It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
*snif*
No, I didn't say you should vote for Trump. All I was trying to say is what the future will be like with Hillary in the office. Unless a miracle happens, she will be the president. She was handpicked for the job.
You highlighted the first part of my sentence, and the point I was trying to make is in the second part. At this point, any further tensions with Russia could lead to an open war. I seriously believe that's possible.
And what does "in bed with the Russians" exactly mean? If it means improving relations between the two countries, then I wholeheartedly support that.
Now to the business at hand... let's get Hillary elected.
I wasn't exactly talking about that, but never mind. I'll leave it there.
You are right about one thing, though - nothing new there.
I get that. But are you suggesting that with Hillary as President, that will cause tensions with Russia? The recent DNC and HRC campaign hacks suggest to me that Russia is threatened by her. How and why, I don't know. But if Russia is backing Trump, then that suggests we, as a nation, need to run from him even more. Given that HRC is a female, that could make relations with Russia even more difficult--I can see that. But Russia is in no economic shape to be going to war with the U.S. And they know it.
Oh man, I'm crying I'm laughing so hard... =))
Utah:
--> 36%: Hillary Clinton
--> 35%: Donald Trump
http://kutv.com/news/local/utah-could-vote-democrat-for-president-for-first-time-in-50-years
Missouri:
--> 41%: Hillary Clinton
--> 40%: Donald Trump
http://www.politicususa.com/2016/07/29/democrats-surging-hillary-clinton-takes-lead-trump-red-state-missouri.html
Georgia:
--> 45%: Donald Trump
--> 45%: Hillary Clinton
http://www.wsbtv.com/news/politics/clinton-trump-deadlocked-in-latest-georgia-poll/415167092?ecmp=wsbtv_social_twitter_sfp
Georgia went blue last time in 1992 when Bill Clinton carried the state. Missouri was blue last time in 1996 when Bill Clinton carried Missouri for the 2nd time. But Utah...that's a different thing. That state went blue for the last time in 1964 after Lyndon. B. Johnson carried it.
This is actually not so good news for Donald Trump, as his campaign is merely focused on three traditional working-class, blue-collar states, Wisconsin, Ohio and Pennsylvania, and the state of Florida. Should the Trump campaign start put some campaign resources in Missouri, Utah and Georgia?
I thought that that was Chicago?
Probably.
There is a town called Intercourse in Pennsylvania, ;)
Clueless as usual.
No. He should concentrate on Florida, Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Ohio. No one gives a rat's ass about Utah and Missouri. His campaign is woefully inadequate with regards to the micro-targeting approach of Hillary.
Nice to know some things never change. Cue Dan Hicks once again...
He's a politically and geographic challenged person who is lost.
"I Scare Myself" and "Where's the Money?." After this, I'll go back to promoting the Presidential campaign of "The Cat in the Hat."
http://politicalblindspot.com/the-food-stamp-capital-of-the-u-s-is-white-and-republican/
Keep the gun lobby happy too. :P
And now also a new poll stating that Arizona becomes a firm battleground state. Difference with Utah, Missouri and Georgia though, is that the Clinton campaign is doing big grass-roots efforts in the state that borders Trump's 'future big wall':
Arizona:
--> 45%: Hillary Clinton
--> 42%: Donald Trump
http://email.connectstrategic.com/t/j-34549BEAED04456D
Arizona went Democratic for the last time back in 1996, when Bill Clinton won his 2nd term.
You forget an important thing here. Those people are not Republican. They are voting for 'Trumpism', they are 'Trumpites'. It's the same thing we saw in the UK during Brexit. Angry, poor, non-educated whites didn't vote for Cameron's Tories, they did vote for the anger that the UKIP verbalized so masterfully, and to a lesser extend the 'Johnsonites'. It's only because of the lack of a multi-party system that we fail to see how, especially, establishment parties on the right are eaten alive from the inside out.
That's why for instance in my country, The Netherlands, having a multi-party system, the classic Conservative Parties (CDA, Christian Democrats and VVD, Conservative Liberals), have lost ground massively to Geert Wilders' PVV (Party Of Freedom). Especially the CDA was in The Netherlands the 'big one'. They delivered long-serving Prime Ministers and were the largest political force in The Netherlands for decades. But after 2006....CDA was eaten alive and is now only a marginal opposition party.