What would be Cubby's favorite Michael Wilson/Barbara Broccoli Bond movie?

QuantumOrganizationQuantumOrganization We have people everywhere
edited January 2017 in Bond Movies Posts: 1,187
Hello,

A little hypothetical

If Cubby was alive till 2016 and saw Goldeneye to SPECTRE what would you think his favorite film would be?

If we wanted to expand on that a little bit, we could discuss his thoughts on certain creative decisions they have made?

Reference:

MGW Barbara Broccoli Era (1995-2015)

Goldeneye
Tomorrow Never Dies
The World is Not Enough
Die another Day
Casino Royale
Quantum of Solace
Skyfall
SPECTRE
«13

Comments

  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,511
    CR
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,247
    Do we know what Cubby's favourite Bond film was?
    If not, how can we expect the producer of such totally different films as TLD, MR, FRWL, AVTAK, OHMSS, ... to pick from such totally different films as TND, GE, CR, DAD, ...? I got nothing on this. We can't even speculate, now can we?
  • edited January 2017 Posts: 463
    I seem to recall in a behind the scenes documentary that Cubby said From Russia With Love, Goldfinger and The Spy Who Loved Me were his three favorites.

    I would have to say GoldenEye, just for the simple fact that I'm unsure if he would even have hired Craig in the first place.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,247
    See, FRWL, GF and TSWLM are three pretty different Bond films.
    GE, SF, SP and CR probably come closest to FRWL.
    I guess TND and DAD are close enough to TSWLM.
    TWINE and QOS are tougher.

    Incidentally, I believe Broccoli might have hired Craig after all. Dalton wasn't exactly a playing-by-the-book decision either and Cubby was quite fond of him.
  • DragonpolDragonpol https://thebondologistblog.blogspot.com
    edited January 2017 Posts: 18,334
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    Do we know what Cubby's favourite Bond film was?
    If not, how can we expect the producer of such totally different films as TLD, MR, FRWL, AVTAK, OHMSS, ... to pick from such totally different films as TND, GE, CR, DAD, ...? I got nothing on this. We can't even speculate, now can we?

    As part of his savvy marketing for the release of each Bond film Cubby always said (if asked by an interviewer) that his favourite Bond film was the current one, even AVTAK.
    ;)

    So, on that basis, I'd say his favourite is Spectre.*




    *He is dead now, mind.
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    It's all speculative but it's fun so here we go.

    I strongly believe films like DAD, CR, QOS and SF would never have happened the way they did, had Cubby been a decade younger and had lived a long, long life, being in control of the series.

    Cubby would have loved TND, TWINE, SP

    DAD: Cubby would have toned down on the OTT Sci-Fi stuff, but I still think it would have been only slightly different.

    Brosnan would have been Bond at least until 2008, or 2012.
    Cubby was a gentleman and a fair business men and would NEVER have treated Brosnan like shit, as BB did.

    CR: It would have been more or less the same, but without abandoning what Cubby loved so much like the proper Gunbarrel, M, MP

    QOS: this movie simply wouldn't exist, there would be something completely different

    SF: this movie would have a story that actually makes sense, maybe with the same characters but an established MP, Q.

    It's a shame his daughter has so little respect for some of the things that defined Bond. Lately I also think, she might do the franchise in one of these days.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 41,007
    @BondJasonBond006, what is it exactly you think he would've loathed about SF, but loved about SP? I'd assume he'd prefer SF way before SP, but we'll never really know.
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    @Creasy47
    I didn't say he would have loathed it. Not at all. I think the would like the film enough as it is, but the story would be different, more Bondian with a clear plot (villain with some sinister "world domination" plan), Silva's backstory may have been only a small part to define the character.

