It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
So plot will not be down to P+W this time around - instead it will be largely taken care of by Mr. I. Fleming.
Quite an enticing prospect.
EON have allowed themselves plenty of time to develop the script. Presumably DC is insisting that they nail a decent script well in advance. He's had enough nasty surprises on the writing front with previous entries.
Hopefully P+W will just flesh out Fleming's plot and then some script polishers will be brought in to add some class dialogue.
I'd prefer if P+W weren't involved but this approach could still produce a half decent outcome.
That's the way I see it ,and I think Daniel sees it the same way,he will want it done correctly from start to finish.
Happy times indeed,i feel a lot more positive now...very very happy.
I saw no passion in SPECTRE. Mendes himself said he had done anything he wanted to do with a Bond film with Skyfall, Craig was confident with the role but it was not his best performance as Bond, and Newman lazily recycled his score from Skyfall.
Forster, on the other hand, truly cared about QoS and he got Bond way more than Mendes did. Craig looked much better in QoS. And we all know Arnold loves scoring Bond. SPECTRE's script is clearly weaker than QoS', even though SPECTRE disguises it because a lot of money is put on the screen.
Well he wasn't a 00 agent for most of Licence to Kill, so not all that unusual.
What are you doing on here, get off and read YOLT now!
Please don't compare upcoming 007 to Liverpool FC, as I am now preparing for a monumental clusterfart starring Rory "Lovren" Kinnear.
facetiousness?
Yeah, sure. Go and kid yourself.
Chill.
Exactly. Do what the man says, @noSolaceleft.
On the contrary, if Madeleine is also a victim of getting too close to Bond and his world, Bond will know that, however hard he might try and want it, he cannot and will not ever be able to live a normal life. The curse of being a double agent and he can never escape it - and that is actually a powerful character arc.
Reg D.C. - I had wished, he wouldn't do it, because when it goes wrong, his legacy will be in jeopardy. As it is, I hope, they won't allow him too much power, as his decisions are not ALWAYS for the best. Having said that, I am looking forward to all the hoopla going with it. First best luck for LL.
Oh, and madeleine was in love with Bond, we don't know about it the other way, which I don't believe. He just put a little bit of humanity back into him. You really think they let him walk into MI6 if he'd quit the service? He's just going off on holiday.
I think it depends on the director.
As an example, I could more readily and easily accept deviations like we've had over the past three films (which have all been somewhat experimental and 'arty' in some way shape or form) if they'd inserted a run of the mill mission centric quality formula entry in the middle
No,the fact Purity has been temporarily (or will It be permanently) postponed to make room for Daniel to do BOND25 is enough proof.
And he wouldnt lie or fib about something as big as that on a show like that with the situation the way things are at the moment re Bond,he cares about the character too much.
He is back.
The longest serving Bond and either 5 or 6 highly successful Bond films behind him when he goes,means today is a happy day to be a fan of 007 !!
Quite strange to say the least. Like he was having fun with all of us. The joke's on us.
Absolutely. I love the fact the tabloids were pulling articles left, right and centre. Played again by DC.
He knew the tabloids tore into him over 'that' comment ,so he has just got his own back.
Something his alter-ego Mr Bond might well have done.
I'm thinking that they made a deal behind the curtain. Perhaps Colbert gets JB "you heard it here first" scoops and in return he, or CBS, have to promote the film ad infinitum when it arrives? And why does Craig fancy speaking only to Colbert (he once did a Kimmel sketch though)? Craig even said that he had to tell Colbert first. I know it sounds like he's buttering him up and that stuff is omnipresent on Late Night, but Craig hates being fake. He aims to be so genuine that it is close to ironic. So there is no reason why he'd need to say it like that, unless there was some other motive...
Also, Stephen Colbert is the next Bond? I am so done with the series. He will be as bad as Brosnan.