As if Madeleine Swann was a very interesting character, we get to see more of her. Yawn.
    Hell I'd rather see Christmas or Jinx return.
    I’ll take those two over Swann any day of the week.

    Wow, I sure wouldn't. Not those two. Never again.

    At least they were hilariously bad. Madeleine was just plain boring.
  • UnivexUnivex
    Posts: 6,710
    Remington wrote: »
    At least they were hilariously bad.

    That's a thing? Not in my book. They were cringeworthy, to say the least. Made me embarrassed to be a Bond fan. Really.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Better have a bad Bond Girl around than something that tries to be a masterpiece then falls flat on her face you could hear the thump on the floor from the other side of the earth. Madeleine Swann is the latter.
  • UnivexUnivex
    Posts: 6,710
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    I think B25 will end up being the last Bond film for quite a long time. Not just like a 5 year gap, but more like 20. a'la INDY 4.

    Oh, cmon!
  • RemingtonRemington I'll do anything for a woman with a knife.
    Posts: 1,534
    ClarkDevlin wrote: »
    Better have a bad Bond Girl around than something that tries to be a masterpiece then falls flat on her face you could hear the thump on the floor from the other side of the earth. Madeleine Swann is the latter.

    Can't argue with any of this.
  • Last_Rat_StandingLast_Rat_Standing Long Neck Ice Cold Beer Never Broke My Heart
    Posts: 4,600
    Spectre was Mendes's fault who had no clue/reason to do another after Skyfall. I firmly believe everything (even with these same characters) that it will be better. Hopefully no delays, no rewrites and issues.
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,231
    Some_Kind_Of_Hero wrote: »
    As with others, I suppose there is the possibility B25 could retroactively redeem Spectre. I mean, to an extent. And Fleming's YOLT is looking more and more possible. As for Waltz, in the event he does return, he said himself he wasn't happy with his performance in Spectre. For Craig's big send-off and with CJK onboard, I don't think they're going to give us a straight rehash of Spectre either. I don't know just what we're in for, but Waltz and Seydoux are good actors (as are Fiennes, Harris, and Wishaw) and with everybody giving it their best, they could still make this work.

    I think this is a good view. I think, considering what we know and who we have in the directors chair, that Spectre will be used as a springboard for Bond 25 as opposed to a template. This obviously won't do much to quell the doubts of those who really disliked SP, of course - but I think Bond 25 will certainly be interesting and unique.
  • ShakenNotStirredShakenNotStirred
    Posts: 1,399
    I guess it will be a direct sequel, then. Eh, after 5 years will the general public even remember Madeleine Swann?
  • Last_Rat_StandingLast_Rat_Standing Long Neck Ice Cold Beer Never Broke My Heart
    Posts: 4,600
    CraigMooreOHMSS wrote: »
    Some_Kind_Of_Hero wrote: »
    As with others, I suppose there is the possibility B25 could retroactively redeem Spectre. I mean, to an extent. And Fleming's YOLT is looking more and more possible. As for Waltz, in the event he does return, he said himself he wasn't happy with his performance in Spectre. For Craig's big send-off and with CJK onboard, I don't think they're going to give us a straight rehash of Spectre either. I don't know just what we're in for, but Waltz and Seydoux are good actors (as are Fiennes, Harris, and Wishaw) and with everybody giving it their best, they could still make this work.

    I think this is a good view. I think, considering what we know and who we have in the directors chair, that Spectre will be used as a springboard for Bond 25 as opposed to a template. This obviously won't do much to quell the doubts of those who really disliked SP, of course - but I think Bond 25 will certainly be interesting and unique.

    Agreed
  • FoxRoxFoxRox
    Posts: 12,518
    Some_Kind_Of_Hero wrote: »
    As with others, I suppose there is the possibility B25 could retroactively redeem Spectre. I mean, to an extent. And Fleming's YOLT is looking more and more possible. As for Waltz, in the event he does return, he said himself he wasn't happy with his performance in Spectre. For Craig's big send-off and with CJK onboard, I don't think they're going to give us a straight rehash of Spectre either. I don't know just what we're in for, but Waltz and Seydoux are good actors (as are Fiennes, Harris, and Wishaw) and with everybody giving it their best, they could still make this work.

    This. As someone who feels SP is one of the weakest Bond films, I’m still going to stay excited for B25. They can make this very good still. We can get back to the traditional standalone pattern again post-Craig.
Sign In or Register to comment.