    I also think he would have liked Daniel Craig, but he'd never been Bond anyway if Cubby lived.
  • DragonpolDragonpol https://thebondologistblog.blogspot.com
    Posts: 18,334
    In all seriousness I'd guess Cubby would pick CR and SF as his favourites, were he still with us.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 41,007
    Perhaps not loathed, then, but I find it odd to say that he wouldn't have liked SF because the story didn't make sense, but he would've loved SP, which has an equally ridiculous (if not worse) story.
  • Posts: 12,526
    I would go with Casino Royale!
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    That can be debated.
    SP has a clear plot with a clear goal that the villain is aiming at.
    There are no major plot holes. And the few there are don't matter as it is a film not taking itself very seriously, like it is the normal case for a Bond film.
    SF on the other hand made the grave mistake to dispose of all the fun and take itself way too seriously, the many plot holes, about all concerning Silva, is just unbelievably lazy writing, if not downright stupid.

    One thing is for sure, SP would have been like it is, but Blofeld would have been Blofeld without the awkward foster-brother thing.

    SP is exactly the kind of film, Cubby would love to bits. Pure Bond, pure fun, pure entertainment with daring original stunt work to just name a few examples.
  • acoppolaacoppola London Ealing not far from where Bob Simmons lived
    edited January 2017 Posts: 1,243
    Without question Goldeneye. He picked Brosnan and always wanted him. He would not have fired him after DAD, but got a different director. Brosnan was good box office and the studio would have agreed. Take Craig out of the equation. Cubby had a thing for Bond being six foot tall.

    Also Cubby vetoed Barbara and Michael Wilson when they wanted to cast Sam Neill. So, Craig would likewise be a no!!!

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/film/james-bond-spectre/rejected-casting-audition/

    The above link tells you what Cubby thought of Ranulph Fiennes, so I shall leave it to the imagination what he would think of Craig.

  • I think Cubby would have liked Tomorrow Never Dies the best: a straightforward action-adventure one step into the future with real-world stunts, humor, glamor, triumphant blasts of the James Bond theme, and a larger-than-life plot to ignite World War Three via the trendiest topic of the day: the media. Plus, as stated before, Brosnan was Cubby's man, and here Brosnan had really grown fully into the role and made it his own. And it's hard not to imagine Cubby getting along swimmingly with the likes of Jonathan Pryce and Michelle Yeoh on set. And countdown to destruction...so, yeah.
  • Posts: 4,325
    acoppola wrote: »
    Without question Goldeneye. He picked Brosnan and always wanted him. He would not have fired him after DAD, but got a different director. Brosnan was good box office and the studio would have agreed. Take Craig out of the equation. Cubby had a thing for Bond being six foot tall.

    Also Cubby vetoed Barbara and Michael Wilson when they wanted to cast Sam Neill. So, Craig would likewise be a no!!!

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/film/james-bond-spectre/rejected-casting-audition/

    The above link tells you what Cubby thought of Ranulph Fiennes, so I shall leave it to the imagination what he would think of Craig.

    Cubby wanted Dalton ahead of Brosnan in '86 and it was the studio that were pushing for Brosnan for GoldenEye, Cubby wanted Dalton to continue.
  • Major_BoothroydMajor_Boothroyd Republic of Isthmus
    Posts: 2,722
    Birdleson wrote: »
    I say SF because Cubby liked moneymakers and broad public appeal.

    Agreed. If we're talking about Cubby just retiring and sitting back and watching all the same things occur then SF would be his favourite especially with Adele winning an Oscar and the 50th but I also think he'd get a real kick out of CR's critical reception. He probably hadn't seen love like that from critics since the 60s. And the revitalisation of the Bond franchise.

  • acoppolaacoppola London Ealing not far from where Bob Simmons lived
    Posts: 1,243
    tanaka123 wrote: »
    acoppola wrote: »
    Without question Goldeneye. He picked Brosnan and always wanted him. He would not have fired him after DAD, but got a different director. Brosnan was good box office and the studio would have agreed. Take Craig out of the equation. Cubby had a thing for Bond being six foot tall.

    Also Cubby vetoed Barbara and Michael Wilson when they wanted to cast Sam Neill. So, Craig would likewise be a no!!!

