SPECTRE: So who's going to play Ernst?

1141517192054

Comments

  • Samuel001Samuel001 Moderator
    Posts: 13,355
    This goes back to the comments Jesper Christiansen made and then went back on. No big deal I would think. That was years ago.
  • Posts: 6,396
    Dragonpol wrote:
    Dragonpol wrote:
    Murdock wrote:
    Dragonpol wrote:
    Sort of the new Emilio Largo, if you will. There I go with my FRWL-GF-TB reasoning again!

    Well possibly even a Blofeld type who prefers to be on the field with his people rather than sitting around. In QoS when everyone was blowing there position, he stayed put and removed his ear piece. He's smart, calculating. He know's when to move and when not too. He could be so manipulative his whole identity could be an alias. His one slip-up was when Bond shot him in the leg. But he still got away. To me he is the Blofeld of the reboot so far. Him and Quantum need to return. Bond will be back with a fresh start while White and Quantum are waiting to strike.

    Indeed. White has one of those faces and is one of those characters not seen in a Bond film since perhaps the 1960s. A fascinating figure. The screenwriters have only whetted our appetite thus far though, I feel.

    And I wonder if Jesper Christiansen blew any chance a few years ago of being asked to return as Mr White

    I see no evidence to suggest this, unless you have any that you can provide here?

    He was quoted in the media, in 2010 I think it was, that he had said the two Bond movies he made were shit.

    He later backtracked and said that his comments had been taken out of context. Whilst he went on to say how brilliant CR was, he made no reference at all to QoS.
  • Posts: 15,106
    Dragonpol wrote:
    bondsum wrote:
    What makes you think EON are following the GF non-SPECTRE blueprint and going with a recurring crime syndicate theme for Skyfall's sequel? Thunderball was a published Fleming novel so it was obvious that SPECTRE would return. Bond 24 will be an original screenplay that can go in any direction without the inclusion of QUANTUM. Wishful thinking is no substitute for the fact that QoS was perceived as a creative misfire, @Dragonpol.

    Well, I just see a pattern emerging and this is a reboot so I know nothing is a given, but surely the Quantum organisation is the Phoenix that has risen from the flames of Quantum of Solace and its perceived critical failure, no? They would be silly to throw all of this away and have another stand-alone Bond film IMHO. I think Quantum was written with some foresight that there would be an arc for it throughout the Craig era or at least that is how it appears to me. I'm sure you see my point @bondsum?

    I would add to this that QOS had mixed reviews, it was not universally hated, and the criticism was not aimed at Quantum itself.

    Also, it is a recent trend in franchises to have recurring adversaries.
  • DragonpolDragonpol https://thebondologistblog.blogspot.com
    edited August 2013 Posts: 18,264
    Ludovico wrote:
    Dragonpol wrote:
    bondsum wrote:
    What makes you think EON are following the GF non-SPECTRE blueprint and going with a recurring crime syndicate theme for Skyfall's sequel? Thunderball was a published Fleming novel so it was obvious that SPECTRE would return. Bond 24 will be an original screenplay that can go in any direction without the inclusion of QUANTUM. Wishful thinking is no substitute for the fact that QoS was perceived as a creative misfire, @Dragonpol.

    Well, I just see a pattern emerging and this is a reboot so I know nothing is a given, but surely the Quantum organisation is the Phoenix that has risen from the flames of Quantum of Solace and its perceived critical failure, no? They would be silly to throw all of this away and have another stand-alone Bond film IMHO. I think Quantum was written with some foresight that there would be an arc for it throughout the Craig era or at least that is how it appears to me. I'm sure you see my point @bondsum?

    I would add to this that QOS had mixed reviews, it was not universally hated, and the criticism was not aimed at Quantum itself.

    Also, it is a recent trend in franchises to have recurring adversaries.

    Indeed - the Quantum organisation can still be salvaged from the flames as the Phoenix, can it not? Quantum as a villainous organisation remains unsullied, does it not?
  • Posts: 15,106
    Dragonpol wrote:
    Ludovico wrote:
    Dragonpol wrote:
    bondsum wrote:
    What makes you think EON are following the GF non-SPECTRE blueprint and going with a recurring crime syndicate theme for Skyfall's sequel? Thunderball was a published Fleming novel so it was obvious that SPECTRE would return. Bond 24 will be an original screenplay that can go in any direction without the inclusion of QUANTUM. Wishful thinking is no substitute for the fact that QoS was perceived as a creative misfire, @Dragonpol.

