It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
The Man from UNCLE was a great film.
One man's great is another man's grate. ;)
By the by! Chances David Arnold return? Would you expect them to hire an entirely new composer?
Oakville, Mississauga area. I see you're also from the GTA.
No. Not at all.
We can even say that Captain America: The First Avenger worked as a period action drama.
My point is simply that the original material (Fleming's novels) was set in a distinct period. It would not at all by a "bad thing" to take Bond back to that period. Admittedly, though, Bond films couldn't exist in that era for too long before getting stale.
I do think a Nolan-directed, Hardy-starring Bond would make EON a lot of money. no matter when it's set.
Downtown-- Queen West area... we should get "The Six" together, rent out a rep theatre, and run our own Bond-a-thon!
Interesting interview. He seems very secretive about his Bond vision.
Not if Q invents a time machine.
Well, remember a recent quote,
" I would never tell you that. Those are the only cards I hold. It’s the only chance I have of scoring the gig
I listened to the entire interview. Very illuminating insight into how his mind works and what's important to him. Earlier in the interview he talks generally about what he likes to bring to a blockbuster film:
9:30 to 10:55.
"I want the tricks to be reinvented as it were"
There's the clue about what he probably could do with Bond.
Anyone suggesting that Craig isn't a brilliant actor as @thelivingroyale says has not seen OFITN, Craig is simply mesmerising in this and no their Bond has given a performance of this depth and ability outside the role.
This is unfortunate, as he has been a spectacularly good Bond IMO.
Flawless in CR, QoS and SF.
CR was a near perfect Bond film.
In QoS, Craig's performance was diminished by the rapid-fire editing of the movie itself. It needed more time for his palpable grief to breathe.
SF was a little too ponderous for me, but that's on the director. Craig was brilliant in the role he was assigned.
SP is a strange case. I actually feel that Craig delivered the only performance he could have, being painted into a corner by the writers.
Despite my fears that the brand is currently overly dependent on Craig's desire to return, I think he is a fabulous actor and a dynamic Bond.
Like others, I have enjoyed the various tangents of this production diary thread. I have also noticed a subtle corrosion of the DC canon. Let's not let our (understandable) impatience diminish Craig's imposing legacy.
I'm still a bit on the fence as regards his action sequences but the stirring last 20 mins or so at least shows he could do the patriotic Union Jack parachute aspects of Bond.
Think if he is so keen to do it EON would be insane not to take him up on the offfer as this is quite a British film and I can't really see why it would do much business stateside. Any money it does take in over there will be very largely based on the pulling power of Nolan given the lack of big stars.
The combination of the Nolan and Bond brands would be almost a lock in for $1bil.
I like his films, but tend not to revisit them. They are great, thought-provoking spectacles, but I find little in the way of old-school entertainment.
One area of concern is his obvious calling card for Bond - the snow base in Inception.
Such a clear love letter to OHMSS, his favorite Bond (and mine).
The problem is, the sequence in the movie is flat and uninspired. The action is static and dull. The dramatic stakes do not escalate in satisfactory fashion. Inception, more than anything else, suggested to me that Nolan isn't a great fit for Bond.
Did you see it in IMAX? I want to see it in IMAX so bad.
That's not going to happen methinks. Nolan shoots everything.
I'd be happy to see a Nolan Bond film. It's highly unlikely he could mess it up, or send Bond into hiatus.