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/film/james-bond-spectre/rejected-casting-audition/

    The above link tells you what Cubby thought of Ranulph Fiennes, so I shall leave it to the imagination what he would think of Craig.

    Cubby wanted Dalton ahead of Brosnan in '86 and it was the studio that were pushing for Brosnan for GoldenEye, Cubby wanted Dalton to continue.

    That is true. Dalton was approached first, but, turned down the role due to Brenda Starr. Brosnan was then approached and almost cast, but lost the role due to the Rimington Steele series being extended.

    Cubby was honourable and did not let Dalton go so easily. When Cubby was ill, Dalton visited him constantly, so they were close.

    But, once Dalton felt that committing to four more films was too much, then Brosnan was approached.

    What I meant about Dalton and Brosnan, is that for Cubby, they were perfect from the standpoint of look Cubby wanted for Bond.



  • acoppolaacoppola London Ealing not far from where Bob Simmons lived
    edited January 2017 Posts: 1,243
    Birdleson wrote: »
    I say SF because Cubby liked moneymakers and broad public appeal.

    Agreed. If we're talking about Cubby just retiring and sitting back and watching all the same things occur then SF would be his favourite especially with Adele winning an Oscar and the 50th but I also think he'd get a real kick out of CR's critical reception. He probably hadn't seen love like that from critics since the 60s. And the revitalisation of the Bond franchise.

    Disagree. Cubby approved of Brosnan for the casting in Goldeneye. Simple facts dictate that with Cubby around, there would be no Craig. And Goldeneye was very well critically received.

    I cannot imagine Cubby being thrilled with Craig's hairstyle choice in SF. Looked more suited to a villain in Tarantino's Inglorious Basterds!



  • Posts: 4,325
    acoppola wrote: »
    Birdleson wrote: »
    I say SF because Cubby liked moneymakers and broad public appeal.

    Agreed. If we're talking about Cubby just retiring and sitting back and watching all the same things occur then SF would be his favourite especially with Adele winning an Oscar and the 50th but I also think he'd get a real kick out of CR's critical reception. He probably hadn't seen love like that from critics since the 60s. And the revitalisation of the Bond franchise.

    Disagree. Cubby approved of Brosnan for the casting in Goldeneye. Simple facts dictate that with Cubby around, there would be no Craig. And Goldeneye was very well critically received.

    I cannot imagine Cubby being thrilled with Craig's hairstyle choice in SF. Looked more suited to a villain in Tarantino's Inglorious Basterds!



    He wasn't thrilled with Roger Moore to begin with.
  • acoppolaacoppola London Ealing not far from where Bob Simmons lived
    Posts: 1,243
    tanaka123 wrote: »
    acoppola wrote: »
    Birdleson wrote: »
    I say SF because Cubby liked moneymakers and broad public appeal.

    Agreed. If we're talking about Cubby just retiring and sitting back and watching all the same things occur then SF would be his favourite especially with Adele winning an Oscar and the 50th but I also think he'd get a real kick out of CR's critical reception. He probably hadn't seen love like that from critics since the 60s. And the revitalisation of the Bond franchise.

    Disagree. Cubby approved of Brosnan for the casting in Goldeneye. Simple facts dictate that with Cubby around, there would be no Craig. And Goldeneye was very well critically received.

    I cannot imagine Cubby being thrilled with Craig's hairstyle choice in SF. Looked more suited to a villain in Tarantino's Inglorious Basterds!



    He wasn't thrilled with Roger Moore to begin with.

    But, Moore had the English gentleman look which Broccoli liked. And Moore was huge as The Saint.

  • Posts: 4,325
    acoppola wrote: »
    tanaka123 wrote: »
    acoppola wrote: »
    Birdleson wrote: »
    I say SF because Cubby liked moneymakers and broad public appeal.

