Rank the actors

1151618202141

Comments

  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    edited August 2015 Posts: 9,020
    @MayDayDiVicenzo

    you are right, sometimes even the biggest fans tend to criticise too much. I'm counting myself to that group. I try not to be too critical about Skyfall, or Craig or DAF but sometimes one can get carried away a little, it's human.
  • MayDayDiVicenzoMayDayDiVicenzo Here and there
    Posts: 5,080
    @MayDayDiVicenzo

    you are right, sometimes even the biggest fans tend to criticise too much. I'm counting myself to that group. I try not to be too critical about Skyfall, or Craig or DAF but sometimes one can get carried away a little, it's human.

    No, I understand not liking a certain actor or film, but disregarding two thirds of the franchise is pretty puzzling.
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    edited August 2015 Posts: 11,139
    I agree. I think it's evidence of having passion for a series one loves but if things aren't to one's liking because you care, you give enough of a damn to point out what's wrong.
    It's a bit like a parent with their child. If your kid messes up, you don't sit there clapping and nodding in approval; you get out that belt and get to whoopin' that ass......out of love.
  • Posts: 232
    @trevanian

    But I'll give Craig another chance, maybe with age and experience he has become a better actor and can now make Bond his own. We'll see.

    I think Craig is (or was) a solid actor, just totally wrong for this role, and helping make it even more wrong with the ways he has pushed things. He was great in ROAD TO PERDITION, but I gotta say, I would have cast pretty much everybody ELSE in that film as Bond before even thinking of Craig. Jude Law, despite the height, and Stanley Tucci I could see as Bond much more easily than this guy. I think Craig is not playing anything like Bond, but playing Edward Woodward's old CALLAN character, filtered through some kind of self-conscious Steve McQueen ego trip. Maybe when he is out from under this he will go back to being a good character actor - a few years out from Bond and Sean was pulling his WIND&LION/MAN WHO WOULD BE KING/ROBIN&MARIAN hat trick, which is a string of artistic successes that for me says actor AND star while not evoking Bond in the slightest.
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    @MayDayDiVicenzo

    you are right, sometimes even the biggest fans tend to criticise too much. I'm counting myself to that group. I try not to be too critical about Skyfall, or Craig or DAF but sometimes one can get carried away a little, it's human.

    No, I understand not liking a certain actor or film, but disregarding two thirds of the franchise is pretty puzzling.

    This is correct of course. If someone doesn't like most of it, he can't say he's a fan of the franchise. Then he just happens to like some of the movies.
  • MayDayDiVicenzoMayDayDiVicenzo Here and there
    Posts: 5,080
    doubleoego wrote: »
    I agree. I think it's evidence of having passion for a series one loves but if things aren't to one's liking because you care, you give enough of a damn to point out what's wrong.
    It's a bit like a parent with their child. If your kid messes up, you don't sit there clapping and nodding in approval; you get out that belt and get to whoopin' that ass......out of love.

    Again, I can understand that notion, but totally disregarding the tenure of four actors, which equates to nearly 34 years, and 15 films and not even accepting the actors as James Bond 007, then I can't help but feel a little confused.
  • Posts: 232
    It's not a matter of playing percentages, it is a matter of what works for you. If I hate Fleming's SPY WHO CAME IN FROM THE COLD, does that take me down to being only a 92% Bond enthusiast? It doesn't take away from my love for Fleming's MOONRAKER or OHMSS in the slightest.

    I can honestly say that except for liking music, art direction and VFX in SPY and MR, I could easily have the Bond films after OHMSS and before TLD wink out of existence and not feel I was missing a thing. Ditto for everything after LTK (though I admit that there are a few minutes at the opera and in Russia in QUANTUM that somehow feel right to me.)

