It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I'm not. SPECTRE brings closure to his era, let's move on
+ 1 more.
However, if Dan were to leave there's no telling how much I would like the next guy. Be careful what you wish for!
Besides, I believe the franchise is better off in the long run with the least amount of actors to have played Bond. It's an elite club as it stands now. When we start switching Bonds too often then perhaps the mystique starts to wear off a bit.
It is exciting to think that Dan could go on a long run to possibly match Roger. Until I think of Mendes and "Brofeld" returning.
I'm split and see the pros and cons of both sides. An football (American) coach once said,' it's better to have a player leave a little too soon than a little too late. I don't know if that applies here but it's food for thought.
For me if Craig returning means Mendes and Newman then I'd rather not see him return. If it's a new team around him then maybe so, depending on the team. If they put the Casino Royale band back together, Craig+ Campbell+ Arnold in order to bookend his era, then I'm all for his return.
I doubt that will happen.
He's done. His directors / writers have squeezed all they can from his interpretation.
The only way he can go is a bored 'middle finger' to everyone like Connery delivered for DAF and Pierce for DAD.
As things stand, Craig has a mixed bag of product. You don't wanna be remembered for a bad run. Just ask PB.
We'll get two films in that timeframe.
Or a spectacular one that will never be equaled in 2052 for the 90th anniversary.
I don't need or want Mendes, but he needs to deliver a film under 2:10. Contractually.
There is still no distributor for Bond 25
https://www.mi6-hq.com/sections/articles/bond-25-china-eyes-mgm-purchase?id=04229
It was during the conference call almost a year ago (fourth-quarter and full-year 2015 results) that Barber said Bond movies would come out on a 3- to 4-year cycle and that he was in "no hurry" to negotiate a Bond 25 distribution deal.
I feel the same, except about Turner instead of Hiddleston.
He just said he hasn't been approached for it.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-4270984/Tom-Hiddleston-hasn-t-approached-James-Bond.html
Now he's playing the game right. even if he has been, say nothing!
So don't expect much in the way of news in March - you're not going to get any.