It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
This is playing out exactly as expected with all the angles in place. They put the bait out there and he took it (and he did it on Stephanopoulos of all places, just like he did on Matthews during the primary). Brave, but also stupid as stupid can be. If he doesn't get more disciplined, he will be beaten very badly this fall.
So simplification is a bad thing so this guy therefore simplifies and it's fair? What this video does is claim the left 'simplify' a discussion, which the person in the video finds appaling. Apparently missing the fact that simplification is a style of comedy. Then he himself generalises all gays (talking about simplification!) and claims they're antagonising Christians on purpose. All of them. And you don't understand how this is seen as an anti gay rant?
Ok, I'll try to explain it:
generalising all gays (1)
Claiming they're purposefully antigonising Christians (2)
makes...?
gays are unfriendly whing people who are trying to get everyone to live their way....
Of course he doesn't say that last bit because then everybody would understand it was actually all anti gay in the first place...
Another thing: you, personally, have claimed before that all gays were wild party animals. Then, when @Gustav told you he actually is gay and not much of a party animal, you called him an exception because you imagined all gays were like that.
Nope, sure gays don't want to get married, for they fight for things they actually don't want. That's why this has been an issue all that time.
Now if I'd ended that last line with 'they only do it to antagonise Christians', would you actually have thought I had a point?
The man in the video has every right to present his views in the public forum. Nobody has suggested otherwise. Likewise, those with a dissenting view, or those that find his views and/or presentation of those views to be extremely lacking have the exact same right to speak out against it.
Free speech is another one of those areas where people try to twist things around in the interest of defending themselves while engaging in political discourse. Freedom of speech, at least in terms of the American system (since we are discussing an American election) is only designed to protect the speaker from legal action from the government. The government cannot jail you for speaking. That does not extend to the private sector, as speech is not protected from criticism, only from legal action by the government.
If we can't look at satire for what it is, then we're going down a slippery slope where freedom of speech is indeed in question.
Nope, just moderating the boards. It's what we do.
Totally despicable :(
While it's not a scientific poll that features a margin of error, a poll was conducted of the military, their families, and retired personnel. Gary Johnson actually leads all presidential candidates with 38.7% of the vote. Trump trails him with 31.4%.
As you said, one has to wonder if this will hurt Trump and, if it does, where do those voters go? Johnson or Clinton (who trailed both Johnson and Trump with 15.3%)?
You can downplay the neocons and the MIC all you want, but they are supporting Hillary, not Trump. That speaks volumes to me. Besides, Trump is just a clown who uses every opportunity he has to make a fool of himself, and discourage people from voting for him.
Hillary Clinton in the White House means further tensions with Russia, and I'm afraid the cold war could become a hot war. And that is much, much worse than a conservative SCOTUS judge.
Since Hillary will become the president, remember this when the s**t hits the fan.
Brutal, yes. Takedown, no.
The only dummy here, was McInness. And I knew I was dealing with a moron when he brought welfare into the argument, in reaction to Maher...WHO NEVER MENTIONED WELFARE!!!!
Give me a break on this "antagonizing Christians." IMHO, they need to be antagonized, continuously, for a BS belief system that has effed up the human race.
Because the right doesn't do this? In actuality, Mcinness exposes himself as completely incoherent. This is why the Left wins in the media, in the classroom, in the sciences. because they understand following a course of reasoning. This idiot, in the process of trying to argue against Maher, brings up topics (welfare and gay weddings at churches) that, at least ion the clip he is showing here, NEVER ADDRESSED!!! LMFAO!
Arguing with conservatives is fun because I like watching their brains get in a pretzel because their own logic tends to come right back on them. They get confused. They are accustomed to making a video (like this) or sitting behind a mic and not being challenged. And then when they are, they can't deal with it.
So we should vote for Trump because he's in bed with the Russians?
Regardless of who else was going to be President, there were going to be (and will always be) tensions with Putin. I am not sure how that is a sound argument against HRC. Seriously.
Well, I wasn't arguing you, personally...just the video you presented.
Still, I got complaints. My speech is inappropriate. Why not just attack me for fun?
Adding childishness to your list of unsympathetic displays in this thread?
@Benny and @NicNac speak a language the rest of us, members, understand. It's called forum decency. As usual, conflicting opinions, especially on a political subject, cannot be resolved. Smart people give it a rest after a while, troublemakers keep going. We're watching you and we're watching everybody, twice as closely in a political thread. Because the rules are simple; when our forum peace is threatened, troublemakers are reprimanded once before we ban them. Doesn't matter who started it or who's guilty of what. We're not going to allow this forum reach civil war, and certainly not over that loopy carnival called American politics.
See, we're taking lessons from Trump. We don't need proof of something; if we don't like you, if your name sounds a bit funny to us, we can brand you a troublemaker and push you outside the walls of these forums. By the way, getting rid of troublemakers is enough to solve ALL of our troubles. Every Redneck understands that. Mods can say whatever they want; we can say something now and something else entirely tomorrow. Doesn't matter. We'll just write a juicy hate speech and fat Luda May, boozehound Bufford and toothless Morty will give us an applause. So you see, we're basically class-A fascists here but hey, the majority of our members is cheering for us so that's good enough.
Seriously though, if a mod asks you to play by the rules, laid out by the hosts of this forum, you respectfully agree or you find yourself another forum. It's called politeness.
Believe me, you have no idea. Condemn me if you like, I understand. Talk about unsympathetic, you still have no idea what's going on right now.
Great post @DarthDimi. I would also add that if you are a forum troublemaker, you look more imbecilic than ever when you spend all your time spewing disparaging words upon others in your posts, then, when someone calmly tells you to cool it, you act the victim of oppression and try to convince us all to throw a pity party for you, pretending you haven't been a bellend since the day you joined. That's the most pathetic response I've seen thus far.
Never a truer word spoken. I also don't like the fact that you left out my name. He's talking about me, everybody!
If one cannot be civil, one should find site where such behaviour is considered appropriate (or at least tolerated). I like this place civil.
and
and @chrisisall
You know, I wouldn't believe you if you weren't a venusaur. ~O)
I guess Trump knew what he was talking about when he made his "5th Avenue" comment, judging from the first link. ;)
:))