It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
The we disagree. Underestimating cyberhacking is quite reckless and to me also a sign of not willing to properly secure a country.
Cyberattacks are obviously damaging. But these are also the new 'warfare'. Back in the old days, tank divisions did the job. Nowadays China, and to a lesser extend, consistently use hacking as means of espionage...and sometimes even as means to release stuff that can be damaging.
@PanchitoPistoles What do you mean with "Completely Corrupt"? I find that such grotesque remarks, especially if you don't get the facts straight. The Wikileaks indeed showed a lot of the party apparatus and how it uses marketing strategy to favor a certain candidate. IMO a big mistake, but still something completely different from the actual Watergate Scandal. In the end the DNC did not release negative ad campaigns at all with regard to Bernie Sanders. In the end the actual Clinton campaign -which you can also read from the leaks- decided against mentioning of smears like the supposed atheism of Bernie.
On top of that......I prefer how the DNC in the end put Donna Brazile front-center as the new chairwoman in which she issued the most humble apologies to all Bernie supporters for the above. And in the end, the DNC was already moving heavily to the left-side of the Democrats ideology, by adopting a lot of Bernie's ideas in the current, most progressive party platform ever. Thanks to Bernie!
That's a whole lot different on what the GOP did. Ted Cruz -a man with a more evangelical vision on the future of the USA- got booed for asking to vote with conscience. And attempts by the Republican Log-Cabin gays to get more liberal LGBT issues on the GOP-platform, were completely ignored.
Obama is playing into it as well, he just doesn't know it yet. He will.
Ooowh well call it 'meta discussions'. I am very very worried about these things. I already said that Trump will probably win.
If you want to talk cyber security, perhaps we should start with private email servers. I noticed this thread was deadly silent during the revelations.
I don't give a shit. If Trump wins than it's for the most part also the current sentiment in the Western world. Establishment candidates are considered 'traitors', 'losers'. Populism is the new 'law of the land'. If you think Clinton can win easily, then you are wrong. In the end the current political situation on the whole favors Trump, like it favored Obama in 2008. 'Status quo' is a dirty word.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3709042/Latest-poll-claims-Trump-NO-bounce-Cleveland-convention-stuck-Clinton.html
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/poll-no-post-convention-bounce-donald-trump-n616426
https://politicalwire.com/2016/07/26/tracker-shows-no-bounce-for-trump/
"Do you want cheese on that Whopper?" is your peak.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3709042/Latest-poll-claims-Trump-NO-bounce-Cleveland-convention-stuck-Clinton.html
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/poll-no-post-convention-bounce-donald-trump-n616426
https://politicalwire.com/2016/07/26/tracker-shows-no-bounce-for-trump/
Please change your Depends as they just got soiled.
Well if the Daily Mail said it, it must be true! :))
If these are your sources, best just to stick with your pictures in future! =))
I don't think the Dems are focusing on it as much as the media is (and might) as the story unfolds.
To think, the U.S. may elect a President who's in bed with the Russians.
The DNC knew about the leaks months in advance. So the cover up story was set then too.
( That should keep me safe ) ;)
:)) =)) :))
Still no answer :-)
Easier to categorize and label perhaps, and consequently for marketers and politicians to target.
One poll (NBC) suggested no bounce for Trump, while several others disagreed. The only fair way is to take an average of all major polls and examine the average, which is exactly what RCP do.
On the eve of the Republican convention (July 17) the RCP poll average looked like this:
Clinton 43.8 Trump 40.6
Today it is:
Clinton 44.6 Trump 45.7
This morning's LA Times/USC poll even has the eye popping figures of:
Trump 47 Clinton 40
We'll see if others follow. It'll all settle down soon. It's still pinch of salt time. In 1988 Mike Dukakis roared out of his convention with a 55-38 lead over Vice President Bush, and we all know how that turned out.
1. Dick Morris: “This is going to be a landslide. It will bethe biggest surprise in recent American political history.”
2. Roger Kimball: “Oboma is toast .. Romney is going to win, big time.” I
3. Karl Rove: “At least 279 electoral votes.” “It comes down to numbers. And in the final days of this presidential race, from polling data to early voting, they favor Mitt Romney,”
4. Peggy Noonan: “There is no denying the Republicans have the passion now.”
5. Larry Kudlow: “A landslide. Yes, that’s right: 330 electoral votes.”
6. Fred Barnes: “Romney will be elected the 45th president of the United States.”
7. Michael Barone: “Fundamentals usually prevail in American elections.” Barone predicted a 315-223 Romney blowout in which Romney took easy Obama states like Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.
8. Dean Chambers: “The race has shifted profoundly in favor of Mitt Romney.”
9. Newt Gingrich: “A Romney landslide.” . “My personal guess is you’ll see a Romney landslide, 53 percent-plus in the popular vote, 300 electoral votes-plus,”
Thanks, boys. Here's the late great Miss Cleo with a message from beyond.
A glaring omission.
:)
And after all these weeks and months.......I still don't know where you stand when it comes to policy, ideology and solutions. You never speak out about that.
This is not just to...put you in boxes or leave you for dumb. I simply don't understand where you stand for. And it always makes discussing with you very hard.
Moreover, the categorization is very logical IMO, because the elections upcoming November are also black-and-white. In the end you have to weigh all your own personal ideas, and re-allign them with the presidential candidate you stand for. Then you cast your vote.
Unless you don't give a damn about policies, ideas and solutions and only vote for 'the guy you like most'.
Sorry, Poncho. Put your coloring book down and sit with Newt.
@bondjames, Are you even living in America? just curious.
I will MAKE people care for that. Because that's what democracy is about as well! Stating our voting preferences :-).