It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
:))
:D
I agree, there is wasted potential there for sure. But we might still get something like that in NTTD.
I hope we do. Its a very interesting dynamic and not one that has been over done in film. Sibling rivalry and childhood jealousy is something that people carry with them.
I still think they had some good ideas about it in the beginning, how to approach it, but it got lost in the endless rewrites and the production.
I remember Daniel saying he was against the idea initially, but was convinced in the end because it was too good not to do, but we can't even tell what this good idea was because it's nowhere on the screen. The Brofeld-Bond relationship has zero depth or purpose.
Agree with you about AB. Very good film. Great cast.
I remember seeing Road to Perdition at the cinema and being totally underwhelmed. Amazing cast but it just feels all so ponderous and heavy. Never lifts off the runway.
I enjoyed Away We Go but it's pretty light weight romcom fluff tbh.
Yep, AB is his first and best film and can't see him ever topping it.
Also, terrific new interview where he speaks a lot about Bond and 1917:
Lewis Gilbert had a CBE and Michal Apted has a CMG.
Mendes was previously awarded a CBE, but he has become the first Bond director to earn a Knighthood.
You would have thought all the Prince Andrew stuff would have shaken our faith in these naff old institutions but I guess not. Good director but disappointed in him personally.
I think it's directly because of Bond. If he hadn't tackled such a legendary British franchise and made a truck ton of money and got good reviews, he'd still be considered a former A-list director making plays and floated pretentious movies.
American Beauty put him on the map, but the Bond franchise made Sam Mendes.
Though, had Mendes failed with SF he would have been back to making under-seen films and held his B-list director status. So we should be thankfully he cared so much when making SF to make one of the best Bond films. (Less so with SP)
;)
;)
During his presentation and Q&A, we had the chance to watch a rough cut of "American Beauty" with some deleted scenes of the movie. A very cool experience.
Very cool!
I believe Anwar was actually Skyfall's original editor:
https://www.mi6-hq.com/news/index.php?itemid=9535
I suspect that Mendes didn't get his way as Anwar is known for art-y dramas. Stuart Baird was more of an accomplished action editor. He was definitely an Eon hire. I suppose it was a concession in getting someone like Thomas Newman onboard.
In the wake, of Dan Romer possibly leaving NTTD, this is evidence that not even Sam Mendes got everything he wanted from Eon............................
Mendes winning in directing was a total shock....it's a very auteur-heavy year. He was up against the likes of Scorsese, Tarantino (two filmmakers who you won't get many more opportunities to award) and Bong Joon (Todd Phillips hardly counts).
This pretty much puts Sam and 1917 in the hot seat for the Oscar. How very exciting! This will do wonders for the box office this weekend. I'm definitely going to the cinema to check this out.