It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
It's not the Shanghai casino scene, it's the Shanghai building scene.
Check out the promo photos of Bond with leather gloves (the very first ones that were out), and compare with the fact he doesn't wear gloves in the movie when he holds the gun when he follows Patrice in the building.
http://www.murdocklondon.com/tmm/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/bond-beard.jpg
So the fact they "forgot" at the beginning of the shooting with the jellyfish set that the gun needed the palm print to work could be true. I've some experience with movie sets, and I've never seen the actors change their clothes for an in-set promo shoot... It's done in the continuity of the shooting. So they might have shot the scenes with gloves, yes.
They shot a little scene of Bond removing his gloves to check Q's gun before entering the building, and it was indeed shot far later, we know that.
Now about the CG replacement of the gloves with a CG hand : well it's IMO possible, but they were lucky this scene happens in the shadows, so it's hard to judge on the movie itself (the face replacement in the fight is more obvious, but it's because there you have light).
But if it's true, then this Shanghai building scene is a very CG scene ! First a 3D Bond under the elevator, then this hand, then the face replacement, then the 3D Patrice, wow :)
Mod edit: please only post links to EON property.
http://img15.hostingpics.net/pics/494135Capture.png
i don't know for sure, but it may be a CG hand indeed. But the lighting is so unusual it's hard to say.
But I've looked at the scene again, and Bond puts back his gloves off screen just before fighting Patrice... and the gloves are needed for the "Bond can't hold Patrice's hand" ending.
Well, for years we've wondered why the Hitchockian Patrice fall in the trailer was turned into a blatant 3D CG in the final movie. This glove/no glove stuff may be true and hint at the fact these scenes were quite a mess in the making ?
Mod edit: please only post links to EON property.
fantastic story.
Chips for gambling, or drinking the old Martini. :D not to mention eating a bag of
Crisps.
Oh.
The Bond on set book has several photos of the casino filming, and Daniel Craig isn't wearing gloves in any of them. (I suppose they CGI'd them out for the book, too, right? :) )
of red boxing gloves on. Anyone else catch that ?
No that was only in the trailer. They later removed them. Cost them millions...
for the free running sequence in CR.
Full clown SUIT you mean, they wanted to pay tribute to Octopussy. They also CGId the Skyfall bit where he arrived at the casino in a remote control alligator.
His wardrobe in that scene is despicable. Luckily the action makes up for it.
Obviously, the author meant to refer to the Shanghai sequence.
On the other hand, if it is an hoax, well you have to admit it turned out to be incredibly lucky it was about something as hard as to spot in SF as the watch knuckle-duster in CR.
Forget Bonds gloves, the T-shirted babe is well hot or that's what my nephew said, I couldn't possibly comment at my age. ;)
I couldn't take my Rising Sun eye off here - seriously watch Collider for movie goss and news but she annoys the hell out of me as she can't say Mutant properly - she misses the first T every time. It really grinds my gears.