It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
That difference would have made a difference in a sequel movie, even EON plays with the strong parts of their actors. QoS might have been similar but be different.
I like Daniel Craig as 007 but I find that his 007 movies have been not all that it could be. The sinking house sequence at the end of CR I would have gladly seen changed for something less spectacular that would have required is acting skills it could have given OHMSS ending a run for their money instead of going for spectacle. QoS is in my humble opinion the best reason to keep the franchise out of the directing hands of artyfarty folks and the editing made an even bigger mess. I sincerely hope that with Bond 23 Craig gets a decent outing otherwise he'll end up being the biggest promise with the least result. ANd that would be a waste of Daniel Craig.