It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Someone else at the top of the page was bringing up Alfonso Cuaron, who I could see doing some non-stop tracking shots during action scenes in a Bond film, which would be amazing. Just check out 'Children Of Men' and that'll tell you everything.
Con: There mabey whant to take Daniel T. Dorrance as production designer who disapointed me with Mi3 and also work on Die Hard 5. American.
Easy.
Noooooo. Can you even imagine the amount of CGI he'd bring in. It would a complete and utter disaster.
Hand me the 3D specs!
Actually just watched Children Of Men again this very afternoon. Cuaron would be a fantastic choice and he works a lot in Britain so I think hes a realistic option. Given that B25 is very likely to be DC's last I would like Cuaron to send him out with a bang and then give Nolan a 10 year/3 picture contract to relaunch Blofeld and SPECTRE with a new Bond, hopefully ending with the amnesia from YOLT cliffhanger.
I wouldve loved to have seen what Vaughn might have done with it but after The Secret Service it looks like that boat has probably sailed.
I loved his Girl with the Dragon Tattoo and nearly everything he's done. One of America's great living directors.
Agreed Cuaron would be good. Not only does he work a lot in the UK, he's basically lived in London for the last decade.
Not so sure about Fincher. I was underwhelmed by his TGWTDT and thought Gone Girl was okayish - probably the fault of the underlying material but I thought the film descended into absurdity at the end.
I would however vote for one or the other Gareth:
Gareth Evans re-defined the action film with The Raid, and with The Raid 2 he proved that he can assemble a wonderful ensemble of remarkable faces in addition.
Gareth Edwards proved with Monsters that he can do something with little money, and Godzilla is a film that Spielberg himself wouldn´t have done better.
I´m curious to see how The Secret Service will turn out. Vaughn´s films so far had an irresistible fun factor, but the trailer for TSS reminds me frighteningly of those xXx films.
Vaughn would indeed be great. His Kick Ass films and Kingsman all seem to have the perfect sense of humor the Bond films could use. Match that with a new, young Bond for 26 and I think we'd have a hit. Also, with a not-so-big schedule, they could probably keep him around for 2 or 3.
Christopher Nolan
Sofia Coppola (although she is American)
Alejandro González Iñárritu
Mel Gibson (although American and crazy)
Steve McQueen
Agreed on Fincher or Mann. Both can easily create a masterpiece.....dark, brooding, disturbing. They are the only two I would want for a dialed back thriller like FRWL type movie (which we're 50+ years overdue for, and for which I'm longing for).
In fact, Mann would be the only director I'd want if they were going to film in the US.....he would be absolutely brilliant (no one makes LA look so dangerous). For a cheaper alternative, Dan Gilroy could also perhaps do it if they want to film in the US (I have yet to see Nightcrawler but I have heard it is also fantastic to look at).
I loved Angels and Demons & Rush, so wouldn't mind Ron Howard having a crack at it either
Finally, Hannibal (2001) was visually stunning as well (particularly the trip to Verger's house and the Italian stuff) and suitably chilling, so I'm all for Ridley Scott as well.
Having seen Interstellar, I'm less open to Nolan (see my post/review in the Nolan thread).
I always thought that Christopher Nolan works more or less with the same people both in front and behind the camera. Now Barbara and Michael might feel they'd lose control of the series once Nolan jumps in with all of his usual suspects, but by bringing in Nolan alumni gradually EON my try to create an environment that Nolan is comfortable with? Maybe it's for the post-Craig era.
If that's the case, Nolan might want stick around for more than just one film, just like with Batman. However I'm not a big fan of him bringing Tom Hardy as the new 007.
http://letterboxd.com/followtheblind/film/the-prestige/
TDK does rest very much on an excellent performance from Ledger, which they got.
Personally, I prefer BB. It's pacing is slower & one gets a good read on what makes Bale's Wayne tick. I liked the way they closed (Bale-Wayne's story & motivations) that out with TDKR (I may be one of the few who actually liked this movie it seems).
I just wished they could have completed the story arc of Keaton's Wayne in the same way. His Wayne is very similar to Dalton's Bond for me. A story with such promise cut short way too soon.