It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
This answer your question if this reliable here is the evening standard http://www.standard.co.uk/showbiz/celebrity-news/daniel-craig-set-for-one-more-james-bond-film-as-producers-finally-persuade-him-to-return-a3506481.html
Having said that, they are the most likely choice, given they're well known to the producers. If EON needs to get a script together in short order, these two are likely the right persons for the job, as I can imagine that everyone wants to avoid the tangents that got them into a mess last time.
Evening Standard, like the other UK papers, is rewriting the New York Post.
The difficulty is, they can't retrofit an existing script to accommodate a new actor like they could in the past. A fifth Craig film would look nothing like the first in a fresh continuity. It's difficult to see how they could be writing a script at the moment.
I've pondered the same thing for a while now; figured if they truly are writing a script at this point, then they have to be pretty damn sure of Craig's return (or departure).
Same Eon that denied John Logan had been hired (when he had)?
Sam Eon that denied Ben Whishaw was playing Q (when he was)?
I can appreciate being skeptical of media reports. But given Eon's own track record, that skepticism should perhaps be extended to the producers as well.
That's true. I should have said positive confirmation (as opposed to denial of media rumours) from EON is all I'll believe at this point. The rest is conjecture, which could be accurate, or then again might be fake news.
Just a thought, but generally you can be more certain of departing than you are of returning. Because if you plan on returning, there is still unforeseen circumstance which can get in the way. Whereas departing is (usually) definitive. Like I say, just a thought.
We needn't get that crazy, but awaiting official confirmations doesn't hurt, either.
Well in that case lets call Professor Joe and have a telethon.
I liked that comment that Pierce Brosnan made in terms of Daniel having it in him to go well in to his fifties but obviously there will come a time when enough is enough.
Oh, I'm well aware. I'm taking it all in with extreme suspicion, but I'm still hoping.
It'll happen, just not when the journalistic nuts above proclaim it.
I certainly don't envy Barbara whenever another Bond must be cast. The selection sample is disastrously meek. Too many boys, far too few men.
I respect that Baz has to get clicks, but I agree. I miss the days in journalism, even in entertainment journalism, where writers just reported what was going on in clear, undramatic ways. The advent of Twitter has unfortunately made us suffer through all these writers teasing a bunch of bullshit rumors for attention.
With Baz all you hear is, "It's not happening...YET (cackling in background)," or "Stay tuned, I've got some BIG NEWS!" We get it Baz, you're a super important person. But please, don't speak until you've got something to say.