SPECTRE Trailer/TV Spot Thread - NEW TV Spots Page 117 - Final Trailer Page 106

1113114116118119

Comments

  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,592
    It could have been added in post production to give the audience a clearer direction of what follows after.
  • chipstickschipsticks NOT on TheDanielCraigForum where they think know Daniel Craig personally and Léa and Monica are ugly
    Posts: 560
    thank you @Gustav_Graves :-bd
  • edited October 2015 Posts: 10
    For all the people complaining about the CGI collapse looking fake, I think the yellow hue has a lot to do with it too. Maybe it will fit better with the film when I see it, but I really don't understand why such a drastic color change was necessary.
  • edited October 2015 Posts: 10
    Edit: is there a way to delete posts? I just goofed up and posted a few extra times by mistake.
  • Does anyone else feel as if this film could've been directed by Martin Campbell? So much about the trailers and TV-spots so far gives me GoldenEye and Casino Royale vibes, in a good way as they're two of my favourites. I figure Spectre will be as traditional a Bond film as we can possibly get in this day and age. I loved Skyfall too, but everything about Spectre feels more larger-than-life.
  • Posts: 1,870
    I love the fact that things are looking larger than life.................. It's a Bond film.............It's supposed to be larger than life. BTW I don't see anything wrong with the CGI other than we know it has to be CGI just because of the way the shot is composed.
  • imranbecksimranbecks Singapore
    edited October 2015 Posts: 984
    I'm fine with CGI. But there is a difference between using CGI that looks realistic or convincing, then there are those CGI that just looks too fake or cheesy. The roof collapse part for instance just looked too fake and cheap..lol... Maybe it does indeed have something to do with the tone and colour of that scene. I hope it has been polished or touched up to make it seem more realistic in the final cut.
  • HMBFFHMBFF Lisboa, Portugal
    edited October 2015 Posts: 204
    @Gustav_Graves, add this one to your list. First 20" TV Spot (no new footage):

    http://sonypicturesuk.tumblr.com/post/131096712887

    PS: Indulge my curiosity Gustav, why you call them TV Trailers instead of TV Spots?
  • Posts: 11,119
    HMBFF wrote: »
    PS: Indulge my curiosity Gustav, why you call them TV Trailers instead of TV Spots?

    Ufff, I actually don't know :-o.
  • Posts: 3,164
    Yeah, also I think referring to the TV spots as trailers and them including them in the trailer count may confuse some, there have only been three trailers, and 8 TV spots (not including cut downs of full 30s ones like the 20s one you posted @HMBFF), and 10 Vlog featurettes (including the Heineken and Visit Britain ones)
  • Posts: 5,767
    imranbecks wrote: »
    What do you think about the collapsing building in Mexico City? Some of the CGI effects seem not so good, specially when Craig is looking how the building collapses.

    I don't really like it coz it really looks too CGI... Not really convincing especially when he turns around to run and the whole roof beneath him caved in, that too looked so fake. Hate having to cringe like that CGI surfing scene in DAD..lol
    It shouldn´t be more cringeworthy than the general lighting concept.

  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 14,680


    The cuts on M's forehead- is it intentional that they read 'I6'? Or is the writing only on the wall?
  • Posts: 5,745
    QBranch wrote: »


    The cuts on M's forehead- is it intentional that they read 'I6'? Or is the writing only on the wall?

    I don't think there's a secret message in the cuts on M.'s head.
  • tqbtqb
    edited October 2015 Posts: 1,022
    All this CGI talk. I thought it looked good. Infact they probably used a miniature set and just merged DC with it. It's a lot better than those Komodo Dragons, elevator shaft, and helicopters on silva's island in SF.
  • TripAcesTripAces Universal Exports
    edited October 2015 Posts: 4,589
    JWESTBROOK wrote: »
    QBranch wrote: »


    The cuts on M's forehead- is it intentional that they read 'I6'? Or is the writing only on the wall?

    I don't think there's a secret message in the cuts on M.'s head.

    I don't either, but it actually does sort of look like a "16." It also looks like a bad case of shingles.
  • mcdonbbmcdonbb deep in the Heart of Texas
    Posts: 4,116
    tqb wrote: »
    All this CGI talk. I thought it looked good. Infact they probably used a miniature set and just merged DC with it. It's a lot better than those Komodo Dragons, elevator shaft, and helicopters on silva's island in SF.

    I agree. They deliberately "shook" the camera to help the audience "feel" the impact of the fall which I think the CGI police are claiming as bad CGI.

    DAD clearly had bad CGI in that notorious wind surf scene but enough whining already.

