› ›

RIP Sir Christopher Lee

124

Comments

  • LudovicoLudovico
    Posts: 15,124
    BAIN123 wrote: »
    Instead another Bond villain got the role of Loomis ;)

    And I think Pleasence was the best choice: Lee would have looked far too intimidating against the Shape.
  • KerimKerim Istanbul Not Constantinople
    Posts: 2,629
    CHORnH9VIAEdV9H.jpg
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,183
    And the only other one who ever played Loomis sadly never got to be a Bond villain (so far...).

    Last night, I watched The Wicker Man again. Christopher Lee is monumental!
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    We never had a Bond villain as iconic as Christopher Lee.
  • MrcogginsMrcoggins Following in the footsteps of Quentin Quigley.
    Posts: 3,144
    Thunderfinger wrote: »
    We never had a Bond villain as iconic as Christopher Lee.
    . Hear Hear TF well said.

  • MayDayDiVicenzoMayDayDiVicenzo Here and there
    Posts: 5,080
    Thunderfinger wrote: »
    We never had a Bond villain as iconic as Christopher Lee.

    Indeed.

    Unlike Blofeld, who is often parodied, Scaramanga is well-regarded and treated with respect, no doubt of course, because of Christopher Lee himself.
  • LudovicoLudovico
    Posts: 15,124
    MayDayDiVicenzo wrote: »
    Thunderfinger wrote: »
    We never had a Bond villain as iconic as Christopher Lee.

    Indeed.

    Unlike Blofeld, who is often parodied, Scaramanga is well-regarded and treated with respect, no doubt of course, because of Christopher Lee himself.

    He could have been Blofeld.
  • Perilagu_KhanPerilagu_Khan
    Posts: 2,483
    He could have been Bond.
  • BAIN123BAIN123
    Posts: 11,189
    I'm surprised no one has put this up:

  • LudovicoLudovico
    Posts: 15,124
    Perilagu_Khan wrote: »
    He could have been Bond.

    I always thought he looked too... monstrous for it. He was born to play a Bond villain.

    What I find admirable as well is that he had such a vast culture. I think he was maybe the only actor who played Dracula to ever bother reading and understanding the novel properly.
  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    edited June 2015 Posts: 5,131
    He actually fitted Fleming's description (bar the accent/ voice) of Scaramanga too. Average film, excellent villan.
  • LudovicoLudovico
    Posts: 15,124
    suavejmf wrote: »
    He actually fitted Fleming's description (bar the accent/ voice) of Scaramanga too. Average film, excellent villan.

    actually Scaramanga in the novel was far more vulgar and brutish. Lee has an elegance that the villain did not have. All the same Lee saves the film.
  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 5,131
    In appearance he is like Lee in the book. Gaunt, pale, tall, evil stare (by desription I meant appearance). Yes you are right, in the book is more of a thug (personality wise).
  • NicNacNicNac Administrator, Moderator
    Posts: 7,582
    Thunderfinger wrote: »
    We never had a Bond villain as iconic as Christopher Lee.

    Are you....absolutely sure about that?

    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcST5ywrCLlBL8xtV2jPmSOHNnaXshhclr4vWcHe4-CHnBJlQ9sC
  • bondtheorybondtheory
    Posts: 96
    Perhaps iconic in that he was already an established star of heavy roles, prior to his becoming Scaramanga.
  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 5,131
    NicNac wrote: »
    Thunderfinger wrote: »
    We never had a Bond villain as iconic as Christopher Lee.

    Are you....absolutely sure about that?

    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcST5ywrCLlBL8xtV2jPmSOHNnaXshhclr4vWcHe4-CHnBJlQ9sC

    Is this a joke? I assume so. Ha ha. Stephens was poor.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,183
    @suavejmf, Surely @NicNac meant that as a joke. ;-)
  • timmertimmer
    edited June 2015 Posts: 4,622
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    @suavejmf, Surely @NicNac meant that as a joke. ;-)
    That's a good joke. Selecting a shot of arguably the least iconic villain in the series, with apologies to Almaric as Domenic Greene., of course.

    :P
  • BAIN123BAIN123
    Posts: 11,189
    @NicNac should have put the screenshot of Stephens in the robot gear :))
  • NicNacNicNac Administrator, Moderator
    Posts: 7,582
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    @suavejmf, Surely @NicNac meant that as a joke. ;-)

    Natch ;)
    BAIN123 wrote: »
    @NicNac should have put the screenshot of Stephens in the robot gear :))

    I did try BAIN I really did, but it kept failing. I'm not techy enough.
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    NicNac wrote: »
    Thunderfinger wrote: »
    We never had a Bond villain as iconic as Christopher Lee.

    Are you....absolutely sure about that?

    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcST5ywrCLlBL8xtV2jPmSOHNnaXshhclr4vWcHe4-CHnBJlQ9sC

    It's Panto, but I bloody love Stevens in DAD. Sue me. If there's ever an MI6 get together you can tie me to a wicker chair and whip my balls. I'll just continue to repeat the phrase, 'But my dreams can kill you', over and over until you give in and I win.
  • DaltonCraig007DaltonCraig007 They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."
    edited June 2015 Posts: 15,718
    Both Graves and Jinx are terribly written characters, but where Halle Berry makes her role much, much worse, Toby Stevens hams it up so much that he becomes highly entertaining, and is the highlight of DAD along with Brosnan and Pike.
  • BAIN123BAIN123
    Posts: 11,189
    I suppose he's a bit like TLJ in Batman Forever. So ridiculous you can't help but find him enjoyable.
  • timmertimmer
    edited June 2015 Posts: 4,622
    Oh, you are not wrong there, Stephens is so OTT, his performance works real well at times.
    He does a good brat prince villain.
    I even think his hamminess is often by design.
    It's just the villain character himself, is not terribly iconic or as interesting as most of the others, I don't think, but Stephens performance does have it's moments.
  • LudovicoLudovico
    Posts: 15,124
    Stephens does a Euro trash villain, mixed with Minime. He's just plain awful. No redeeming qualities whatsoever.
  • BAIN123BAIN123
    Posts: 11,189
    But...but...but...he's funny.
  • DragonpolDragonpol https://thebondologistblog.blogspot.com
    Posts: 18,281
    BAIN123 wrote: »
    But...but...but...he's funny.

    Yes, and that means everything.
  • BAIN123BAIN123
    Posts: 11,189
    Back to Christopher Lee. Great anecdote from Mark Kermode:

  • KerimKerim Istanbul Not Constantinople
    edited June 2015 Posts: 2,629
    DaltonCraig007 wrote: »
    Both Graves and Jinx are terribly written characters, but where Halle Berry makes her role much, much worse, Toby Stevens hams it up so much that he becomes highly entertaining, and is the highlight of DAD along with Brosnan and Pike.

    Talking about DAD in a Christopher Lee thread is just wrong.

  • LudovicoLudovico
    Posts: 15,124
    Kerim wrote: »
    DaltonCraig007 wrote: »
    Both Graves and Jinx are terribly written characters, but where Halle Berry makes her role much, much worse, Toby Stevens hams it up so much that he becomes highly entertaining, and is the highlight of DAD along with Brosnan and Pike.

    Talking about DAD in a Christopher Lee thread is just wrong.

    Agreed. Lets go back on topic.
Sign In or Register to comment.