    Well, I just see a pattern emerging and this is a reboot so I know nothing is a given, but surely the Quantum organisation is the Phoenix that has risen from the flames of Quantum of Solace and its perceived critical failure, no? They would be silly to throw all of this away and have another stand-alone Bond film IMHO. I think Quantum was written with some foresight that there would be an arc for it throughout the Craig era or at least that is how it appears to me. I'm sure you see my point @bondsum?

    I would add to this that QOS had mixed reviews, it was not universally hated, and the criticism was not aimed at Quantum itself.

    Also, it is a recent trend in franchises to have recurring adversaries.

    Indeed - the Quantum organisation can still be salvaged from the flames as the Phoenix, can it not? Quantum as a villainous organisation remains unsullied, does it not?

    I certainly think so. Who ever said, when they criticized QOS negatively: "what's the point of a recurring organization that will show up later as a menace?". And nobody complained about the League of Shadows and Magneto being reused in their respective franchises. Heck, the Joker was mentioned in Batman Begins before showing up in TDK, so was Moriarty in the first Sherlock Holmes movie, in The Amazing Spider-Man there is a villain looming in the shadow for the sequel(s) (not that I liked the movie), we had a glimpse of the Leader in The Incredible Hulk... it does not mean Bond 24 will follow this trend, of course, but there is certainly a trend.
  • DragonpolDragonpol https://thebondologistblog.blogspot.com
    Posts: 18,264
    Ludovico wrote:
    Dragonpol wrote:
    Ludovico wrote:
    Dragonpol wrote:
    bondsum wrote:
    What makes you think EON are following the GF non-SPECTRE blueprint and going with a recurring crime syndicate theme for Skyfall's sequel? Thunderball was a published Fleming novel so it was obvious that SPECTRE would return. Bond 24 will be an original screenplay that can go in any direction without the inclusion of QUANTUM. Wishful thinking is no substitute for the fact that QoS was perceived as a creative misfire, @Dragonpol.

    Well, I just see a pattern emerging and this is a reboot so I know nothing is a given, but surely the Quantum organisation is the Phoenix that has risen from the flames of Quantum of Solace and its perceived critical failure, no? They would be silly to throw all of this away and have another stand-alone Bond film IMHO. I think Quantum was written with some foresight that there would be an arc for it throughout the Craig era or at least that is how it appears to me. I'm sure you see my point @bondsum?

    I would add to this that QOS had mixed reviews, it was not universally hated, and the criticism was not aimed at Quantum itself.

    Also, it is a recent trend in franchises to have recurring adversaries.

    Indeed - the Quantum organisation can still be salvaged from the flames as the Phoenix, can it not? Quantum as a villainous organisation remains unsullied, does it not?

    I certainly think so. Who ever said, when they criticized QOS negatively: "what's the point of a recurring organization that will show up later as a menace?". And nobody complained about the League of Shadows and Magneto being reused in their respective franchises. Heck, the Joker was mentioned in Batman Begins before showing up in TDK, so was Moriarty in the first Sherlock Holmes movie, in The Amazing Spider-Man there is a villain looming in the shadow for the sequel(s) (not that I liked the movie), we had a glimpse of the Leader in The Incredible Hulk... it does not mean Bond 24 will follow this trend, of course, but there is certainly a trend.

    Indeed there is a trend. It's a bit like the masked Blofeld in FRWL and TB coming back in the later Bond films YOLT, OHMSS and DAF. You are more widely watched in terms of fiolm franchises than I am, but you definitely do make a very good case for a returning villain as a theme current in franchise films with that list of yours, @Ludovico!
  • edited August 2013 Posts: 11,119
    That's why I think Blofeld should be introduced carefully ánd slowly.

    Why not let Blofeld be uncredited in Bond 24? So Michael and Barbara can worry first about the 'main villain', being the Nr. 2 behind Blofeld. Some kind of 'Largo'. Mr. White is still alive and kicking. So why not return Danish actor Jesper Christensen for the job. Reveal his real name in Bond 24. But also reveal that Jesper Christensen is working for a still unknown Nr. 1 of 'THE QUANTUM OF SPECTRE'? Blofeld will be played by a more unknown actor and will be uncredited like in FRWL and TB.