    Agreed. If we're talking about Cubby just retiring and sitting back and watching all the same things occur then SF would be his favourite especially with Adele winning an Oscar and the 50th but I also think he'd get a real kick out of CR's critical reception. He probably hadn't seen love like that from critics since the 60s. And the revitalisation of the Bond franchise.

    Disagree. Cubby approved of Brosnan for the casting in Goldeneye. Simple facts dictate that with Cubby around, there would be no Craig. And Goldeneye was very well critically received.

    I cannot imagine Cubby being thrilled with Craig's hairstyle choice in SF. Looked more suited to a villain in Tarantino's Inglorious Basterds!



    He wasn't thrilled with Roger Moore to begin with.

    But, Moore had the English gentleman look which Broccoli liked. And Moore was huge as The Saint.

    Exactly - he was won round to Moore.
  • acoppolaacoppola London Ealing not far from where Bob Simmons lived
    Posts: 1,243
    tanaka123 wrote: »
    acoppola wrote: »
    tanaka123 wrote: »
    acoppola wrote: »
    Birdleson wrote: »
    I say SF because Cubby liked moneymakers and broad public appeal.

    Agreed. If we're talking about Cubby just retiring and sitting back and watching all the same things occur then SF would be his favourite especially with Adele winning an Oscar and the 50th but I also think he'd get a real kick out of CR's critical reception. He probably hadn't seen love like that from critics since the 60s. And the revitalisation of the Bond franchise.

    Disagree. Cubby approved of Brosnan for the casting in Goldeneye. Simple facts dictate that with Cubby around, there would be no Craig. And Goldeneye was very well critically received.

    I cannot imagine Cubby being thrilled with Craig's hairstyle choice in SF. Looked more suited to a villain in Tarantino's Inglorious Basterds!



    He wasn't thrilled with Roger Moore to begin with.

    But, Moore had the English gentleman look which Broccoli liked. And Moore was huge as The Saint.

    Exactly - he was won round to Moore.

    For LALD, Guy Hamilton wanted Burt Reynolds. Cubby said no. He wanted Bond to be six feet tall. Craig would not have been considered.

    Moore was not a hard sell for Broccoli and a safe choice. You need to read Broccoli's autobiography.

  • edited January 2017 Posts: 4,325
    acoppola wrote: »
    tanaka123 wrote: »
    acoppola wrote: »
    tanaka123 wrote: »
    acoppola wrote: »
    Birdleson wrote: »
    I say SF because Cubby liked moneymakers and broad public appeal.

    Agreed. If we're talking about Cubby just retiring and sitting back and watching all the same things occur then SF would be his favourite especially with Adele winning an Oscar and the 50th but I also think he'd get a real kick out of CR's critical reception. He probably hadn't seen love like that from critics since the 60s. And the revitalisation of the Bond franchise.

    Disagree. Cubby approved of Brosnan for the casting in Goldeneye. Simple facts dictate that with Cubby around, there would be no Craig. And Goldeneye was very well critically received.

    I cannot imagine Cubby being thrilled with Craig's hairstyle choice in SF. Looked more suited to a villain in Tarantino's Inglorious Basterds!



    He wasn't thrilled with Roger Moore to begin with.

    But, Moore had the English gentleman look which Broccoli liked. And Moore was huge as The Saint.

    Exactly - he was won round to Moore.

    For LALD, Guy Hamilton wanted Burt Reynolds. Cubby said no. He wanted Bond to be six feet tall. Craig would not have been considered.

    Moore was not a hard sell for Broccoli and a safe choice. You need to read Broccoli's autobiography.

    I've read his autobiography, and I in no way disagree with you that Moore wasn't a hard sell for Broccoli only that he was intially sceptical. Specualting about whether Cubby would or would not have gone with Craig is pointless. Wilson and Campbell wanted Henry Cavill, but BB got her man. That's what happened and that's what matters. Incidentally Peter Lamont was also against Cavill and pro-Craig.
  • acoppolaacoppola London Ealing not far from where Bob Simmons lived
    Posts: 1,243
    tanaka123 wrote: »
    acoppola wrote: »
    tanaka123 wrote: »
    acoppola wrote: »
    tanaka123 wrote: »
    acoppola wrote: »
    Birdleson wrote: »
    I say SF because Cubby liked moneymakers and broad public appeal.

