It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Yeah, I agree. I recall that Lindy Hemming was still costume designer then....and she forgot that Brosnan left the role.
That would have been a much better ending. Did that version still have Blofeld's pilot forgetting that helicopters don't have to follow rivers while being shot at?
Indeed. MR is in every way a superior film to SP. I'd even say DAD is superior to SP.
Grotesque really. At least the Nine Eyes program actually -unofficially- exists. It's entirely based on reality.
But building a space station outside geostationary orbit (MR) and building a space weapon that can carve out an entire border (DAD) is less silly and more realistic? God, I find that nothing more than an exaggeration.
I agree. This is Daniel Craig, and we live an an era with different fashion standards as those in the 1990's. I just don't see Craig wearing suits that are regular or loose fit. It makes him look like a dwarf in them. Daniel Craig is a relatively short person, so you want to accentuate that in a reversed way, by making him look taller. To do that you want him to wear slim-fit, tailored suits. Like these:
Moreover, Daniel Craig's Bond has got rougher edges, so a slightly 'criminal' look looks better on him I think. And that's why I also don't mind a few wrinkles in the used fabrics. That's Tom Ford. Brioni is for oldies like Brosnan. And I think Jany Temime deserves a bit more credit here. Let's move on, Lindy Hemming does other movies now. So please stop this kind of nonsense:
By the way, I think Daniel Craig himself, like many other Bond-actors before him, has really developed a wonderful 'Bond' style outside work. It's one of those things where you can see that the actual actors are proud/were proud to be Bond:
Especially the way it looks in the first picture we like to call in Germany "Kampfgartenzwerg" (fight garden dwarf so to speak ). No way that looks good, let alone elegant.
I never said more realistic, just better. I consider them better films.
There are loads of WMDs out there far more advanced than revealed to the public. Some class them as "myths" because there is no proof. And those "myths" are so damn heavily guarded they are even ready to kill you for it if you even think about laying a look on the actual existing material.
What? You're going to say that invisible cars are not realistic next? The concept is there, tested and that "adaptive camouflage" I am sure in government hands is far more advanced.
Area 51. Look it up.
I'm afraid you might be right. Just shows the wisdom of thinking about your actions before you commit them. Well, I'm not too old to learn yet.
You know as the saying goes, "One is never too old to learn from the master, Mister Kidd." :))
I've been doing a Bondathon recently and just got up to the PB Bonds and CR, and really enjoyed having the David Arnold scores.
PS: I'm no Arnold fan either. He's had his five.
Regarding the invisible car - yes it does exist. There was nothing wrong with it conceptually in DAD imho. It was just used poorly in a portion of the film that had already jumped the shark (wave?). So credibility had already been forfeited by this point.
I wouldn't mind Zimmer (or one of his disciples, like Jackman) taking on B26.
More than anything I want a new sound for Bond. Nobody can do Barry like Barry and I don't want hacks to try.
You're quite finky, aren't you?
After two times enduring Newman I should assume that most everybody welcomes Arnold on his knees.
Admittedly you very much have a point here.