It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Nope. I opened a new topic for that, which is spoiler-free :-):
http://www.mi6community.com/index.php?p=/discussion/13462/spectre-official-critics-review-topic-accumulative-topic-no-spoilers-just-links#latest
So far half of the reviews have 5 stars, other half have 4 stars, and only two of them have 3 stars.
you mean of the reviews that you included ;)
Financial Times has it at 2 out of 5 stars, and there are way more than only two 3 stars ratings, just saying :)
Finally the most genuine, lovely, funny interview I've heard. Nick Grimshaw is so funny, positive, has lots of self-depreciating humour, and is the first presenter who openly shouts: "I want you to stay 007 forever man! Let's organize a petition <<Daniel Craig needs to stay!>> and the entire world signs it!". You could feel/hear that Daniel Craig really liked this remark :-). The man deserves such a remark, instead of hearing constantly the same question over and over again....
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p035vf5n
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p035wnt8
skyfall was shot on 2,7k which is twice the quality of 1080p but SP will be sure better on 4k which is 4 times better than 1080p
You maybe want to sound like the voice of reason, but it only sounds negative on purpose. I wonder, why this is.
Financial Times is not the place I'd go to for an expert film review. Just like GQ is not where I'd go for investment advice.
Yes very anxious for his opinion.
The Aussie press love the film "New James Bond film is 007 at his best"
A California paper said "Dan, Waltz battle has only just begun, what one gets the Oscar"
;)
Why? Horror films are his obsession, not Bond.
Yeah no kidding. I asked because there was a concept art going around of the watch being a gadget. Looks like some sort of detonator. Was wondering if it was used as a gadget in the final cut as per the concept art...
My response was related to a review that said Q's response to Bond asking what it does is him saying "It tells the time"...
The final paragraph in that review succinctly states the sentiment across all of the reviews.
(Watched CR and QOS beforeit and my opinion hasn't changed on them either. CR sublime, QoS under-rated) Only four more days to go for me to see SP, really looking forward to it now!
I wouldn't say that, I've largely avoided most reviews, but a good portion I've seen have suggested it is overlong.
In that case I'm excited. Im looking forward to something more of a throw back to the Bond of old.
It makes me wonder why they wouldn't have just done what was initially reported: film enough for two movies. They'd already have B25 in the can, for 2016 release.
But even the more negative reviews at least state the film is entertaining ...at least that's my take.
I did not like SF that much, I liked Qos and CR much better. They claim this film isn't on the level SF was at though. Is this coming from a standard audience perspective? How does it look for a die hard classic Bond fan??
The movie looks like it could be Craig's best Bond film and Top 5 Best Bond films.. Maybe it's just me, but from what I have seen I feel like this movie could be really good.
So how does this place in Craig's Bond series so far???
My list is
CR, Qos, SF in order