    Agreed. If we're talking about Cubby just retiring and sitting back and watching all the same things occur then SF would be his favourite especially with Adele winning an Oscar and the 50th but I also think he'd get a real kick out of CR's critical reception. He probably hadn't seen love like that from critics since the 60s. And the revitalisation of the Bond franchise.

    Disagree. Cubby approved of Brosnan for the casting in Goldeneye. Simple facts dictate that with Cubby around, there would be no Craig. And Goldeneye was very well critically received.

    I cannot imagine Cubby being thrilled with Craig's hairstyle choice in SF. Looked more suited to a villain in Tarantino's Inglorious Basterds!



    He wasn't thrilled with Roger Moore to begin with.

    But, Moore had the English gentleman look which Broccoli liked. And Moore was huge as The Saint.

    Exactly - he was won round to Moore.

    For LALD, Guy Hamilton wanted Burt Reynolds. Cubby said no. He wanted Bond to be six feet tall. Craig would not have been considered.

    Moore was not a hard sell for Broccoli and a safe choice. You need to read Broccoli's autobiography.

    I've read his autobiograhy, and I in no way disagree with you that Moore wasn't a hard sell for Broccoli only that he was intially sceptical. Specualting about whether Cubby would or would not have gone with Craig is pointless.

    If Broccoli vetoed Sam Neill's casting in 1986, despite everyone else in favour, there is no way he would be more generous to Craig.

    There is no speculation knowing Broccoli's preferences. I find the revisionism of Broccoli's tastes laughable. You may as well tell me Quentin Tarantino prefers Craig over Brosnan.


  • Posts: 4,325
    acoppola wrote: »
    tanaka123 wrote: »
    acoppola wrote: »
    tanaka123 wrote: »
    acoppola wrote: »
    tanaka123 wrote: »
    acoppola wrote: »
    Birdleson wrote: »
    I say SF because Cubby liked moneymakers and broad public appeal.

    Agreed. If we're talking about Cubby just retiring and sitting back and watching all the same things occur then SF would be his favourite especially with Adele winning an Oscar and the 50th but I also think he'd get a real kick out of CR's critical reception. He probably hadn't seen love like that from critics since the 60s. And the revitalisation of the Bond franchise.

    Disagree. Cubby approved of Brosnan for the casting in Goldeneye. Simple facts dictate that with Cubby around, there would be no Craig. And Goldeneye was very well critically received.

    I cannot imagine Cubby being thrilled with Craig's hairstyle choice in SF. Looked more suited to a villain in Tarantino's Inglorious Basterds!



    He wasn't thrilled with Roger Moore to begin with.

    But, Moore had the English gentleman look which Broccoli liked. And Moore was huge as The Saint.

    Exactly - he was won round to Moore.

    For LALD, Guy Hamilton wanted Burt Reynolds. Cubby said no. He wanted Bond to be six feet tall. Craig would not have been considered.

    Moore was not a hard sell for Broccoli and a safe choice. You need to read Broccoli's autobiography.

    I've read his autobiograhy, and I in no way disagree with you that Moore wasn't a hard sell for Broccoli only that he was intially sceptical. Specualting about whether Cubby would or would not have gone with Craig is pointless.

    If Broccoli vetoed Sam Neill's casting in 1986, despite everyone else in favour, there is no way he would be more generous to Craig.

    There is no speculation knowing Broccoli's preferences. I find the revisionism of Broccoli's tastes laughable. You may as well tell me Quentin Tarantino prefers Craig over Brosnan.