    I"m NOT a fan of any franchise. I happen to love a lot of original STAR TREK, three of the movies, and about half of DEEP SPACE 9. The rest can either exist as background when I'm cooking or not at all, I don't care. But the parts of TREK I do care about I care about passionately and I am extremely knowledgeable about them, because it merits my attention. If you embrace all of it, it seems like you're suspending critical faculties and taking on lemming or sycophant qualities to justify the time you put in, which to me seems confusing or wrongheaded.
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    @trevanian

    as a huge Trekkie I immediately have to know which half of DS9 you happen to love :D
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    doubleoego wrote: »
    I agree. I think it's evidence of having passion for a series one loves but if things aren't to one's liking because you care, you give enough of a damn to point out what's wrong.
    It's a bit like a parent with their child. If your kid messes up, you don't sit there clapping and nodding in approval; you get out that belt and get to whoopin' that ass......out of love.

    Again, I can understand that notion, but totally disregarding the tenure of four actors, which equates to nearly 34 years, and 15 films and not even accepting the actors as James Bond 007, then I can't help but feel a little confused.

    Yeah in that regard that's taking things too far to childish levels. There are things tgat I may not like and some actors who rank low but never would I disregard their contributions and legitimacy.
  • MayDayDiVicenzoMayDayDiVicenzo Here and there
    edited August 2015 Posts: 5,080
    I wasn't aware that Fleming wrote The Spy Who Came in from the Cold.

    Just a final musing of mine- I don't watch or judge Bond films like they are just any other film, and I agree with @Birdleson's mantra in this regard. And I'm not saying it's wrong if you don't, but I think we should. The Bond films are so diverse, they constantly go through formative processes. It's hard to believe that Die Another Day and Casino Royale are part of the same series. The Bond films are fascinating- understanding why the films take the direction that they did allows me to appreciate the films even more- because otherwise, we may not be here today discussing them on a daily basis.

    53 years. That is impressive.


    I have to agree there, @doubleoego

  • Posts: 232
    @trevanian

    as a huge Trekkie I immediately have to know which half of DS9 you happen to love :D
    I'm not interested in the spotted trills and find most of the aliens to be uninteresting, but love the war arc and the maquis and all the political paranoia of whether your president or wife is a shapeshifter, and the latter espionage intrigue stuff. Also love the 21st century earth where San Fran is a big homeless shelter, the one with Dick Miller, that brings tears to my eyes at one point. DS9 does just so much good dramatically to repudiate the magicbox tech paradise represented on NextGen! Oh, and the one where Sisko thinks he is a 1950s writer dreaming up the idea of DEEP SPACE 9 but not getting to write the story because it has a black Captain. That's phenomenal TV, almost worthy of the amazing stuff we've gotten this century like THE WIRE and CARNIVALE and RIPPER STREET and I'm going to stop here because I'll just keep going on!
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    @trevanian

    you certainly know what's good I agree with everything.
  • Posts: 232
    I wasn't aware that Fleming wrote The Spy Who Came in from the Cold.


    Well, I screwed that up, I meant SPY WHO LOVED ME, obviously.
  • Posts: 232
    trevanian wrote: »
    It's not a matter of playing percentages, it is a matter of what works for you. If I hate Fleming's SPY WHO LOVED ME edited that, had idiotically written SPY WHO CAME IN FROM THE COLD , does that take me down to being only a 92% Bond enthusiast? It doesn't take away from my love for Fleming's MOONRAKER or OHMSS in the slightest.

    I can honestly say that except for liking music, art direction and VFX in SPY and MR, I could easily have the Bond films after OHMSS and before TLD wink out of existence and not feel I was missing a thing. Ditto for everything after LTK (though I admit that there are a few minutes at the opera and in Russia in QUANTUM that somehow feel right to me.)

    I"m NOT a fan of any franchise. I happen to love a lot of original STAR TREK, three of the movies, and about half of DEEP SPACE 9. The rest can either exist as background when I'm cooking or not at all, I don't care. But the parts of TREK I do care about I care about passionately and I am extremely knowledgeable about them, because it merits my attention. If you embrace all of it, it seems like you're suspending critical faculties and taking on lemming or sycophant qualities to justify the time you put in, which to me seems confusing or wrongheaded.

