What Directors Should Helm A Bond Film?

Daltonforyou

Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »

I just don't really like Nolans style of constant driving rhythm even in dialogue scenes, and crosscutting (though I don't doubt he has skill at it), I prefer old school filmmaking. I want Bond to be able to sit across from M and have a full conversation play out without frantically Cross cutting with whatever they're talking about taking place or switching angles every 3 seconds. It's part of why I just don't think he is right, but sadly is probably who Amazon wants, especially if The Odessey is a success.

Yes please, I want to bring back more of those wider full body shots like this.








If Nolan had to film the Octopussy auction scene, the whole thing would be melancholic close-ups.

Junglist_1985

Please not Nolan! His films are chores to rewatch. Impressively made, but sterile.

RichardTheBruce

M_Balje

Look like that both David Heyman and Amy Pascal mabey wil be new producers. She working earlier Sony for Daniel Craig first three Bond movies. She also was producer on the Venom movies, inspecialy i think Venom 2 is interesting because it is a bit QOS of that franchise. Directed by Andy Serkis with amazing good lotr draw scenes. Barbara Broccoli earlier considers to ask Venom 3 directed.

https://www.darkhorizons.com/amazon-sets-heyman-pascal-on-bond-franchise/

Amazon Sets Heyman, Pascal On Bond Franchise?
By Garth FranklinFriday, March 21st 2025 6:38 am

EON, Sony Pictures
Amazon appears to have found the new producers to steer the James Bond franchise now that longtime EON’s Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson have handed over creative control of the franchise to the retai/streaming giant.

Puck News is reporting that producers David Heyman and Amy Pascal are in talks to run the next iteration of James Bond. Heyman has been rumored for weeks for the part and both he and Pascal are said to be currently negotiating their deals.

Officially, Amazon can’t announce anything until the deal between Amazon and EON closes so don’t expect any confirmations yet. The outlet is insistent that, barring a surprise upset, the pair have emerged as the clear frontrunners with top Amazon brass.

Heyman is a British producer who specialises in handling franchises. He’s been a long time producer on the “Harry Potter” and “Paddington” films along with movies like “Barbie,” “Wonka,” “Gravity,” “Testament of Youth” and “I Am Legend”.

Pascal is the LA-born former head of Sony Pictures turned producer and is best known for her producing work on the Tom Holland “Spider-Man”, animated “Spider-Verse” and “Venom” franchises along with films like “Challengers,” “Little Women” and “Molly’s Game”.

When she ran Sony, she oversaw production and distribution of many major films including Daniel Craig’s first three Bond films – “Casino Royale,” “Quantum of Solace” and “Skyfall”.

The site adds the plan is to make a new movie for theatrical release before any spinoffs or TV extensions. Locking in writers and/or a filmmaker will be first and comes before selecting a new Bond.

But as you can read above and if true the deal between Eon and Amazon is not done deal yet, strange because she already said she sold it to them more then a month a go on 20 Feb 2025.

https://www.darkhorizons.com/cuaron-directing-bond-rumors-reignite/

Cuaron Directing Bond Rumors Reignite
By Garth FranklinSaturday, March 22nd 2025 2:37 pm

MGM, EON, Sony Pictures
One person whose name has been unexpectedly linked to the James Bond franchise in recent times has been Alfonso Cuaron.

The “Children of Men,” “Gravity” and “Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban” director hasn’t helmed a film since “Roma” in 2018, though did direct the limited series “Disclaimer” last year that sadly failed to make much impact.

In December last year, he revealed he turned down a serious offer to direct a James Bond film which seemed likely to be “Quantum of Solace” going by the details he shared. Cuaron ultimately did have a small voice role in that film.

Then two weeks ago, shortly after Amazon took creative control of the franchise, a report emerged indicating Cuaron may direct the next film if producer David Heyman became attached to the franchise.

This week came the news that Heyman and Amy Pascal have emerged as the likely producers to take the reins of the films, and now Matt Belloni has said on The Town podcast that he’s heard Cuaron could well be directing the film.

In fact, he indicates Cuaron has already met with mazon and has a new ‘take’ for how the next one could work. It comes on the heels of a report that writers have already been hired for the project.

If true, it all strongly suggests Amazon isn’t going to wait around to get going on the film – so no waiting around another 18 months to two years for Chris Nolan to finish “The Odyssey”.

