It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I don't remember seeing a lot of explosions in the trailer? Maybe Ritchie won't need to have much CGI. The first Sherlock Holmes movie had similar budget
After watching the trailer....well....I'm kind of interested.
I had no idea that Taken 3 had a budget of only $48m. I know that movie has been blasted, but honestly I didn't find it all that bad. I actually enjoyed it, much more than Taken 2. That was a good use of money. I'm sure the return on investment was amazing.
Liam sure worked for peanuts - that's the salary of some actors.
True. I have felt for some time that SP was going to be Craig's TB or TSWLM (i.e. bigger and better, with all the money up on the screen compared to previous outings). I still believe that.
It's probably going to be more glamourous and expensive looking. They have to put all the newbie pretenders out this year firmly in their place. Bond is the #1 dog in this hunt. Eggsy who?
@bondjames Liam Neeson was paid 20 million for Taken 3. Hardly peanuts :P I didn't mind Taken 3 either. I thought the editing in the fight scenes/action scenes was poor but it was a decent enough film. I think it was about as good as Taken 2, which I also enjoyed.
You kidding me no :-O??
Then hopefully a sequel can iron out any deficiencies, and then off we go into another glorious era of Uncle.
I would anticipate modest budget, quality productions.
Keep films well stocked with a plentiful and varied supply of gorgeous Uncle girls, both friendly and fatale.
Combine with healthy dose of spy fantasy, and humour, and generous dose of danger and suspense.
Series should go for 45 years or so, until someone reboots it, and decides Solo suddenly has mryiad trust and purpose issues. ;)
LOL, you're funny :-P. So $550 Million globally? Lower than CR and QOS? Hahaha :D
I think you should do yourself a favor and watch a couple of 1st season episodes of UNCLE just to see the television show that hand in hand created the spy craze of the 60's. After all Ian Fleming had a hand in creating it by naming the lead character "Napoleon Solo". Not knowing UNCLE is like not having ever seen a Connery Bond film.
I agree.
https://uncleepisodeguide.wordpress.com/u-n-c-l-e-s-ties-with-james-bond/
Please, go ahead :)
A proposal for revamping UNCLE creator credits.
https://hmssweblog.wordpress.com/2011/08/23/a-proposal-for-revamping-u-n-c-l-e-creator-credits/
You will be glad to know that it has become hit over there.
Here is a fun article on Spy Style, which you all may enjoy (includes a video) : http://www.mrporter.com/journal/the-report/a-brief-history-of-spy-style/171?cm_mmc=LinkshareUS-_-DruclYqPxnE-_-Custom-_-LinkBuilder&siteID=DruclYqPxnE-nRCkN6i9CxcN3nIeN0Ge2Q