It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
LTK > QOS
2-0 Dalton, pretty easy decisions.
LTK > QOS
Dalton wins but my total ranking is TLD > CR > LTK > QOS
LTK over QOS (easier decision, LTK top 5 film)
LTK>>>QOS
1-1.
CR-TLD = tied
QOS-LTK = tied
I'm sorry. This is the best I can do. Because I think I like their both movies equally.
It's a tie.
TLD vs. CR= CR
LTK vs. QoS= LTK
What a surprise. (:| Another tie!
From a 007 standpoint, they're really equally matched. Both brought 007 back to a gritty, dark aspect not found with their predecessor. Right now, I'd choose Daniel Craig as the better of the two.
LTK vs QOS Winner- LTK
This is actually the only tie I've had. Every other round had a clear winner for me.
LTK > QOS
Dalton wins.
LTK > QOS
Although my ranking is; LTK, TLD, CR and QOS.
LTK > QOS
LTK>>QOS
LTK>>CR
TLD>>QOS
Dalton 4-0.
TLD > CR
LTK > QOS
TLD and LTK are my overall #1 and #2, whereas CR and QOS are tucked away down in my bottom 5.
LTK is #9 on my list and QoS is #8 so much much closer.
2-0 win to the Craigster.
QOS > LTK (again, only by a hair)
I loathe Daniel Craig's Bond and his reboot films and love Timothy Dalton's portrayal and his two great Bond films so it is an easy choice for me.
LTK > QOS
Dalton for the win
Need I say anything more? ;-)
QoS > LTK (I don't really enjoy LTK much, it's good, but it's too violent and not really my Bond film for me, i enjoy QoS quite a bit more to be honest)
- Well for me Craig wins on films AND on acting
LTK > QOS