It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
A 57 year old Moore sniffing behind a 27 years his junior Tanya Roberts must have irked many a fan and critic. I once read a nasty review that stated and I quote, "they spent more time filling in the wrinkles in Roger Moore's face than filling in the plot holes."
AVTAK may be a flawed film but it has some good points to recommend it: Christopher Walken is great and a real scene stealer and Grace Jones was quite good. One critic even remarked that they should have killed Stacy and let Bond ride off with May Day. I liked the rest of Zorin's henchmen and women (Alison Doody is a bright star despite the limited screen time. The chase through the streets of San Francisco is full of the typical comedic elements we have grown accustomed to with Moore's Bond but I found the chase quite thrilling. And the climax atop the Golden Gate Bridge is priceless and too often overlooked as one of the great fights/climaxes.
And lets not forget Barry's great score and that "kick in the balls" theme song and Binder's opening credits are up to his usual high standards.
@Brady Really interesting how people seem to knock TB and LTK, both of them make my top ten.
In the case of Licence to Kill, it's such a different yet amazing Bond film. So dark and untamed, with a Bond on edge and off the rails. The tragedy of Felix's severed marriage mirroring Bond's own past tragedy with Tracy and how they are bonded by mutual loss is powerful, and Sanchez is set up as a great villain in a story that is about as adult and gritty as a Bond has got in some areas. It's also got some of my favorite Q moments, a great Bond girl in the form of Pam, and an all-star performance from Dalton that nail's Bond's fiery rage as he finds himself without even M and MI6 to rely on.
My love of Quantum of Solace and Spectre are well documented, and they represent two of my most analyzed and "talked about" Bonds as I try to argue for their merits quite frequently, and I even set up an appreciation thread for the former:
http://www.mi6community.com/index.php?p=/discussion/1117/quantum-of-solace-appreciation-thread-we-found-a-better-place-to-meet
what's wrong with these three movies:
- License To Kill is my absolute fav film of all time, so I don't care what people say at all.
- As much as people love to hate on Diamonds Are Forever being ridiculously silly, I think that was the point of the filmmakers: to do a funny romp in stark contrast to the tragic ending of OHMMS. It's Bond drowning his sorrows in funky casinos and lame (but hilarious, especially the rat sketch, IMHO) jokes. It's outrageously campy and, in a way, I think the public and the critics were looking for that after - unfairly: it's also a fav of mine - panning OHMSS for its alledged seriouness. To sum it up: I'm saying that should DAF have failed, the Bond franchise may (or may not, who knows: it's a just personal opinion after all) have ended by 1975, or even fallen into Kevin McClory's hands. Silliness saved 007. Fandom should take things into perspective in that case.
- Spectre: it's formulaic. Well, that's the point, again. I think Mendes wanted to do an old, classic Bond from the 70s/80s: taking clichés from action films of his era and put 007 into them. It's going back to the times where Bond followed the current trends and was just fun, fun and more fun, adding a lot of references to pander the fandom and integrating the mixture into Craig's era continuity. Of course, it ended up being unoriginal, but, man, this movie is a ton of fun.
Sorry I have to say it gets worse for me on each viewing, only aspect that doesn't get worse is the Thames chase, "007 your time is up" and Zukovsky
Preach it Brother!
People can't see past 15 seconds of bad CGI and a bland finale.
The first 70 minutes of DAD are infinitely better than bloody Skyfall.
It's horrid dialogue more than anything else more me, @BondJasonBond006, the absolute worst in the series with no competition. It's like the writing room handed the job off to five-year-olds so they could go to Cabo and sip some mojitos.
The whole reason why I hate formula is because every second of that movie is a stupid, badly delivered one-liner. It just never, never ends.
Sounds like the script for character Silva :P
A fun Bond romp that does go far in many spots, but I feel is always entertaining. The pace is phenomenal and the locations are beautiful. Yes it does go extremely over the top with the laser battles, but to sit back and watch the special effects is something to marvel over.
From Nassau to the beginning of the underwater battle near the end, it actually is the best hour of Bond in the series.
But the first 45 minutes, sadly, put it almost to the bottom of the Connery-era. I actually think YOLT is better overall.
Is it silly? Maybe. OTT? Possibly. Moore at his best? Definitely.
I think TND is undervalued by many.
I suppose because it does have little in the way of action, explosions, and exotic locations some are bored with it. I'm entertained every time I put it on and it's pretty much my number one Bond.
I have issues with it because Bond doesn't exactly inspire confidence throughout. When he's actually doing anything, that is.
Dr. No and From Russia with Love don't have crazy action, explosions or most of the bells and whistles of what you'd call an action film either, but they are still classics in every way, and near perfect movies.