› › ›

No Time To Die: Production Diary

1…729730732734735…2507

Comments

  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    barryt007 wrote: »
    It's the best of all the Bond send-offs to me compared to a Connery camp cruise ship,Lazenby's that wasnt designed to be a send-off,Moore being a dirty old sod,Daltons' winking fish,and Brosnans diamonds with a yankee Jinx...

    Yes, its a respectable ending. Not embarrassing like some of the others.

    I find it embarrassing. It uses the Bond theme without having earned it, if that makes sense. Granted, the others are seven shades of... but it makes me cringe.
  • fjdinardofjdinardo
    Posts: 1,970
    If Craig does comeback I'm pretty sure it's gonna continue the blofeld story. They left him alive for a reason
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,392
    I'm just not sure what is to be gained from spending another 3 years and 200 million dollars to repair the damage. As they go along, the tenures of Bond get tired - it's a fact. I don't see where all this creative energy is going to come from all of a sudden. If they are truly going to meddle with things and present us with something different, it makes now a natural juncture to start thinking about a new actor. We'll have to wait and see what EON themselves think of all this. No doubt they have something in the pipeline by now.
  • barryt007barryt007
    edited May 2017 Posts: 19,339
    I actually think the 'story-arc' has damaged Dan's tenure as Bond now...if he just did stand-alone or ,like Connery,involved SPECTRE but in individual missions then he could easily have hit Moore's 7 films.

    It's come back to bite them,they took it too far..it should have stopped with CR-QOS....SF is fine as i see it as stand-alone,and i think it was made that way originally.

    SP has really taken the 'arc' too far,and people are now getting bored...Bond is NOT a soap-opera,he is a British agent who gives us something positive on the screen in the bad world we really live in.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited May 2017 Posts: 23,883
    I'm totally with you. That's why I believe Craig is done. He's a smart enough guy to know when it's time to move on, even if his fanbase won't take it well.

    If he chooses to come back, it will be for something worthwhile, but the writing's on the wall (as Smith's cracker noted).
  • barryt007barryt007
    Posts: 19,339
    Agreed..this is also on the 'In Search of James Bond' thread....so we dont re-rail this one...again.
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    I'm just not sure what is to be gained from spending another 3 years and 200 million dollars to repair the damage.

    I get where you're coming from, but the 'damage' your talking about is magnified on here. The general public don't give a ****. If a Craig film is released it's still a draw. We fawn over the minutiae in a way the general public simply don't. They don't care about Blofeld in the way we do and they won't notice if Swann is a footnote. The ability to end an actors tenure with aplomb has never been so possible.
  • Gustav_GravesGustav_Graves
    Posts: 11,119
    Gustav_Graves wrote: »
    This is a late April Fool's joke no?

    Guys? Bullocks? Yes or no please.

    If it is true, then I'm convinced Daniel Craig will stay. He would love to work together with the Nolan bros.
  • GetafixGetafix
    Posts: 11,425
    Nolan deserves a crack as much as anyone. I'd be happy to see him have a shot at it.

    At the very least the films would look amazing.
  • Risico007Risico007
    Posts: 9,843
    Nolan is not involved can we stop
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    Getafix wrote: »
    Nolan deserves a crack as much as anyone. I'd be happy to see him have a shot at it.

    At the very least the films would look amazing.
    True. The distance shot from the sky of Manhattan ablaze in TDKR as an example is stunning, and so real compared to the fake looking rubbish in most of the other blockbusters these days.
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    Getafix wrote: »
    Nolan deserves a crack as much as anyone. I'd be happy to see him have a shot at it.

    At the very least the films would look amazing.

    They would, although in all honesty I don't think he's made a film with cinematography to match Deakins' SF.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    Has Wally Pfister retired? Great cinematographer imho.
  • AlexanderWaverlyAlexanderWaverly
    Posts: 2,115
    bondjames wrote: »
    Has Wally Pfister retired? Great cinematographer imho.

    Not retired but moved on to be a director.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    AlexanderWaverly wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    Has Wally Pfister retired? Great cinematographer imho.

    Not retired but moved on to be a director.
    Ok, thanks. That explains it. I wondered why Nolan was using Hoyte these days.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,392
    RC7 wrote: »
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    I'm just not sure what is to be gained from spending another 3 years and 200 million dollars to repair the damage.

    I get where you're coming from, but the 'damage' your talking about is magnified on here. The general public don't give a ****. If a Craig film is released it's still a draw. We fawn over the minutiae in a way the general public simply don't. They don't care about Blofeld in the way we do and they won't notice if Swann is a footnote. The ability to end an actors tenure with aplomb has never been so possible.

    I'd much rather kick off an era with aplomb.
  • barryt007barryt007
    Posts: 19,339
    Risico007 wrote: »
    Nolan is not involved can we stop

    Sources ?
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    RC7 wrote: »
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    I'm just not sure what is to be gained from spending another 3 years and 200 million dollars to repair the damage.

