It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Yeah the Craig era will be self contained and they won't want to introduce a new Blofeld and SPECTRE straight away (could confuse the audience plus it was just done). I don't think we'll see SPECTRE again for at least another couple of films. Which to me is fine. I loved SP so I don't see it as a waste, and I like the idea of Blofeld and co being a special attraction that they use every now and again more than I do them being wheeled out every film. Last time I watched them all I got quite bored of Blofeld and Spectre during the Connery/Lazenby era and was surprised when I realised that Kananga was only the second non Spectre/Blofeld antagonist, with the first one being Goldfinger nearly ten years before.
The Craig being axed rumours are interesting if only because he always seemed on really good terms with the producers. Definitely more than Brosnan was. I think more likely is that he quit himself, but it'll be interesting to read the full story when it inevitably all comes out. I can see how him sticking his oar in creatively would be a pain (isn't this one of the reasons Edward Norton is called difficult to work with) but to be fair it's always been said that he has more influence behind the scenes than any other actors. I assumed they were on board with that, having someone more dedicated to quality control. Maybe he asked for too much control this time? I dunno, I'm not buying this one.
Something just went off in my mind at that point.
Yesterday, a Facebook post with an unnamed source confirmed he's in talks. Today, a Facebook post with an unnamed source confirmed he's in talks. Tomorrow, I shall make a Facebook post and link you all, where I confirm that I'm the next James Bond.
You heard it here first, folks. Timothy Dalton will return as James Bond in 2018. From what my sources are telling me, it's a three picture deal with a studio option for a fourth. ;)
Yeah it just seemed to be DC and Sam Mendes doing interviews together. Could be something in this, or maybe just reading too much into it.
I thought tomorrow you were going to buy six dozen red roses for Pola.
My mistake
;) ;)
Taking solace in the arms of Gideon?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/tom-hiddleston-boxers-w-magazine_us_5767ea8de4b0fbbc8beadb4e
How do you know for sure?
Trust me. It's BS. I cannot disclose sources, for obvious reasons, but it was discussed on a job I was on at the weekend.
He's wrong this time I'm afraid to say.
I wouldn't be surprised if half the people on here have never heard of him to be honest.
Certainly the likes of @Mendes wouldn't have a clue while they are cheering that some local rag in Winnipeg has just run a story saying Turner has been spotted in Savile Row getting measured for suits.
Personally I'm torn. I can't imagine Graham Rye running with this unless he was sure but I also can't imagine someone at EON letting it slip.
Does anyone know what Graham's relationship is with them these days? I know back in the pre internet days it was good with him getting access to premiere tickets and such (TND in my tux inches away as Pierce walked past. Cheers Graham!) but I think the rise of sites like this must have hit him quite hard so it's good that he has kept it going.
I doubt Graham would want to jeopardise any relationship with EON by leaking the story (which would certainly annoy them) even if his source was rock solid so it's all a bit strange.