    In the meanwhile we all know pre-production on Bond 25 has started as well. So for Bond 25, due to premiere somewhere in November 2017 or November 2018, Barbara and Michael can cast an Oscar-winning actor for the role of Ernst Stavro Blofeld...being Christoph Waltz, Philip Seymour-Hoffman, Daniel Day-Lewis or Michael Shannon. And on top of that....Blofeld wil be unvealed after or during the end credits....a trick that has been done with certain other spy/action franchises...but has never been done in the Bond franchise! I think that could work very well for Bond 25....and it will build up tension for both Bond 25 and Bond 26.

    And when Blofeld's face is revelealed during or after the end credits of Bond 25....we will see him killing Nr. 2, played by Christensen.....in a Blofeld-esque way off course. Roger Deakins camera zooms in on Blofeld's SPECTRE-ring....and the rest of the end credits, including the locations and the famous 'James Bond will return', will start.

    Then, we can see Blofeld at work full throttle in Bond 26....probably Craig's last Bond film.

    Guys.....EON Productions should hire me lol =)).
  • DragonpolDragonpol https://thebondologistblog.blogspot.com
    Posts: 18,264
    That's why I think Blofeld should be introduced carefully ánd slowly.

    Why not let Blofeld be uncredited in Bond 24? So Michael and Barbara can worry first about the 'main villain', being the Nr. 2 behind Blofeld. Some kind of 'Largo'. Mr. White is still alive and kicking. So why not return Danish actor Jesper Christensen for the job. Reveal his real name in Bond 24. But also reveal that Jesper Christensen is working for a still unknown Nr. 1 of 'THE QUANTUM OF SPECTRE'? Blofeld will be played by a more unknown actor and will be uncredited like in FRWL and TB.

    In the meanwhile we all know pre-production on Bond 25 has started as well, so for Bond 25, due to premiere somewhere in November 2017 or November 2018, Barbara and Michael can cast an Oscar-winning actor for the role of Ernst Stavro Blofeld...being Christoph Waltz, Philip Seymour-Hoffman, Daniel Day-Lewis or Michael Shannon. And on top of that....Blofeld wil be unvealed after or during the end credits....a trick that has been done with certain other spy/action franchises...but never in a Bond film! I think that could work very well for Bond 25....and it will build up tension for both Bond 25 and Bond 26.

    And during or at the end of the end credits of Bond 25....we will see Blofeld revealed, by cold-heartedly killing a member of SPECTRE, zooming in at Blofeld's SPECTRE ring as well.

    Then, we can see Blofeld at work full throttle in Bond 26....probably Craig's last Bond film.

    Guys.....EON Productions should hire me lol =)).

    Just like Q and Miss Moneypenny, then?
  • Posts: 11,119
    Dragonpol wrote:
    That's why I think Blofeld should be introduced carefully ánd slowly.

    Why not let Blofeld be uncredited in Bond 24? So Michael and Barbara can worry first about the 'main villain', being the Nr. 2 behind Blofeld. Some kind of 'Largo'. Mr. White is still alive and kicking. So why not return Danish actor Jesper Christensen for the job. Reveal his real name in Bond 24. But also reveal that Jesper Christensen is working for a still unknown Nr. 1 of 'THE QUANTUM OF SPECTRE'? Blofeld will be played by a more unknown actor and will be uncredited like in FRWL and TB.

    In the meanwhile we all know pre-production on Bond 25 has started as well, so for Bond 25, due to premiere somewhere in November 2017 or November 2018, Barbara and Michael can cast an Oscar-winning actor for the role of Ernst Stavro Blofeld...being Christoph Waltz, Philip Seymour-Hoffman, Daniel Day-Lewis or Michael Shannon. And on top of that....Blofeld wil be unvealed after or during the end credits....a trick that has been done with certain other spy/action franchises...but never in a Bond film! I think that could work very well for Bond 25....and it will build up tension for both Bond 25 and Bond 26.

    And during or at the end of the end credits of Bond 25....we will see Blofeld revealed, by cold-heartedly killing a member of SPECTRE, zooming in at Blofeld's SPECTRE ring as well.

    Then, we can see Blofeld at work full throttle in Bond 26....probably Craig's last Bond film.