    Maybe so. You seem to be taking this all a little bit personally really, I haven't disagreed with you at all, don't really see where this angst is coming from. Take it easy.
  • acoppolaacoppola London Ealing not far from where Bob Simmons lived
    edited January 2017 Posts: 1,243
    tanaka123 wrote: »
    acoppola wrote: »
    tanaka123 wrote: »
    acoppola wrote: »
    tanaka123 wrote: »
    acoppola wrote: »
    tanaka123 wrote: »
    acoppola wrote: »
    Birdleson wrote: »
    I say SF because Cubby liked moneymakers and broad public appeal.

    Agreed. If we're talking about Cubby just retiring and sitting back and watching all the same things occur then SF would be his favourite especially with Adele winning an Oscar and the 50th but I also think he'd get a real kick out of CR's critical reception. He probably hadn't seen love like that from critics since the 60s. And the revitalisation of the Bond franchise.

    Disagree. Cubby approved of Brosnan for the casting in Goldeneye. Simple facts dictate that with Cubby around, there would be no Craig. And Goldeneye was very well critically received.

    I cannot imagine Cubby being thrilled with Craig's hairstyle choice in SF. Looked more suited to a villain in Tarantino's Inglorious Basterds!



    He wasn't thrilled with Roger Moore to begin with.

    But, Moore had the English gentleman look which Broccoli liked. And Moore was huge as The Saint.

    Exactly - he was won round to Moore.

    For LALD, Guy Hamilton wanted Burt Reynolds. Cubby said no. He wanted Bond to be six feet tall. Craig would not have been considered.

    Moore was not a hard sell for Broccoli and a safe choice. You need to read Broccoli's autobiography.

    I've read his autobiograhy, and I in no way disagree with you that Moore wasn't a hard sell for Broccoli only that he was intially sceptical. Specualting about whether Cubby would or would not have gone with Craig is pointless.

    If Broccoli vetoed Sam Neill's casting in 1986, despite everyone else in favour, there is no way he would be more generous to Craig.

    There is no speculation knowing Broccoli's preferences. I find the revisionism of Broccoli's tastes laughable. You may as well tell me Quentin Tarantino prefers Craig over Brosnan.


    Maybe so. You seem to be taking this all a little bit personally really, I haven't disagreed with you at all, don't really see where this angst is coming from. Take it easy.

    Nothing personal. I am not angry, but arguing based on established facts. Cubby is a very well documented man.

    As for speculation, I did not create the thread.
  • Posts: 4,325
    acoppola wrote: »
    tanaka123 wrote: »
    acoppola wrote: »
    tanaka123 wrote: »
    acoppola wrote: »
    tanaka123 wrote: »
    acoppola wrote: »
    tanaka123 wrote: »
    acoppola wrote: »
    Birdleson wrote: »
    I say SF because Cubby liked moneymakers and broad public appeal.

    Agreed. If we're talking about Cubby just retiring and sitting back and watching all the same things occur then SF would be his favourite especially with Adele winning an Oscar and the 50th but I also think he'd get a real kick out of CR's critical reception. He probably hadn't seen love like that from critics since the 60s. And the revitalisation of the Bond franchise.

    Disagree. Cubby approved of Brosnan for the casting in Goldeneye. Simple facts dictate that with Cubby around, there would be no Craig. And Goldeneye was very well critically received.

    I cannot imagine Cubby being thrilled with Craig's hairstyle choice in SF. Looked more suited to a villain in Tarantino's Inglorious Basterds!



    He wasn't thrilled with Roger Moore to begin with.

    But, Moore had the English gentleman look which Broccoli liked. And Moore was huge as The Saint.

    Exactly - he was won round to Moore.

    For LALD, Guy Hamilton wanted Burt Reynolds. Cubby said no. He wanted Bond to be six feet tall. Craig would not have been considered.

    Moore was not a hard sell for Broccoli and a safe choice. You need to read Broccoli's autobiography.

    I've read his autobiograhy, and I in no way disagree with you that Moore wasn't a hard sell for Broccoli only that he was intially sceptical. Specualting about whether Cubby would or would not have gone with Craig is pointless.