  • 1) Moore
    2) Craig
    3) Dalton
    4) Connery
    5) Brosnan
    6) Lazenby

    It's really hard to pick one out of Dalton and Craig...
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,827
    Well, I love Dalton, Connery & Brosnan, while I only love Craig, Lazenby & Moore...
  • chrisisall wrote: »
    Well, I love Dalton, Connery & Brosnan, while I only love Craig, Lazenby & Moore...
    I know the feeling...

  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,827
    chrisisall wrote: »
    Well, I love Dalton, Connery & Brosnan, while I only love Craig, Lazenby & Moore...
    I know the feeling...
    Being a Bond fan is so... complicated that way for us, eh? :))
  • SzonanaSzonana Mexico
    edited August 2015 Posts: 1,130
    1 Sean Connery and Pierce Brosnan: Both Had everything you could ask for in a great James Bond : they excelled in looks, sex appeal, charm, sophistication, sense of Humor and even though its not their greatest strengh we can say they can defend themselves in the action department very well.

    2 timothy Dalton : Excelled in Action, Physicality, being a Ruthless Killer and was very close Fleming's Bond. Now he can also make a good case for Looks, sex appeal and Charm but fails in sense of Humor.

    3 Daniel Craig like Dalton excelled in all the darker areas of James Bond but failed in the lighter ones like sex appeal, charm, Suavness, sophistication and definitley in sense of humor.

    4 Roger Moore: Great in sense of Humor and Charm but didnt convince me in any of the other areas.


    5 George Lazenby: Definitley he made Bond much more kinder, sensitive and human. He was obviously Charming and was heartbreaking in his final scene but in the action department wasn't very belivable and his Bond, James Bond is the worst.


    Note: i did like all of them since each one of them brought something special to the character or at least have something you can appreciate from their respective performances.
  • JohnHammond73JohnHammond73 Lancashire, UK
    edited August 2015 Posts: 4,151
    This is difficult, do I rank on performance or my favourites? They'd both be different. So, here goes......

    Performance ranking.

    Connery
    Craig
    Brosnan
    Moore
    Dalton
    Lazenby (But mainly because only doing one movie - his final scene was excellent)

    Favourite ranking

    Moore
    Connery
    Craig
    Dalton
    Brosnan
    Lazenby (again, just as it's one movie - but OHMSS is always ranked near the top of my list)


  • SzonanaSzonana Mexico
    Posts: 1,130
    BAIN123 wrote: »
    1. Connery The classic, definitive Bond who set the standard for the others who followed him on screen. Ruthless, cold, a keen gambler and an avid womaniser. Pretty much all of what James Bond is meant to be.<br />
    <br />
    2. Brosnan: A great, all round interpretation of the character. He effortlessly combines wit, elegance, humanity and danger and refined all the best qualities of those before him. Shows flashes of weakness (cemetery scene in Goldeneye) as well as brutal coldness (executing Electra King), yet all the while keeps Bond cool. Plus he was in the first Bond film I watched and, whilst not quite "the best", has always been a personal favourite of mine. <br />
    <br />
    3. Dalton: Often overlooked but his contribution cannot be ignored as he restored the franchise to serious, more grown-up thrillers. However he arguably lacked the joie de vivre quality the previous two posessed and could have maybe used a bit more humour. <br />
    <br />
    4. Moore: Probably the most amusing 007 to date. Admittedly his lighter, more humorous approach is the furthest removed from the source material; however there is a solid sense of typically English charm present, plus the unmistakeable glint in his eye. <br />
    <br />
    5. Craig: Ditto the points for Dalton. Certainly convinces in the fight scenes and occasionally demonstrates charm. However, looks-wise he is the least Bond-like.<br />
    <br />
    6. Lazenby: By no means as bad as it has been suggested. The final scene of OHMSS remains the most poignant ending in Bond history due to his performance. However he is still undeniably overshadowed by the other actors.<br />
    <br />
    Note: Moore and Dalton sometimes change positions.


