It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
In the Castilian-Spanish and in the Latino-Spanish it is the same voice, too. However, I think it´s some kind of "mistake" . I´m afraid we must wait to know.
I'd never argue that you aren't confident. I'm just amused (playfully, nothing mean spirited) by you and those arguing that it's Scott being, as you put it, confident in your hearing and listening. Both sides are basically annoyed and surprised that the other can't hear what they are hearing, all of this when no on has viewed and heard that dialogue in context.
Maybe there is a reason...
I'm not trying to be overly argumentative...but this discussion is a nice way for me to get my post count up. I want #1000 to be my review of Spectre. So I have a lot of posting to do between now and then to time it just right. :D
LOL. I could use a bump up too.
IT IS WATLZ. NO QUESTION ABOUT IT. I DARE YOU TO POST AGAINT SAYING THAT IT ISN'T.
Well they couldn't very well drop him for real lol :P
Being in a Bond film is all about the sacrifice!
They dropped someone for real!
Well, that's the whole thing @mcdonbb . Just watch Sandor's fall in TSWLM. In those days you could only make it appear as if someone really fell. People in those days weren't attached to high cables on big cranes. I guess first time they used wires were actually in MR.
Hence why I think CGI is so incredibly important and, especially on here, an underappreciated art of moviemaking. I mean, back in 1973 Guy Hamilton risked the life of his crew to 'play' with these crocs. As of today it's even way more dangerous to do a similar trick with komodo dragons! People tend to forget that completely sometimes.
CGI is very important. Thank God we have Steve Begg and his team doing all this stuff right at this very moment. Otherwise we could not have included such gripping scenes like those with the komodo dragons, the entire destruction of the MI6-building and all that jumping from high altitudes! :-)
Yup. I know some people really want Andrew Scott to be Blofeld but that's pulling strings.
I think "perfect" isn't the correct word to describe what we received in the film, as the practical slow motion fall we saw in the trailers was much, much better. Just another instance of unnecessary CGI in SF that takes me right out of the experience.
This is exactly what I mean @Talos7 . It's the first time I see that these mountains on the background of "Mad Max" were actually....fake @-) . And in all honesty, after the first time I watched "SkyFall" in cinema I really couldn't see anything 'fakeness' about the komodo dragons or the terrorist attack on the MI6-building.
I think we have to accept the fact that without CGI nowadays movies would look less realistic....how weird that may sound.
I don't blame you really. I've exposed myself to so many movies with it. I tend to watch the syfy channel alot and those movies are packed full of crappy CGI. I'm thankful that Many big budget movie's CGI isn't that bad. Though I thought the CGI in Kingsman was laughable and comparable to that of a syfy channel. :))
The faces, absolutely, not so much, if any, the rest.
Forgetting CGI for a moment I prefer the one they used in the film. It was a violent death ...not the ballerina type fall used the trailer.