Where does Bond go after Craig?

1686687688689690692»

Comments

  • Posts: 842
    What do we think of THR's bold 2025 prediction that Josh O'Connor will be named the next Bond?

    https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/lists/predicting-hollywood-2025-james-bond-taylor-sheridan/the-next-james-bond-will-be/

    The same Josh O'Connor who just happened to be matched with Daniel Craig for Actors on Actors recently...

  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    edited 6:10pm Posts: 41,011
    I don't believe we'll get an actor announced next year, but we'll see.

    I feel it's more likely they were paired up here because of the latest Knives Out film they star in together, not because they're secret signaling who the next 007 is.
  • edited 6:16pm Posts: 4,281
    I wouldn't be amazingly surprised if he got the part, or at least an actor along the lines of him. But at the same time he's not a top choice of mine and it's not a given. It's not an outlandish prediction though. An actor getting announced next year is very optimistic though. And no, there's no hidden meaning in him getting paired with Craig.
  • Posts: 567
    Obviously it's all speculation and doesn't mean anything, but O'Connor would be a huge win for EON.
  • edited 6:57pm Posts: 388
    Is it plausible, possible or preferable to cast an actor as Bond and hire a director to develop the next movie from script to screen?

    Instead of enticing a director and actor with a developed screenplay/treatment that needs retooled, the creative team (EON, lead actor, director and screenwriter) could work from the very beginning on crafting a movie that plays directly into everyone’s strengths. Thus (hopefully) resulting in a Bond film that’s specific and clear in its themes, motifs and overall design.

    Putting aside that Daniel Craig’s first Bond film was the adaption of an already existing work, what if Craig and Martin Campbell and Paul Haggis/P&W were brought onboard Bond 21’s production in late 2004 to develop a screenplay and direction for the series from scratch?
  • Posts: 1,866
    If the next Bond trailer could capture the feeling of the new Superman teaser I would be happy camper. The main thing is that is NOT an origin story.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    edited 8:54pm Posts: 8,440
    You nailed it. Whatever someone takes away from the trailer, no one can deny its a massive departure from what Cavills Superman films were tonally. Just like Batman Begins was a massive shift after B&R and Casino Royale was a huge shake up after DAD.

    I don't think people realise sometimes how thorough of a overhaul we could be in for by the time B26 rolls around. Remember, B25 wrapped filming in late 2019, when the world was a completely different place than it is today in so many ways. After the rollarcoaster the last few years have been, people are ready to turn over a new page, and the entertain we consume is finally beginning to reflect that.
  • edited 9:56pm Posts: 4,281
    Well, it's tricky departing completely from what we got with NTTD because it has such swings in terms of tone and is so far away from how the Craig era began. Even if they went all in with something more fantastical, breezy, and mid Moore era esque it'd still have similarities to that film in places.

    That's not to say it won't be different. If I were a betting man I'd guess in practice Bond 26 could be a bit like the new Batman film coming after Nolan's trilogy. There's a lot of overlap between the two in terms of themes and the more grounded approach, even if they have differences. They're not a million miles away from each other. I can't see a complete 180 along the lines of DAF coming after OHMSS. But hey, who knows? I can't see the future...

    I can imagine a scenario where some fans will initially believe Bond 26 is a lot more different to the Craig films than it actually will end up being. It'll obviously be a fresh start so that'll have some impact. Instead of a 50 something retired Bond at a very specific point in the Craig films, it'll likely be a 30 something Bond who's a 00. There'll be more that's inherently familiar (or perhaps 'traditional') from a Bond formula standpoint just due to that blank slate. Trailers will want to create a bit more hype/energy around the new actor so that might well create the impression amongst some of us that the film will be 'lighter' than it actually is. In practice the actual film could still contain a good bit of the Craig era's sense of fatalism and even re-adapt many of the ideas in there. Again, different - perhaps even in some very key areas - but not a million miles away from the later Craig films.
  • Posts: 1,866
    007HallY wrote: »
    Well, it's tricky departing completely from what we got with NTTD because it has such swings in terms of tone and is so far away from how the Craig era began. Even if they went all in with something more fantastical, breezy, and mid Moore era esque it'd still have similarities to that film in places.

    That's not to say it won't be different. If I were a betting man I'd guess in practice Bond 26 could be a bit like the new Batman film coming after Nolan's trilogy. There's a lot of overlap between the two in terms of themes and the more grounded approach, even if they have differences. They're not a million miles away from each other. I can't see a complete 180 along the lines of DAF coming after OHMSS. But hey, who knows? I can't see the future...

    I can imagine a scenario where some fans will initially believe Bond 26 is a lot more different to the Craig films than it actually will end up being. It'll obviously be a fresh start so that'll have some impact. Instead of a 50 something retired Bond at a very specific point in the Craig films, it'll likely be a 30 something Bond who's a 00. There'll be more that's inherently familiar (or perhaps 'traditional') from a Bond formula standpoint just due to that blank slate. Trailers will want to create a bit more hype/energy around the new actor so that might well create the impression amongst some of us that the film will be 'lighter' than it actually is. In practice the actual film could still contain a good bit of the Craig era's sense of fatalism and even re-adapt many of the ideas in there. Again, different - perhaps even in some very key areas - but not a million miles away from the later Craig films.

    But the new Superman trailer does NOT care who played him in the past. It does NOT point out that it is a new actor, it is about the character of Superman and his most familiar elements.
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    Posts: 6,360
    AgentM72 wrote: »
    What do we think of THR's bold 2025 prediction that Josh O'Connor will be named the next Bond?

    https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/lists/predicting-hollywood-2025-james-bond-taylor-sheridan/the-next-james-bond-will-be/

    The same Josh O'Connor who just happened to be matched with Daniel Craig for Actors on Actors recently...


    I said this, way up in this thread somewhere. ;)
  • edited 10:45pm Posts: 4,281
    delfloria wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    Well, it's tricky departing completely from what we got with NTTD because it has such swings in terms of tone and is so far away from how the Craig era began. Even if they went all in with something more fantastical, breezy, and mid Moore era esque it'd still have similarities to that film in places.

    That's not to say it won't be different. If I were a betting man I'd guess in practice Bond 26 could be a bit like the new Batman film coming after Nolan's trilogy. There's a lot of overlap between the two in terms of themes and the more grounded approach, even if they have differences. They're not a million miles away from each other. I can't see a complete 180 along the lines of DAF coming after OHMSS. But hey, who knows? I can't see the future...

    I can imagine a scenario where some fans will initially believe Bond 26 is a lot more different to the Craig films than it actually will end up being. It'll obviously be a fresh start so that'll have some impact. Instead of a 50 something retired Bond at a very specific point in the Craig films, it'll likely be a 30 something Bond who's a 00. There'll be more that's inherently familiar (or perhaps 'traditional') from a Bond formula standpoint just due to that blank slate. Trailers will want to create a bit more hype/energy around the new actor so that might well create the impression amongst some of us that the film will be 'lighter' than it actually is. In practice the actual film could still contain a good bit of the Craig era's sense of fatalism and even re-adapt many of the ideas in there. Again, different - perhaps even in some very key areas - but not a million miles away from the later Craig films.

    But the new Superman trailer does NOT care who played him in the past. It does NOT point out that it is a new actor, it is about the character of Superman and his most familiar elements.

    Well, it cares about getting audiences hyped for the new Superman and film (as every trailer/new era of Superhero movies would do). Any new Bond trailer would do the same, right down to the ‘familiar elements’. I’m not really sure what your point here is.
Sign In or Register to comment.