It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
-I think Their main holdings are mainly ouside the scope of Brexit; the international connections are compartmentalized separately in each project, it can swiftly be rearanged except for a few things, everything can mostly continue as before.
I don't think they'll look at Brexit in any context other than the UKs continuing ability to provide them with the facilities & expertise to which they have grown accustomed. I'm sure they could have filmed Bond cheaper in many places over the years so perhaps economics in its most naked form isn't the be all & end all of the matter.
I wouldn't be too worried.
Yes, I agree but I don't see either side being powerful enough in time for the next election. UKIP will show big gains because they had 6 million votes last time and still only one seat. This Brexit vote will only embolden and consolidate this force, especially since the conservatives picked a non Brexit leader. Honestly, I feel that if the conservatives had got a hard line brexiter they would have kept everybody happy. Now there will be a split between the rightwing and the centre, just like is happening with labour at the moment.
There seems to be a good team in place now.
I don't really share all the excitement and optimism. It's just the same people moved around to different jobs. What's actually changed?
Same as England getting a new manager. Ok Roy was shit but the new bloke will pick most of the same players and guess what - we won't win the World Cup.
I just feel a change in the air ...... I think we're going to be OK. =D>
It's the only option, being positive, that is. Becoming a gibbering, panic stricken wreck of a nation isn't going to do us any good.
Sounds like a Ron Jeremy film.
No we leave that the EU..... :D
I agree. But not facing reality isn't helpful either. There are already many events in the British economy that are actually quite destructive. There are times you need to face reality, and that reality can't be always positive.
The best thing then is to FIRST face that negative looking reality, and SECONDLY act accordingly in a positive way. Sadly, all I hear now is this ignorance of facing reality.
Gustav please explain how we are not facing reality? Personally I would also love to know the sources from which you draw your opinions.
I could mention that - rather than the British - it is others who have difficulty facing up to or indeed accepting reality.
Well, simple, plain understanding of economics might do. Which, in the wake of Brexit we fail to take for granted. It appalls. This article shows how grim the situation of the UK economy will become in thee next 12 months:
--> http://realmoney.thestreet.com/articles/07/14/2016/brexit-fears-move-u.k.-commercial-property-housing
--> http://www.investing.com/news/economy-news/u.s.-financial-monitor-says-brexit's-effects-could-be-felt-for-years-414473
--> https://www.thestar.com/business/economy/2016/07/08/uk-economy-showing-brexit-effects.html
Quotes like:
--> "bigger falls in capital values and output would clearly have more substantial macroeconomic and financial effects. And a major downturn in the residential market would magnify the effects on wealth and confidence,"
--> "The first data about the residential property market after the Brexit vote comes hot on the heels of news of trouble in the commercial property sector, where a number of funds suspended withdrawals by investors, sparking fears of a crash.",
--> "erosion of households’ spending power" and
--> "The uncertainty around the future of the economy outside the common market would dampen business investment and consumer spending, as investors hold back on hiring and long-term investments and consumers postpone large spending decisions,"
need to be taken more seriously.
Uncertainty is what interests economists and what should interest households, not false positivity. The thing is, with such macro-economic factors, it is hard to counteract it with simple government reform. So I am quite astonished that the new Chancellor of the Exchequer in the UK, Mr Hammond, does not have any plans to create an Emergency Budget next to a more 'normal' Budget. It's reckless, and not a smart start to good finance policies.
How can you possibly say that "By not facing reality...", and in the same post, suggest that we act in a positive manner secondly? If anyone is struggling to face reality, then it's the EU.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/former-fox-news-commentator-sentenced-to-prison-for-faking-cia-ties/ar-BBungxx?li=BBnb7Kz
The big companies and the neo-liberals ALWAYS shout "danger" "job-loss" "we'll go abroad" as soon as anything happens that could lessen their quarterly figures a tenth of a percent.
The UK will become the prime example of how the EU is not needed.
Anyone heard of Switzerland. Have you @Gustav_Graves ?
Do you know why we are so successful GG? Because we didn't join the EU. That's why.
Economists are wrong about everything and always have been. Nothing changes in that regard!
No, it was usual guff said by all new Tory PMs before they get down to the usual business of enriching the City and Big Business and presiding over a recession for the rest of us. Check out what was said by Cameron, Major, Thatcher.
Guarantee in 2 years time she'll be banging on about sacrifices we have to make for good of the country, and by next election telling us not to throw away the sacrifices we've made by electing a Labour govt.