It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
He shouldn't be anywhere near the Presidency. It's embarrassing. This is real life, not a cartoon.
I've no doubt about that, it just looks very bad. I'm aware the hardcore Trump supporters think the Middle East is a hotbed of uneducated idiots, but they feel the same. Doesn't send out a good message.
What I'm hopeful for is that this Trump candidacy is the culmination of all that nonsense, the final straw that will finally break the system. Yes, it's not a good thing that Trump has become as popular as he has, but he's done so because he's the only one railing against a system that has become oppressive, mostly economically so, to its own people. Hopefully moving forward, the parties will see that they actually have to listen to the people outside of Wall Street and big business and work for all of us, if for no other reason than nothing like this election ever happens again.
That place is currently undergoing a messy transition from long term dictators to 'who knows what' at this point (new dictators in some countries, ISIL in other countries, muslim brotherhood yet elsewhere etc. etc.). It will be very messy for a very long time, because too many big powers have interests there.
It's a shame that Bernie probably won't beat Hilary now. Bernie vs Trump would've made a much more exciting match up, not to mention BS is the better candidate.
I think Trump will crush Hilary simply by repeating over and over the fact that she received donations and he is self funded. Plus he is the type of strong leader America is looking for, he can do no wrong with the American people.
Tomorrow's news today...
Likely. If it happens I expect you to bite the bullet and and flick the nuclear switch.
Considering it myself. If I can get a gig writing Thunderbirds!
Both Clinton and Trump feature over 50% unfavorable rating. Of the latest 10 favorability polls, Hillary Clinton averages a 53.4% unfavorable rating whereas Trump averages out at 56.9% unfavorable. Trump is higher, but it's not that wide of a margin.
Hillary Clinton Favorable Ratings
Donald Trump Favorable Ratings
Looking at the line graphs provided for each candidate, Hillary's unfavorable rating is on the rise while Trump's, over the course of his campaign, has trended slightly downward.
Excuse me? I'm "the American people" as much as anybody else on this board -- and Trump can do no RIGHT as far as I'm concerned! If you really think America is looking "a strong leader" at the expense of all else, then I think you gravely under-estimate the American people.
If it's Bernie, probably none (which is why he might lose), any other of the clowns will bend to the will & whim of the Military Industrial Complex. We will NOT invade Mexico because they are right next door, and would require no significant production of either planes nor drones. More likely the Middle East (AGAIN! The Military Industrial Complex's training ground, shooting range & cash cow). [-(
Trump is probably the most liberal republican. He supports social security, even planned parenthood in some capacity. I think he has a greater chance of capturing independants than someone like Cruz or Rubio.
From the Halls of Montezuma to the shores Of Tripoli? (As Patrick McGoohan reminded us long ago, Six of of one, half-a-dozen of the other...)
Not surprising. Actually Trump is pretty liberal on many social issues. I think people are just looking for someone who will protect the country and fix our economic problems. More of a libertarian philosophy than anything else. I think social issues are pretty low priority for most people though.
So you are going to try to pick apart my arguments based upon a figure of speech? Please!
I never said I hate Muslims. I just hate terrorists who corrupt the Islamic religion the way they do. Unfortunately, it is a fact that most terrorists are extracted from Islam, even though most Muslims are not terrorists.
And to clarify, I get my beliefs that terrorists are sneaking in here through open borders not from right wing media, but from common sense. When the borders are wide open, common sense says that some not so desirable people are going to sneak into this country without being caught. I don't need any right wing media to tell me that.
By the way, I'm sorry that your brother-in-law had to witness that destruction on that day. I truly am happy that you and your brother-in-law were able to survive what turned out to be one of the darkest days in American history.
...which is another reason Trump could very well split the Republican Party irretirevably rather than taking the Top Job. These theoretical independents have no loyalty to the Republican Party, they're just following the current cult of personality, a notoriously fickle beast. The party regulars are not likely to reconcile themselves to him...and it's awful hard to toss aside your own party's machinery and still win an election! Once the rank&file Republicans who've stood by the GOP over the great DemoLib vs. RepubliCon divide realize that they've obligated themselves to support a multiple divorcee who's a casino owner and (one-time?) supporter of abortion...once folks start looking into the number of illegal aliens who've picked up a paycheck from a Trump company (and don't believe even for a moment that none such exist!)...in short, once the game gets real and The Professionals get involved......ah, it's going to be the most remarkably ENTERTAINING political season I've ever seen!
Agreed 100%!
Yeah but one terrorist can kill hundreds of times more people in one incident then people with guns here.
Look, I don't live my life worried about a terrorist attack either. I don't let them dictate my life. However, it stands to reason that a wide open border will attract those types of people, and no one will be able to stop them.
I have no issue with the motives of people that sneak in here trying to make a better life for themselves. They are not the threat when it comes to terrorism, although they will overwhelm our services. But from a violence standpoint, most of them are good people. But again, it only takes a few bad people to ruin a lot of peoples day.
I'm not quite sure what you mean by the borders being wide-open for people with money. Please clarify.
Border security was NEVER an issue for six years under Republican leadership. Even after 9/11, even after Michael Moore, of all people, pointed out lax security along our shores, not a single Republican made a bluster of border control and a better equipped Coast Guard. What happened was the economic downturn in 2007...and then, and only then, were the "illegals" seen as a problem. It was all of a sudden, with the "Muslim" "terrorist/illegal sympathizer" coming on board, that this become a hot-button issue.
Security is increasingly becoming a Western issue though. You will see it more so in Europe with all the migrants etc. and that will follow to N/A as well.