    If Broccoli vetoed Sam Neill's casting in 1986, despite everyone else in favour, there is no way he would be more generous to Craig.

    There is no speculation knowing Broccoli's preferences. I find the revisionism of Broccoli's tastes laughable. You may as well tell me Quentin Tarantino prefers Craig over Brosnan.


    Maybe so. You seem to be taking this all a little bit personally really, I haven't disagreed with you at all, don't really see where this angst is coming from. Take it easy.

    Nothing personal. I am not angry, but arguing based on established facts. Cubby is a very well documented man.

    Absolutely Tarantino.
  • acoppolaacoppola London Ealing not far from where Bob Simmons lived
    Posts: 1,243
    tanaka123 wrote: »
    acoppola wrote: »
    tanaka123 wrote: »
    acoppola wrote: »
    tanaka123 wrote: »
    acoppola wrote: »
    tanaka123 wrote: »
    acoppola wrote: »
    tanaka123 wrote: »
    acoppola wrote: »
    Birdleson wrote: »
    I say SF because Cubby liked moneymakers and broad public appeal.

    Agreed. If we're talking about Cubby just retiring and sitting back and watching all the same things occur then SF would be his favourite especially with Adele winning an Oscar and the 50th but I also think he'd get a real kick out of CR's critical reception. He probably hadn't seen love like that from critics since the 60s. And the revitalisation of the Bond franchise.

    Disagree. Cubby approved of Brosnan for the casting in Goldeneye. Simple facts dictate that with Cubby around, there would be no Craig. And Goldeneye was very well critically received.

    I cannot imagine Cubby being thrilled with Craig's hairstyle choice in SF. Looked more suited to a villain in Tarantino's Inglorious Basterds!



    He wasn't thrilled with Roger Moore to begin with.

    But, Moore had the English gentleman look which Broccoli liked. And Moore was huge as The Saint.

    Exactly - he was won round to Moore.

    For LALD, Guy Hamilton wanted Burt Reynolds. Cubby said no. He wanted Bond to be six feet tall. Craig would not have been considered.

    Moore was not a hard sell for Broccoli and a safe choice. You need to read Broccoli's autobiography.

    I've read his autobiograhy, and I in no way disagree with you that Moore wasn't a hard sell for Broccoli only that he was intially sceptical. Specualting about whether Cubby would or would not have gone with Craig is pointless.

    If Broccoli vetoed Sam Neill's casting in 1986, despite everyone else in favour, there is no way he would be more generous to Craig.

    There is no speculation knowing Broccoli's preferences. I find the revisionism of Broccoli's tastes laughable. You may as well tell me Quentin Tarantino prefers Craig over Brosnan.


    Maybe so. You seem to be taking this all a little bit personally really, I haven't disagreed with you at all, don't really see where this angst is coming from. Take it easy.

    Nothing personal. I am not angry, but arguing based on established facts. Cubby is a very well documented man.

    Absolutely Tarantino.

    :))
  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 5,131
    I think Cubby would prefer CR as it is the closest to the class and tone of FRWL. But saying that, Craig would never have won the part whilst Cubby was alive.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 41,007
    That can be debated.
    SP has a clear plot with a clear goal that the villain is aiming at.
    There are no major plot holes. And the few there are don't matter as it is a film not taking itself very seriously, like it is the normal case for a Bond film.
    SF on the other hand made the grave mistake to dispose of all the fun and take itself way too seriously, the many plot holes, about all concerning Silva, is just unbelievably lazy writing, if not downright stupid.

    One thing is for sure, SP would have been like it is, but Blofeld would have been Blofeld without the awkward foster-brother thing.

    SP is exactly the kind of film, Cubby would love to bits. Pure Bond, pure fun, pure entertainment with daring original stunt work to just name a few examples.

    I disagree with a good bit of this, but to avoid yet another repeat of why I don't care for either film, I'll just leave it at that. I'm still under the impression he would've enjoyed SF leagues more than what SP had to offer.
Sign In or Register to comment.