Risico007

If it hasnt closed yet maybe there is a 1% chance EON can come back

Hey i will take any glimar of hope

Pierce2Daniel

I think that if Matt Belloni is saying that Cuaron had a meeting and a 'take' on the character, then it's basically happening. Though he is very cautious to place a big asterisk next to his claim:

https://www.instagram.com/ringer/reel/DHfHBTORLLU/

Nonetheless, given they are far down the road with hiring producers and talking to directors, I think Amazon want to move very quickly on this. Alfonso Cuarón is a phenomenal choice for 007. His technical skill and visual storytelling are A+, and he’s exactly the kind of director who could elevate the Bond franchise the way Mendes did with Skyfall. The guy has an incredible grasp of big-budget filmmaking—just look at Children of Men and Gravity.

That’s why I was baffled when he did Disclaimer on Apple TV. I watched it, and honestly, it felt like a 90-minute potboiler stretched into 8 episodes. The story was thin, and his signature cinematic style felt wasted on the mundane London setting. It was like getting Lewis Hamilton to drive a Nissan Micra around the track—just not the right fit for someone of his caliber. The whole thing had the same drab, overextended feel as a forgettable Netflix drama.

But if he’s finally stepping back into the world of high-stakes, big-budget filmmaking, and he's using his cachet to take on Bond? Bring it on! He should be doing what Denis Villeneuve is doing with Dune, or what Mendes pulled off with 1917—not just bland prestige TV. If this happens, we could be in for something special.

Also, he might bring Emmanuel Lubezki to shoot! Even though I thought his last film, Amsterdam, looked washed out. His visuals are poetic:

cooperman2

Not a fan of Cuaron for Bond. I haven't seen anything in his work that suggests he would a good fit for an action adventure film. The most worrying part of the world of reel article is that apparently Cuaron has new "take" on Bond. I don't want a new take on Bond I just want a proper Bond film. We've had "new" takes on Bond for the last twenty years, time now for a good old fashioned adventure film.

ArapahoeBondFan

I'm curious as to what the 'new take' is...I hope not something off the deep end.

Daltonforyou

Kenneth Branagh would be excellent as well. Jack Ryan, Belfast and his Shakespeare work are all top notch.

talos7

They have to look beyond the “ prestige “ candidates; the right director may be a more “ working class “ individual.

007HallY

I think there’s a difference between a director who’s creative, reliable, and established, but perhaps works in different genres/makes different types of films each time they direct, and one that’s simply more run of the mill. Truth be told I’m not even sure there’s always a huge difference between certain ‘workman-like’ and ‘auteur’ directors in practice. Ultimately though I think it’s fair to expect a Bond director to have signs in their filmographies that they’re capable of making well crafted films that are regarded well.

MakeshiftPython

cooperman2 wrote: »

Not a fan of Cuaron for Bond. I haven't seen anything in his work that suggests he would a good fit for an action adventure film. The most worrying part of the world of reel article is that apparently Cuaron has new "take" on Bond. I don't want a new take on Bond I just want a proper Bond film. We've had "new" takes on Bond for the last twenty years, time now for a good old fashioned adventure film.

What exactly would a “proper Bond film” even be at this point when accounting for the last 60 years? Because Bond films have never been homogenous. I don’t think any Bond actor sans Lazenby has had a run of films that were stylistically and totally consistent all across.

New takes are just inevitable due to the fact that new filmmakers get hired and give their own interpretation, and that’s before you factor in on what the actors do with the part. This has happened ever since Guy Hamilton replaced Terence Young. Even when Martin Campbell came back for Craig’s debut he took a different approach from what he did in GE, and would likely have yet another new approach if he were to do BOND 26.

SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷

MakeshiftPython wrote: »

cooperman2 wrote: »

Not a fan of Cuaron for Bond. I haven't seen anything in his work that suggests he would a good fit for an action adventure film. The most worrying part of the world of reel article is that apparently Cuaron has new "take" on Bond. I don't want a new take on Bond I just want a proper Bond film. We've had "new" takes on Bond for the last twenty years, time now for a good old fashioned adventure film.

What exactly would a “proper Bond film” even be at this point when accounting for the last 60 years? Because Bond films have never been homogenous. I don’t think any Bond actor sans Lazenby has had a run of films that were stylistically and totally consistent all across.

New takes are just inevitable due to the fact that new filmmakers get hired and give their own interpretation, and that’s before you factor in on what the actors do with the part. This has happened ever since Guy Hamilton replaced Terence Young. Even when Martin Campbell came back for Craig’s debut he took a different approach from what he did in GE, and would likely have yet another new approach if he were to do BOND 26.

This is so true. Well put.