    I get where you're coming from, but the 'damage' your talking about is magnified on here. The general public don't give a ****. If a Craig film is released it's still a draw. We fawn over the minutiae in a way the general public simply don't. They don't care about Blofeld in the way we do and they won't notice if Swann is a footnote. The ability to end an actors tenure with aplomb has never been so possible.

    I'd much rather kick off an era with aplomb.

    Hard not to.
  • GetafixGetafix
    Posts: 11,425
    So we think the Nolan talk is baseless?

    Who would have posted it on IMDB then?

    If Nolan were involved I'd assume a new Bond and perhaps multi film arc?
  • QuantumOrganizationQuantumOrganization We have people everywhere
    Posts: 1,187
    You people have created an alternate reality https://www.flickreel.com/bond-25-imdb-confirms-christopher-nolan-is-on-board/
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    QuantumOrganization wrote: »
    You people have created an alternate reality https://www.flickreel.com/bond-25-imdb-confirms-christopher-nolan-is-on-board/

    Exactly. Lots of people with a complete inability to rationalise, read or apply context.
  • AlexanderWaverlyAlexanderWaverly
    Posts: 2,115
    As an aside, what if Eon & Co. decided to bring another classic villain back (afterall, everything started over with 2006's Casino Royale). What if we got Dr. No 2.0 (played by an Asian actor)? Goldfinger 2.0? Scaramanga 2.0? Largo 3.0?

  • BMW_with_missilesBMW_with_missiles All the usual refinements.
    Posts: 3,000
    barryt007 wrote: »
    Risico007 wrote: »
    Nolan is not involved can we stop

    Sources ?

    @barryt007 IMDB removed the mention about Nolan from the page.
    antovolk wrote: »
    IMDB removed the B25 credit from Syncopy's page. So everyone calm down...
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    AlexanderWaverly wrote: »
    As an aside, what if Eon & Co. decided to bring another classic villain back (afterall, everything started over with 2006's Casino Royale). What if we got Dr. No 2.0 (played by an Asian actor)? Goldfinger 2.0? Scaramanga 2.0? Largo 3.0?

    Won't happen. This is why EON, despite the flak, are still the only company capable of maintaining the series. Hire Disney, as some are clamouring for, and Goldfinger's your next villain, Nik Nak your next spin off. No thanks.
  • PanchitoPistolesPanchitoPistoles 2.0
    Posts: 4,619
    antovolk wrote: »
    IMDB removed the B25 credit from Syncopy's page. So everyone calm down...
    Haha. No. Whoever put the B25 credit on Syncopy's page was either trolling or leaked an information that was not supposed to leak yet, so it's only natural imdb removed it. None of this changes the fact that it's highly unlikely Nolan WON'T direct either Bond 25 or Bond 26.
  • barryt007barryt007
    edited May 2017 Posts: 19,339
    BMW_with_missiles wrote: »
    barryt007 wrote: »
    Risico007 wrote: »
    Nolan is not involved can we stop

    Sources ?

    @barryt007 IMDB removed the mention about Nolan from the page.



    Ok thanks matey !
  • BMW_with_missilesBMW_with_missiles All the usual refinements.
    edited May 2017 Posts: 3,000
    barryt007 wrote: »
    BMW_with_missiles wrote: »
    barryt007 wrote: »
    Risico007 wrote: »
    Nolan is not involved can we stop

    Sources ?

    @barryt007 IMDB removed the mention about Nolan from the page.



    Ok thanks matey !

    You're welcome!
  • QuantumOrganizationQuantumOrganization We have people everywhere
    Posts: 1,187
    PanchitoPistoles wrote: »
    antovolk wrote: »
    IMDB removed the B25 credit from Syncopy's page. So everyone calm down...
    Haha. No. Whoever put the B25 credit on Syncopy's page was either trolling or leaked an information that was not supposed to leak yet, so it's only natural imdb removed it. None of this changes the fact that it's highly unlikely Nolan WON'T direct either Bond 25 or Bond 26.
    I'd love to know what your smokin.

  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    QuantumOrganization wrote: »
    PanchitoPistoles wrote: »
    antovolk wrote: »
    IMDB removed the B25 credit from Syncopy's page. So everyone calm down...
    Haha. No. Whoever put the B25 credit on Syncopy's page was either trolling or leaked an information that was not supposed to leak yet, so it's only natural imdb removed it. None of this changes the fact that it's highly unlikely Nolan WON'T direct either Bond 25 or Bond 26.
    I'd love to know what your smokin.

    Me too.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited May 2017 Posts: 23,883
    It's amusing how these rumours keep getting out there and all are occuring while the distribution deal is being worked out. It's almost like folks are testing the waters.

    Nolan
    McGuigan
    Craig's return
    Wright
    P&W

    One can think of a number of influencers and vested interests who would like to see one or more of these scenarios.

    The big one has yet to drop. Mendes.
Sign In or Register to comment.