    Guys.....EON Productions should hire me lol =)).

    Just like Q and Miss Moneypenny, then?

    Can you please clarify your question @Dragonpol :-)?
  • DragonpolDragonpol https://thebondologistblog.blogspot.com
    Posts: 18,264
    Dragonpol wrote:
    That's why I think Blofeld should be introduced carefully ánd slowly.

    Why not let Blofeld be uncredited in Bond 24? So Michael and Barbara can worry first about the 'main villain', being the Nr. 2 behind Blofeld. Some kind of 'Largo'. Mr. White is still alive and kicking. So why not return Danish actor Jesper Christensen for the job. Reveal his real name in Bond 24. But also reveal that Jesper Christensen is working for a still unknown Nr. 1 of 'THE QUANTUM OF SPECTRE'? Blofeld will be played by a more unknown actor and will be uncredited like in FRWL and TB.

    In the meanwhile we all know pre-production on Bond 25 has started as well, so for Bond 25, due to premiere somewhere in November 2017 or November 2018, Barbara and Michael can cast an Oscar-winning actor for the role of Ernst Stavro Blofeld...being Christoph Waltz, Philip Seymour-Hoffman, Daniel Day-Lewis or Michael Shannon. And on top of that....Blofeld wil be unvealed after or during the end credits....a trick that has been done with certain other spy/action franchises...but never in a Bond film! I think that could work very well for Bond 25....and it will build up tension for both Bond 25 and Bond 26.

    And during or at the end of the end credits of Bond 25....we will see Blofeld revealed, by cold-heartedly killing a member of SPECTRE, zooming in at Blofeld's SPECTRE ring as well.

    Then, we can see Blofeld at work full throttle in Bond 26....probably Craig's last Bond film.

    Guys.....EON Productions should hire me lol =)).

    Just like Q and Miss Moneypenny, then?

    Can you please clarify your question @Dragonpol :-)?

    It was more a rhetorical question, with no real need for an answer. What I meant to say was you want Blofeld to earn his place as the "Old Firm" of Q and Miss Moneypenny had to? Yes?
  • edited August 2013 Posts: 11,119
    I think a villain still is a villain. And yes, in the end I want Blofeld to be pulling the strings. But not immediately. Slowly, with great care and precision as I just pointed out.

    Should Blofeld become the bald, cat-stroking bastard again like we could witness in the 1960's? A sheer copy of the 1960's Blofeld? NO! But....a villain still is a villain. I thought Silva was done perfectly. The best villain in the Bond films since the 1980's if you ask me. It was a modern-day villain, created for the political times we live in.

    BUT Silva was still a Bond villain. He had his weird, tong-in-cheek, habits, like Blofeld and Dr. No. And Le Chiffre had a bleeding eye, just like Blofeld's scar. So certain things should always stay the same and be recognizable as 'typical Bond'.

    I think you need to find the right balance with the Bond villain :-).
  • I just read this nice article on MI6-HQ:

    <url>http://www.mi6-hq.com/news/index.php?itemid=11158&t=mi6&s=news</url>;

    So as I already expected for quite some time, I am very happy with this news-item. It means that Barbara Brocolli and Michael G. Wilson won't get the chills when they read the words 'Ernst Stavro Blofeld' and 'S.P.E.C.T.R.E'. In fact, this news paves the way to a renewed introduction of Mr. Blofeld and SPECTRE no :-)? At least.....I'm still hoping hehe.
  • Posts: 1,970
    My I remind this website that Blofelds dead, finished. At least what he can expect from you guys is a little plain solid thinking on who the real villains will be in Bond 24 & 25
  • Posts: 6,396
    fjdinardo wrote:
    My I remind this website that Blofelds dead, finished. At least what he can expect from you guys is a little plain solid thinking on who the real villains will be in Bond 24 & 25

    But I've been looking forward to this moment Mr Fjdinardo. I intend to enjoy it to the full.
  • fjdinardo wrote:
    My I remind this website that Blofelds dead, finished. At least what he can expect from you guys is a little plain solid thinking on who the real villains will be in Bond 24 & 25

    May I remind you that the Bond franchise has been rebooted with a new timeline ever since 'Casino Royale' premiered? May I remind you that there is no greaving anymore for Bond on Tracy? Because in fact as of now she actually never existed.
  • Posts: 1,970
    fjdinardo wrote:
    My I remind this website that Blofelds dead, finished. At least what he can expect from you guys is a little plain solid thinking on who the real villains will be in Bond 24 & 25

    May I remind you that the Bond franchise has been rebooted with a new timeline ever since 'Casino Royale' premiered? May I remind you that there is no greaving anymore for Bond on Tracy? Because in fact as of now she actually never existed.

