It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Isn't it obvious that my statement was satirical?
Why is that trolling?
Sometimes it's really, really hard to tell.
Hillary is dangerous, so is Trump, both for different reasons.
It's like choosing between getting stoned to death or burned alive.
This is the reason why people get divided, the same happened with the Brexit, one side was unable to accept the other side's opinion.
What I mean Jason is that so many people have had such cartoonish and nonsensical opinions on this election that it is genuinely hard to tell when people are being seriously or just pulling legs at this point.
Both candidates are walking self parodies themselves from time to time, and don't make it hard for people to take the piss out of them.
Doesn't surprise me at all.
The people voting to leave the EU also had no bloody idea what they were even doing, a similar parallel to our situation now with Trump.
You may have missed my Dylan posting from a few days back. "Everybody must get stoned."
Here's the song....
The problem with both these situations is that if you voice concern over immigration (a key factor in both scenarios) you're by default a bigot and a racist. If you're constantly told this you're going to snap - it's a bit like poking a dog with a stick.
Politics is massively stretched these days, if people were a little more centrist we'd be in a much better situation, but the subtleties that come with being centrist are lost in a world where everything has to be a soundbite or condensed into 140 characters. It's left or right. My personal opinion is that those on the far left are far more narcissistic and self-aggrandising than they believe their counterparts on the right to be.
@RC7, both situations also involve sects of the respective populations banding together for any kind of change, no matter what that change is, after they feel dismissed and forgotten by their governments. It's change for change's sake, and not much more, and that's only part of why it's dangerous and/or reckless.
As for left vs. right, we only stymie our development with bipartisan politics. It's either one of the other, nothing more, and this leads to massive divisiveness when it actually comes time to create laws or fix existing ones. It's why Congress majority refuse to play ball with the Democrats on anything and everything. In American politics we even have people called "whips" whose sole jobs involve making sure everyone votes inside the party and against the other on every issue, which explains it all, really. I don't know if you have an equivalent on the other side of the pond, but it wouldn't surprise me, since so much of what we have is derivative of English politics.
7 from 4 different political parties.
They are forced to work together and compromise.
It's just that I can see a political tide turning, a revolution leaning towards the right - more divisive, more insular, calls for more separation, a two fingers up to the political elite, a revolt against the establishment - which seems to be the fallout from years of shitty global policies - the wars in Iraq, the lies, the financial crash and no repercussions for the bankers who took us there, uncontrolled immigration, etc.
Parts of the media in the States and over here in Europe are treating Trump and his supporters with the same contempt that has been dealt out to the people who voted Leave in the EU referendum - dumb, racist, ignorant. It's the same pattern emerging all over again.
What you will discover next week is another shock outcome, and from this moment on the polls will never be trusted again. They predicted the UK General Election completely wrong, and they got it wrong with Brexit too. I have a feeling they will get it badly wrong next Tuesday too, and the fallout will be poured over and analysed for years.
How didn't the political elite, the establishment not see it coming? How could the US be so stupid to vote this man in power? How could they turn against Hillary, who's had an army of celebs supporting her?
Whether we like it or not, change, and BIG change, is happening all around us, and the media and established elite are having a hard time keeping up with it, and coming to terms with it.
Which is why I think that my congressman left Washington and has come back to be the Governor of the state.
What I find equally appalling is how Trump bends to the far Right wack jobs, those under educated inbred jackasses. Those represent a minority in the American electorate so why does the GOP bend over and spread their cheeks for old Verne and Jethro? ZZ top wannabees? huh?
Shouldn't they try and lead them and educate them.?
Heck during the Civil Rights movement of the sixties, it took Lyndon Johnson an old redneck former segregationist since the 1930's to just look at his "Good ole boys" and say, "its time to change". Johnson had no qualms about rolling up his sleeves and twisting arms and breaking kneecaps to get it done. I have always said that I think it was tougher for him to push Civil Rights legislation in the 60's than it was for Obama to get decent healthcare today. ( LBJ got it done. So WTF is Health Care still shit here? )
American needs more leaders like LBJ and Harry Truman instead of these corporate hacks and war mongers (Clinton) and the immature total buffoons (Trump) running for office.
Good point, @chrisisall. Very true.
So now I want to move to Switzerland (ok, especially because of the chocolate and because I love Audrey Hepburn...). What is their immigration policy, Jason? :)
@RC7, seriously, just because people have concerns about immigration there should not be a knee jerk reaction to equating that to being bigoted; no. I agree with you on that. The vocal racists who then tend to pop up and swamp those discussions (not here, but what I see elsewhere on line) get too much attention. Immigration, like education or national defense, are important and always need improving (which means thoughtful discourse and reasoned, intelligent decisions.
I would never vote for an openly bigoted candidate who encourages more bigotry and winks at violence, which Trump does. And again, that is only one key point against him; but it is not a small one. Also, his plans (vague as they are) are very unrealistic.
Clinton is a career politician, been scrutinized for more than 20 years - and even with her faults (which you can argue about the rest of your life, go right ahead) she is overwhelmingly the better choice this election. No doubt about that.
We only have these 2 choices, folks. We may get to the point where we become a 3rd party system. I think I would welcome that. But our current set up is not changing much any time soon.
By all means, we should work to improve our political system, get better candidates, etc. But we have to get through this election first. Then keep going.
Exactly. It's flabbergasting we can't seem to have this discussion.
LBJ was the combination of a Trump and Clinton, though. He fought Vietnam with no actionable intelligence or common sense, putting over 50 million to death and changing history (negatively forever), solved Civil Rights issues only because he wanted to appeal to the masses favorably and in between all this he snaked and bribed his way through his administration in who knows how many instances. To cap it off, his character was as piggish and classless as you could get. This is a man who would randomly whip his penis out to aides and ask them if they'd ever seen one as long as his before.
The only thing he was immaculately successful about is pissing on Kennedy's legacy. Beyond that, he remains one of the most destructive and poor commanders in chief we ever, ever had, and ever will.
Of course he does, as does Clinton too. They are both equally despicable. I've been watching the US TV coverage and been surprised at the blatant bias that the media gets away with.
CNN is backing Clinton, doesn't report on any of the FBI pending corruption, says she is ahead in all the polls, and looks to damage Trump in any way they can.
Then you flick over to Fox News, and they are doing the exact opposite - Trump ahead, Clinton is corrupt, etc.
We cannot get away with that kind of blatant biased news here in the UK on TV. I always thought we were slightly biased one way or the other, until I started watching these US channels. It's been a real learning curve for me.
Not equally. That's a false equivalency. Ask any of the Republicans who are refusing to support Trump:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/04/opinion/the-banality-of-change.html?ref=opinion&_r=0
As long as we allow political donations, the politicians will work for the donors - doing the bare minimum to gather votes to enact the policies of their donors.
The donors cannot accept that their money does not give them total control over politicians. You see the contempt and anger they show to the voters who are not voting as their media are telling them to.
The same goes for Trump, he is the personified devil in the media's eyes.
For CNN you can't go wrong with Don Lemon or Anderson Cooper, and for Fox Megyn Kelly and Bill O'Reilly have really improved as impartial commentators in my eyes over time. Fox is largely a joke of a network, especially their Fox & Friends news blocks, but there's some good commentators on there if you're looking for them that call it as they see it both ways, left or right.
Sometimes I turn on Hannity just to have a laugh at his expense, as you need the cartoon character commentators too to balance things out.