    Ok i loved your Ranking very much and your comments but what i find it a little strange that After Dalton you have Roger Moore.
    The most common thing is having the similars together so for me its like how can someone jump from ruthless killer Bond to the lightest ?



  • Posts: 11,189
    My rank has changed quite a lot from when I made that list. I now have both Craig and Moore above Dalton and Brosnan lower down.

    I think when Moore got it right, he did well.
  • SzonanaSzonana Mexico
    Posts: 1,130
    BAIN123 wrote: »
    My rank has changed quite a lot from when I made that list. I now have both Craig and Moore above Dalton and Brosnan lower down.

    I think when Moore got it right, he did well.


    That's quite sad.
    I loved that ranking but at the end its your preference and many people changes their minds.


  • Posts: 11,189
    I confess to finding it quite hard to put Brosnan lower down as, presumably like you, he was the 007 I grew up with.
  • Posts: 11,189
    My rank is now:

    Connery
    Craig
    Moore
    Dalton
    Brosnan
    Lazenby
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    edited August 2015 Posts: 9,020
    If I look strictly at acting performances my ranking differs from my "favourite actor" ranking.

    Performances:
    1. Connery (a no-brainer, he's even a great actor)
    2. Dalton (in the same league as Patrick Stewart or other actors that have a Theatre background)
    3. Brosnan (is convincing no matter if he does comedy, hard-edged action, thriller, drama)
    4. Moore (has his unique style that is always the same in every movie)
    5. Craig (is always the same no matter what movie he appears)
    6. Lazenby (well...)

    My favourite Bond actors:

    1. Dalton (the only one for me that got Fleming's vision spot on)
    2. Brosnan (the perfect mix of his predecessors)
    3. Moore (his unique style is brilliant and worked so well for 7 movies)
    4. Connery (the legend of course, but personally I think he was great in 4 movies and then went downhill fast)
    5. Craig/Lazenby (a tie) OHMSS is too good to have Lazenby last, but after Spectre it will happen and Craig will be No 5 on his own.

    All 6 actors have done a marvelous job and if you look at my Top 6 Bond list (which is certain to never change (except if a new one comes along that cracks it) you'll see it contains 6 different Bond actors.

    1. Goldeneye
    2. The Living Daylights
    3. OHMSS
    4. Casino Royale
    5. Octopussy
    6. From Russia With Love
  • SzonanaSzonana Mexico
    Posts: 1,130
    BAIN123 wrote: »
    I confess to finding it quite hard to put Brosnan lower down as, presumably like you, he was the 007 I grew up with.

    I also grew up witn Pierce and thats part of why he is my favorite along with Sean Connery.
    But still good new ranking which i just checked up.

  • Posts: 11,425
    BAIN123 wrote: »
    My rank has changed quite a lot from when I made that list. I now have both Craig and Moore above Dalton and Brosnan lower down.

    I think when Moore got it right, he did well.

    Hooray! Great to see more love for the Roginator.

    People sneer at Sir Rog for being camp and silly as Bond, but I seriously think an appreciation for Roger Moore is something you mature into as you get older. If you don't 'get' Sir Rog, then I'd argue you don't 'get' film Bond.

    Sit back with a martini and Learn from the master.
  • edited August 2015 Posts: 11,189
    I've said this before but Rog is the most "hit and miss" Bond for me.

    When he's good he can be very good. Worldly wise, smart and charming when he has to be - good qualities for Bond. He also did a lot for the series in keeping it going long after Connery had left.

    However, in films like MR he fails to convince me he's playing anyone other than himself (or the persona he puts on). I see him kissing that woman in the PTS wearing that dodgy purple thing and looking like he's in his mid 50s and I just think "nah". That's not Bond, that's a middle aged man trying to look cool. Same with him and his leather jacket in AVTAK.
  • Last_Rat_StandingLast_Rat_Standing Long Neck Ice Cold Beer Never Broke My Heart
    Posts: 4,600
    1A.Connery
    1B.Craig
    2. Moore
    3. Brosnan
    4. Lazenby
    5. Dalton
Sign In or Register to comment.