    I still dont think will ever see Blofeld again, or Spectre for that matter
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Of course we will. Hopefully during the next Bond actor s tenure.
  • For those of you who still don't think (or want) Blofeld to return, you're simply kidding yourselves. Since MGM has now gone public about buying back the McClory Estate, it's obvious that they are moving toward a revival of the Blofeld character. And why not? People say, "Oh he's dead and done for" and "he's not realistic enough of a character". Please! The series got re-booted with CR, so everything that came before is essentially unrelated and never happened. What's more, I actually think that Blofeld could be more realistic a villain in todays world than he was back in the 60's. Forget the white cats and hollowed out volcano's, if they re-invented Blofeld in a modern context, a group of wealthy individuals lead by a single ruthless leader trying to covertly manipulate world affairs to their liking, that seems pretty believable to me.

    Also you can forget the argument about "Blofeld's used too much" and "oh lets have some new and original characters fore once!" Save for the silly appearance he had in FYEO, it's been 42 years since Blofeld has been in a Bond movie. 42 YEARS!!! 16 MOVIES!!! That's a lifetime! What's more, on that line of argument, you could also infer that Bond himself as a character is over-used and too unoriginal, and that the series should have died out long ago. I don't think any of us here would feel that way.

    On a larger note, a character like Blofeld, even if he is a little unbelievable is essential to the Bond franchise because he makes Bond's existence valid. Let's face it, there isn't really a handsome british secret agent jetting around the world in enormous luxury saving the world today any more than there is a scare faced cat stroking evildoer plotting his next scheme at world domination in some secret lair some place. It's all fiction, and that's why we all love it, to believe that the world is a more romantic and interesting place that it really is. Frankly, if you aren't absolutely excited about the idea of Blofeld returning in Bond 24, I don't see how you can call yourself a Bond fan...
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,960
    I've always loved people who feel like they have the authority to dictate who is or isn't a Bond fan. "If you don't like this, I don't see how you aren't a Bond fan." "If you aren't excited for this, how do you consider yourself a Bond fan." Who do you think you are?
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    edited November 2013 Posts: 16,351
    Creasy47 wrote:
    I've always loved people who feel like they have the authority to dictate who is or isn't a Bond fan. "If you don't like this, I don't see how you aren't a Bond fan." "If you aren't excited for this, how do you consider yourself a Bond fan." Who do you think you are?
    Post of the day!
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,960
    Murdock wrote:
    Creasy47 wrote:
    I've always loved people who feel like they have the authority to dictate who is or isn't a Bond fan. "If you don't like this, I don't see how you aren't a Bond fan." "If you aren't excited for this, how do you consider yourself a Bond fan." Who do you think you are?
    Post of the day!

    Thank you, and it's true. I don't care who you are or what you like or dislike, you have no right to state something like that. Some of us feel that Blofeld should be left to what he was given, and not crop up every so often. How many times can he be defeated? Is he to return in 'Bond 24,' get killed off in a film or two, and magically appear again in another thirty or forty years? Whatever, it's your opinion. If he returns, I won't loathe the world or write the film off, I'll still see it as much as possible and enjoy it as much as I can, I'd just prefer that they keep with Quantum and introduce a head villain, preferably a female. Doesn't make me any more/less of a Bond fan than someone who does want Blofeld to return.

    Whew, really irks me.
  • Posts: 15,106
    fjdinardo wrote:
    My I remind this website that Blofelds dead, finished. At least what he can expect from you guys is a little plain solid thinking on who the real villains will be in Bond 24 & 25

    But that was in the earlier continuity.
    I just read this nice article on MI6-HQ:

    <url>http://www.mi6-hq.com/news/index.php?itemid=11158&t=mi6&s=news</url>;

    So as I already expected for quite some time, I am very happy with this news-item. It means that Barbara Brocolli and Michael G. Wilson won't get the chills when they read the words 'Ernst Stavro Blofeld' and 'S.P.E.C.T.R.E'. In fact, this news paves the way to a renewed introduction of Mr. Blofeld and SPECTRE no :-)? At least.....I'm still hoping hehe.