  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 14,680
    TripAces wrote: »
    JWESTBROOK wrote: »
    QBranch wrote: »


    The cuts on M's forehead- is it intentional that they read 'I6'? Or is the writing only on the wall?
    I don't think there's a secret message in the cuts on M.'s head.
    I don't either, but it actually does sort of look like a "16." It also looks like a bad case of shingles.
    Just thought it was amusing to see 'I6' on M (MI6)...
  • Posts: 11,119
    tqb wrote: »
    All this CGI talk. I thought it looked good. Infact they probably used a miniature set and just merged DC with it. It's a lot better than those Komodo Dragons, elevator shaft, and helicopters on silva's island in SF.

    I agree. I'm getting so fucking tired of it. Man, SEE THE MOVIE first, full 150 mins. People need to quit over-analizing this! It's annoying. Then again, it's James Bond.

    I was checking some forums about Star Wars and Hunger Games. These franchises suffer from the same lunatics...simply because they are insanely big.
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 14,680
    Boycotting Spectre, that CGI fiasco.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    QBranch wrote: »
    Boycotting Spectre, that CGI fiasco.
    Yeah, and did you HEAR what Dan said the other day?
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 14,680
    QBranch wrote: »
    Boycotting Spectre, that CGI fiasco.
    Yeah, and did you HEAR what Dan said the other day?
    No, boycotting Craig. Guy mumbles too much.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    QBranch wrote: »
    QBranch wrote: »
    Boycotting Spectre, that CGI fiasco.
    Yeah, and did you HEAR what Dan said the other day?
    No, boycotting Craig. Guy mumbles too much.

    He mumbled that it was rather such a blast to make the wonderful Bond films. The drunken journalist wrote down "rather slash my wrists than make another Bond film."
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    edited October 2015 Posts: 9,020
    Craig is too exhausted to mumble, he had to make a movie imagine that :))
  • mcdonbbmcdonbb deep in the Heart of Texas
    edited October 2015 Posts: 4,116
    QBranch wrote: »
    Boycotting Spectre, that CGI fiasco.

    If sarcasm then yours doesn't work any better than Craig's.

    If you are actually boycotting, your choice. I'm not a fair weather fan. I sat through and enjoyed my least favorite Bond at least four times in the cinema.

    @Bondjasonbond006 despite his reservations for Craig as Bond is still going in open-minded.



  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    mcdonbb wrote: »
    QBranch wrote: »
    Boycotting Spectre, that CGI fiasco.

    If sarcasm then yours doesn't work any better than Craig's.

    If you are actually boycotting, your choice. I'm not a fair weather fan. I sat through and enjoyed my least favorite Bond at least four times in the cinema.

    @Bondjasonbond006 despite his reservations for Craig as Bond is still going in open-minded.



    Clearly sarcasm.
  • mcdonbbmcdonbb deep in the Heart of Texas
    Posts: 4,116
    RC7 wrote: »
    mcdonbb wrote: »
    QBranch wrote: »
    Boycotting Spectre, that CGI fiasco.

    If sarcasm then yours doesn't work any better than Craig's.

    If you are actually boycotting, your choice. I'm not a fair weather fan. I sat through and enjoyed my least favorite Bond at least four times in the cinema.

    @Bondjasonbond006 despite his reservations for Craig as Bond is still going in open-minded.



    Clearly sarcasm.

    You never know on here ...well at least I didn't this time.

    Hope so...

  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    mcdonbb wrote: »
    RC7 wrote: »
    mcdonbb wrote: »
    QBranch wrote: »
    Boycotting Spectre, that CGI fiasco.

    If sarcasm then yours doesn't work any better than Craig's.

    If you are actually boycotting, your choice. I'm not a fair weather fan. I sat through and enjoyed my least favorite Bond at least four times in the cinema.

    @Bondjasonbond006 despite his reservations for Craig as Bond is still going in open-minded.



    Clearly sarcasm.

    You never know on here ...well at least I didn't this time.

    Hope so...

    I LOVE sarcasm :))
    Q Branch maybe ;)
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    mcdonbb wrote: »
    QBranch wrote: »
    Boycotting Spectre, that CGI fiasco.

    If sarcasm then yours doesn't work any better than Craig's.

    If you are actually boycotting, your choice. I'm not a fair weather fan. I sat through and enjoyed my least favorite Bond at least four times in the cinema.

    @Bondjasonbond006 despite his reservations for Craig as Bond is still going in open-minded.



    Hey thanks.
    I love all Bond movies. Even DAF :))
    If Spectre is another Casino Royale I sure will look at this current era in a different light.
    For me it's more about the movies than the actors. Craig just happens to be my least favourite (excluding Lazenby for having done only one movie). I find him overrated in context of all the praise that goes on, especially when people have the audacity to claim he is as good as Connery. Furthermore I'm getting more critical with age and don't just take anything for Gold that gets dished up ;)
  • Posts: 1,314
    irony.....

    On the trailer TV spot with m, money penny and q are they in a pub or something?
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    Matt007 wrote: »
    irony.....

    On the trailer TV spot with m, money penny and q are they in a pub or something?

    Rules in Covent Garden.
Sign In or Register to comment.