It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I'll be surprised if it is. Clinton just needs to take Nevada, which is likely, and the election is hers.
Both Sanders and Trump had views that were at odds with their respective party establishment consensus and orthodoxy prior to them coming along. In Trump's case, it was his immigration stance, security stance and trade stance. Moreover, his entire campaign stance was that of an outsider.
He criticized policy and approach of his competitors and of previous Republican presidents and candidates.
In my view, he is in fact more of a 'third party usurper' to the Republican Party than Sanders is to the Democratic Party.
For what it worth, I think Clinton has it in the bag.
Booze now...
He's competitive in several battlegrounds, and is likely to take Michigan, North Carolina, Ohio and potentially Wisconsin.
This could be an epic upset, but let's see.
Trump's probably won Pennsylvania as well, as she's not doing as well as she should in Philadelphia.
It's interesting how Trump is taking the suburbs in nearly every state and Clinton is taking the major urban centres. This is very similar to Brexit, where Leave took the rural areas and Remain took the city centres.
We will get what we vote for. So if the most people really want change - any kind of change, just change - that is what we will get. Change for changes sake. Dislike of a career politican - oh let's try someone new. Have they really listened to him this past year? They think he doesn't mean what he says or he won't be "allowed" to do the damage he has promised?
People can give plenty of reasons for voting for Trump, and some on here will for sure (and have), but that does not in any way negate his racist, hatred, bigotry or his desire to tear up our Bill of Rights and Constitution. If the country votes mainly to change anyway to him, even though he has shown us what he is, then it is simply shameful and our country will regret it. No way around that.
I'm so with you. I'm so sad right now.
Obama, twice elected our president, our first black president - and the pendulum swings to a candidate now endorsed by the KKK and other alt right groups? Shameful is the right word.
He has been able to hold the suburbs and reduce Democratic margins in the city areas in some states.
It's Trump.
Pendulums swing of course, I get that about politics. But this is not in any way morally right to me.