It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
That said there is evidence Fleming could have pondered at times to turn Bond into a brand like The Saint, with different writers picking up his character and continuing the business. Fleming suggested to Rex Stout to write a book together and made a similar offer to Len Deighton, perhaps in neither case entirely jokingly. At any rate it seems likely the example of The Saint might have made him think about a similar way to commercialise his hero beyond the film rights.
I dont think if it does , we have Bond on a movie now .
I could just see some money spinning saboteur for a certain film company thinking about killing him off and rebooting him into a kid action hero like Superman is going to be X(
Or retiring him and making his nephew or someone made up take over X(
In other words we have been spared the fashionable reboot into a kids film, although DAD came damn close!
Arthur Conan Doyle tried to get rid of Sherlock Holmes several times, but the public kept demanding his return.
EON just need those notebooks that have been mentioned recently...
(Fleming thought it would be a good idea for bond to infiltrate a masquerade dressed as clown I believe and there was the idea of a climax on a national monument but Fleming couldn't decide which one)
There were a few titles that Fleming liked as well a character name or 2
so yes Fleming was thinking of continuing on with 007
I believe someone here had a ton more detail on the contents of the notebook but I can't remember who I know it was DEFINITELY this forum.
Who knows maybe if Fleming had survived the next bond novel after TMWGG would of been Skyfall hey you never know right?
or maybe Colonel Sun written by Fleming?
you never know.
My greatest fear however would have been that had Fleming remained alive and had witnessed the huge success of his character what would have been the consequences to his writing. Already the actor Sean Connery had an impact on the last book Fleming wrote where 007 got some Scottish roots. Would Fleming have written more towards the movie character or remain faithfull to his own version.
I would also point out that practically every great Bond movie was originally based upon an Fleming novel e.g. CR, FRWL and OHMSS
Mind, had Fleming kept writing Bond - had he lived a bit longer - then I suspect the 'law of diminishing returns' would have kicked in. Plus, Fleming's Bond's in the late '60s and '70s wouldn't quite have fitted those eras as it so perfectly did the '50s and early-mid-'60s.
Having said all that, he probably wouldn't have carried on with Bond had he lived longer. He'd been churning one out every year for over a decade - I suspect he'd have probably decided he was all Bonded-out...
I think the reason the continuations took off was because the last "advertized" Bond (so to speak) was Colonel Sun, not long after Fleming's death, and then there was a period of fourteen or fifteen years before a new original Bond novel came out. That greater gap of time gave us a greater appreciation for the character, and thus his return was marked as a grand occasion, instead of if there'd only been a decade, where we'd basically just be "oh, hey, new Bond novel came out last wednesday", which is what I think happened when Benson took over, and why so few continuation novels are made today.
Basically, what I'm saying is that we need long gaps, so that when new novels are made again, the satisfaction will live longer. So, sad as it is to say, perhaps Fleming died at the right time.
A valid point. The cinematic Bond displays a surprising talent for adaptation to modern politics, technology and geography. But would Fleming have trapped him in the '60s or would he too have kept pushing Bond two minutes into the future?
And mightn't that have been the best choice ultimately? Now at least, Fleming kept the Bonds tight and precise, superbly written and creatively conceived. Even his last effort, often chewed out as an inferior book, is great material IMO.
I know it's been used as a fan fiction title but "My Enemy's Enemy" (from Fleming's scrapbook) would have been good
Look at it this way: he's always been more interested in earning money than in earning recognition of the serious intellectual circles. Make no mistake, he wanted that too, craved for it, coquetted with what he could write if he only was interested enough. It hurt him badly that he was widely considered an author of cheap pulp thrillers for the masses. But had he had the choice he would always have chosen the cash. He couldn't help himself, it was just his nature.
But I think there is also one other strong motive that's perhaps often overlooked when Fleming is discussed: Bond enabled Fleming to relive that time of his life, the war. And Bond gave him an excuse to foster his daydreams, to cultivate and relish them. It was an outlet for his fantasies and a passable means to indulge. Fleming minus Bond would not have been a happy man for a long time. The regular exercise of his adventure muscle had become a necessity for him, especially as it provided a retreat from his troubled private life. Fleming may have been pretty worn out by TMWTGG but the book has some strong ideas and scenes and with the necessary time and health I think Fleming could have gone on for quite some time. I doubt he'd have been able to keep his hands off the typewriter for longer than a year or two.