It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
But I will say this: I agree with the idea of sending Bond back to the Cold War era. It probably should have been done with CR. EON could have/should have beaten Mad Men to the punch on that 50s/60s retro stuff. Problem is, Man from UNCLE has now punched that ticket.
What's to fix ? Silly, stupid video.
Having a different actor each movie is an interesting idea but would be a branding nightmare.
On the train in SP, Bond tells Madeleine that he "never really had a choice" to become a spy. Might this line suggest that MI6 had a file on him for a long time? Is it possible that he was recruited? Is it possible that Hannes Oberhauser was a Spectre leader/agent and that his son took over? And that MI6 knew this? And are the ones who adopted the young Bond boy, placed him in a home, got him an education, and then molded him?
These are terrible questions to ponder, but EON has left us no choice with this ridiculous Bond/Blofeld storyline. Leaving this at chance or coincidence is worse than the alternative described above.
+2
+1 because I agree with you, and +1 because he screwed up the title. Obviously not a real Bond fan.