    Regardless of whether or not Blofeld is coming back, it is nice to see McClory does not hold him or SPECTRE anymore, even and especially from the grave.
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    edited November 2013 Posts: 16,351
    If Blofeld returns in B24 or B25, I want Boris Grishenko to be re_introduced in B26. He was pretty much cryogenically frozen so he could return and be Bond 7's new returning villain. Oh! and he'll start his own evil organization. K.N.O.C.K.E.R.S. [End Sarcasm]
  • LicencedToKilt69007LicencedToKilt69007 Belgium, Wallonia
    Posts: 523
    @Creasy47 and @Murdock : So true. It really is the post of the day ; they're many types of Bond fans and one can find similarities with another one. And differences obviously. I think we should enjoy each other's post (when it's relevant of course) and keep going on. As you said (@Creasy47), we don't know each other so, we should respect each ones and their different opinion even more. When you're someone who received good upbringing. This, in general.

    BTW, I wouldn't like Blofeld to come back. He should be left as it is nowadays. A memory from the past. If any future films refers to it (in dialogues for example), that'd be ok but a come back isn't much credible. The return of Quantum is more up to date (I also like the idea of a female leader)

    @Murdock : Concerning BG, I had the same idea when I was typing my own stories and I think you made a great transition for some return. A great idea indeed. Quite realistic. Nice video :)
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,960
    I try to respect all opinions and try not to shoot someone down for what they want in a film or what they like or dislike, but I would question someone's fandom solely based on something they do or don't want. It's pathetic.
  • Posts: 15,106
    Minus his last comment bout who is a fan and not a fan, I pretty much agree with all of what sirseanisbond said in his post.
  • LicencedToKilt69007LicencedToKilt69007 Belgium, Wallonia
    Posts: 523
    @Creasy47 : Of course, and so do I about the respect.
  • edited November 2013 Posts: 11,119
    For those of you who still don't think (or want) Blofeld to return, you're simply kidding yourselves. Since MGM has now gone public about buying back the McClory Estate, it's obvious that they are moving toward a revival of the Blofeld character. And why not? People say, "Oh he's dead and done for" and "he's not realistic enough of a character". Please! The series got re-booted with CR, so everything that came before is essentially unrelated and never happened. What's more, I actually think that Blofeld could be more realistic a villain in todays world than he was back in the 60's. Forget the white cats and hollowed out volcano's, if they re-invented Blofeld in a modern context, a group of wealthy individuals lead by a single ruthless leader trying to covertly manipulate world affairs to their liking, that seems pretty believable to me.

    Also you can forget the argument about "Blofeld's used too much" and "oh lets have some new and original characters fore once!" Save for the silly appearance he had in FYEO, it's been 42 years since Blofeld has been in a Bond movie. 42 YEARS!!! 16 MOVIES!!! That's a lifetime! What's more, on that line of argument, you could also infer that Bond himself as a character is over-used and too unoriginal, and that the series should have died out long ago. I don't think any of us here would feel that way.

    On a larger note, a character like Blofeld, even if he is a little unbelievable is essential to the Bond franchise because he makes Bond's existence valid. Let's face it, there isn't really a handsome british secret agent jetting around the world in enormous luxury saving the world today any more than there is a scare faced cat stroking evildoer plotting his next scheme at world domination in some secret lair some place. It's all fiction, and that's why we all love it, to believe that the world is a more romantic and interesting place that it really is. Frankly, if you aren't absolutely excited about the idea of Blofeld returning in Bond 24, I don't see how you can call yourself a Bond fan...

    Apart from the last sentence -which I totally disagree with-, I wholeheartedly agree with the essence of your post :-).

    One more thing, I think if someone is very passionate about something he/she wants to say, one easily makes some of those 'mistakes'. But please, don't take it personal.
  • Posts: 15,106
    I am of two minds about seeing Blofeld sooner. I would love to see him again, but maybe not so soon. Linking him with Quantum may work, but I would rather have Quantum be an entirely different entity. And part of thinks that Blofeld should be used for Craig's successor, as a "hook" for the future new tenure.
Sign In or Register to comment.